Finding quasi-optimal network topologies for information transmission in active networks

PLoS ONE

Volumn 3, Issue 10, 2008, Pages

  Baptista, Murilo S ^a,b   de Carvalho, Josué X ^a   Hussein, Mahir S ^a,c  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR PHYSIK KOMPLEXER SYSTEME   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BIOINFORMATICS; BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER NETWORK; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC ACTIVITY; ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NERVE CELL NETWORK; THEORETICAL STUDY; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; HUMAN; NERVE CELL; NERVE TRACT; PHYSIOLOGY; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NEURAL PATHWAYS; NEURONS; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION;

EID: 55649095068     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003479     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Smith VA, Yu J, Smulders TV, Hartemink AJ, Jarvis ED (2006) Computation inference of neural information flow networks. PLoS Comput Bio 2: e161.
2. Eggermont JJ (1998) Is there a Neural Code. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 22: 355-370.
3. Borst A, Theunissen FE (1999) Information theory and neural coding. Nature neuroscience 2: 947-957.
4. Strong SP, Köberle R, de Ruyter van Steveninck RR, Bialek W (1998) Entropy and Information in Neural Spike Trains. Phys Rev Lett 80: 197-201.
5. Palus M, Komárek V, Procházka T, Hrncír Z, Sterbová K (2001) Synchronization and information flow in EEGs of Epileptic Patients IEEE Engineering in medicice and biology. September/ october. pp 65-71.
6. Zochowski M, Dzakpasu (2004) R Conditional entropies, phase synchronization and changes in the directionality of information flow in neural systems. J Phys A: Math Gen 37: 3823-3834.
7. Jirsa VK (2004) Connectivity and Dynamics of Neural Information Processing. Neuroinformatics 2: 1-22.
8. Schreiber T (2000) Measuring Information Transfer Phys. Rev Lett 85: 461-464.
9. San Liang X, Kleeman R (2005) Information transfer between dynamical systems components. Phys Rev Lett 95: 244101-1-244101-4.
10. Baptista MS, Kurths J (2005) Chaotic channel. Phys Rev E 72: 045202.
11. Baptista MS, Kurths J (2008) Transmission of information in active networks. Phys Rev E 77: 026205.
12. Baptista MS, Kakmeni FM, Magno DM, Hussein MS. Bounds for Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy of active networks, subm. for publication (http://arxiv.org/abs/0805.3487).
13. Sporns O, Chialvo DR, Kaiser M, Hilgetag CC (2004) Organization, development and function of complex brain networks. Trends Cogn Sci. (2004), 8: 418-425.
14. Sporns O, Tononi G, Kotter R (2005) The Human Connectome: A Structural Description of the Human. Brain PLos Comput Biol. (2005), 1: e42-.
15. Eguiluz VM, Chialvo DR, Cecchi GA, et al. (2005) Scale-Free Brain Functional Networks. Phys Rev Lett 94: 018102.
16. Perc M (2007) Effects of small-world connectivity on noise-induced temporal and spatial order in neural media. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 31: 280-291.
17. Wagner C, Stoop R (2007) Neocortex's small world of fractal coupling. Int J Bifurcat Chaos 17: 3409-3414.
18. Hindmarsh JL, Rose RM (1984) A model of neuronal bursting using three coupled first order differential equations. Proc R Soc Lond B 221: 87-102.
19. der Malsburg CV (1985) Nervous structures with dynamical links. Ber Bunsenges Phys Chem 89: 703-710.
20. Ipsen M (2002) Mikhailov AS Evolutionary reconstruction of networks. Phys Rev E 66: 046109.
21. Heagy JF, Carrol TL, Pecora LM (1994) Synchronous chaos in coupled oscillators systems. Phys Rev E 50: 1874-1885.
22. Heagy JF, Carrol TL, and Pecora LM (1995) Short Wavelength bifurcations and size instabilities in coupled oscillator systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74: 4185-4188
23. Pecora LM and Carroll (1998) Master stability functions for synchronized coupled systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80: 2109-2112
24. Pecora LM (1998) Synchronization conditions and desynchronization patterns in coupled limit-cycle and chaotic systems. Phys. Rev. E 58: 347-360
25. Barahona M and Pecora LM (2002) Synchronization in small-world systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89: 054101.
26. Pareti G, Palma A (2004) Does the brain oscillate? The dispute on neuronal synchronization. Neurol Sci 25: 41-47.
27. Many pathological brain diseases, as Epilepsy, are associated with the appearance of synchronization.
28. Chavez M, Hwang DU, Martinerie J, Boccaletti S (2006) Degree mixing and the enhancement of synchronization in complex weighted networks. Phys Rev E 74: 066107.
29. Chavez M, Hwang DU, Amann A, et al. (2006) Synchronizing weighted complex networks CHAOS 16: 015106
30. Chavez M, Hwang DU, Amann A, et al. Synchronization is enhanced in weighted complex networks (2005) Phys. Rev. Lett. 94: 218701.
31. Zhou CS, Kurths J (2006) Dynamical weights and enhanced synchronization in adaptive complex networks. Phys Rev Lett 96: 164102.
32. Zhou CS, Motter AE, Kurths J Universality in the synchronization of weighted random networks (2006) Phys. Rev. Lett. 96: 034101.
33. Rosenblum M, Pikovsky A (2004) Delayed feedback control of collective synchrony: An approach to suppression of pathological brain rhythms. Phys Rev E 70: 041904.
34. Djurfeldt M, Lundqvist M, Johansson C, et al. Project report for Blue Gene Watson Consortium Days: Massively parallel simulation of brain-scale neuronal networks models (Stockholm University, Sweden 2006).
35. Corron NJ, Hayes ST, Pethel SD, et al. (2006) Chaos without Nonlinear Dynamics. Phys Rev Lett 97: 024101.
36. Pesin YB (1977) Characteristic Lyapunov Exponents and Smooth Ergodic Theory. Russian Math Surveys 32: 55-114.
37. Baptista MS, Garcia SP, Dana S, Kurths J. Transmission of information in active networks: an experimental point of view, to appear in Europhysics Journal.
38. Mendes RV (1998) Conditional exponents, entropies and a measure of dynamical self-organization. Phys Lett A 248: 167-171. (2000) Characterizing self-organization and coevolution by ergodic invariants. Physica A 276: 550-571.
39. Systems of bidirectional equal couplings can be considered as models of electrical gap junctions, a coupling that allows bidirectional flowing of information in neural networks.