Fragrance material review on nerolidol (isomer unspecified)

Food and Chemical Toxicology

Volumn 46, Issue 11 SUPPL., 2008, Pages

  Lapczynski, A ^a   Bhatia, S P ^a   Letizia, C S ^a   Api, A M ^a  

^a RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR FRAGRANCE MATERIALS   (United States)

Author keywords

Fragrance; Nerolidol; Review

Indexed keywords

FRAGRANCE; NEROLIDOL;

ACUTE TOXICITY; ARTICLE; CONTACT DERMATITIS; EYE IRRITATION; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; SKIN IRRITATION; SKIN TOXICITY; TISSUE LEVEL; TOXICITY TESTING;

ANIMALS; GUINEA PIGS; HUMANS; ISOMERISM; MICE; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PERFUME; RABBITS; RATS; SESQUITERPENES;

EID: 55649114409     PISSN: 02786915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.06.063     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Belsito D., Bickers D., Bruze M., Calow P., Greim H., Hanifin J.H., Rogers A.E., Saurat J.H., Sipes I.G., and Tagami H. A toxicologic and dermatologic assessment of cyclic and non cyclic terpene alcohols when used as fragrance ingredients. Food and Chemical Toxicology 46 11S (2008) S1-S71
2. FEMA (Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association), 1965. Recent progress in the consideration of flavoring ingredients under the food additives amendment 3. GRAS Substances. Food Technology 19(2 part 2), 151-197.
3. Food and Drug Administration. Code of Federal Regulations, 21 CFR (172.515). Title 21 - Food and Drugs, vol. 3, Chapter I - Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services. Part 172 - Food Additives Permitted for Direct Addition to Food for Human Consumption. Subpart F - Flavoring Agents and Related Substances, 515 - Synthetic Flavoring Substances and Adjuvants.
4. Hausen B.M., Evers P., Stuwe H.T., Konig W.A., and Wollenerber E. Propolis allergy (IV). Studies with further sensitizers from propolis and constituents common to propolis, poplar buds and balsam of Peru. Contact Dermatitis 26 (1992) 34-44
5. Hausen B.M. Contact allergy to balsam of Peru. II. Patch test results in 102 patients with selected balsam of Peru. American Journal of Contact Dermatitis 12 (2001) 93-102
6. IFRA (International Fragrance Association), 2007. Use Level Survey, February 2007.
7. Klecak, G., 1979. The open epicutaneous test (OET), a predictive test procedure in the guinea pig for estimation of allergenic properties of simple chemical compounds, their mixtures and of finished cosmetic preparations. International Federation Societies Cosmetic Chemists, 9/18/79.
8. Klecak G. The Freund′s Complete Adjuvant Test and the Open Epicutaneous Test. Current Problems in Dermatology 14 (1985) 152-171
9. Kligman A.M. The identification of contact allergens by human assay. III. The maximization test. A procedure for screening and rating contact sensitizers. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 47 (1966) 393-409
10. Kligman A.M., and Epstein W.L. Updating the maximization test for identifying contact allergens. Contact Dermatitis 1 (1975) 231-239
11. RIFM (Research Institute for Fragrance Materials Inc.), 1967a. Acute toxicity, eye and skin irritation test of fragrance materials. RIFM report number 30645, August 20, RIFM, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA.
12. RIFM (Research Institute for Fragrance Materials Inc.), 1967b. Acute toxicity, eye and skin irritation test of fragrance materials. RIFM report number 30642, September 20, RIFM, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA.
13. RIFM (Research Institute for Fragrance Materials Inc.), 1973a. Acute oral and dermal toxicity studies. RIFM report number 2003, March 5, RIFM, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA.
14. RIFM (Research Institute for Fragrance Materials Inc.), 1973b. Report on human maximization studies. RIFM report number 1802, July 27, RIFM, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA.
15. Sharp D.W. The sensitization potential of some perfume ingredients tested using a modified Draize procedure. Toxicology 9 (1978) 261-271