Transmission of information in active networks

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2008, Pages

  Baptista, M S ^a   Kurths, J ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR PHYSIK KOMPLEXER SYSTEME   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; CHAOTIC SYSTEMS; COMMUNICATION CHANNELS (INFORMATION THEORY); DATA TRANSFER; DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

ACTIVE CHANNELS; CHAOTIC NEURONS;

CHANNEL CAPACITY;

EID: 38949115726     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.77.026205     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. S. P. Strong, R. Köberle, R. R. de Ruyter van Steveninck, and W. Bialek, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.197 80, 197 (1998).
2. M. Kihara, O. Sadayasy, and P. Eskelinen, Digital Clocks for Synchronization and Communication (Artech House, London, 2002).
3. C. Von der Malsburg, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. BBPCAX 0005-9021 89, 703 (1985).
4. W. J. Freeman, Clin. Neurophysiol. ZZZZZZ 1388-2457 44, 586 (1978).
5. W. Singer, Neuron NERNET 0896-6273 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80821-1 24, 49 (1999).
6. A. Treisman, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. COPUEN 0959-4388 10.1016/S0959- 4388(96)80070-5 6, 171 (1996).
7. A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths, Synchronization A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences (Cambridge, London, 2003).
8. S. Strogatz, Sync: The Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order (Hyperium, New York, 2003).
9. G. Pareti and A. Palma, Neurol. Sci. 25, 41 (2004). 1590-1874
10. M. Shadlen and J. A. Movshon, Neuron NERNET 0896-6273 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80822-3 24, 67 (1999).
11. C. E. Shannon and W. Weaver, The Mathematical Theory of Communication (The University of Illinois Press, Champaign, IL, 1949).
12. J.-P. Eckmann and D. Ruelle, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.57.617 57, 617 (1985).
13. In order to be able to proceed with analytical calculations, we only consider autonomous networks. However, note that every element of an active channel generates an information signal that can be interpreted as an external time-dependent input of the channel.
14. If the subspace α has euclidian dimension Dα, and the subspace β euclidian dimension Dβ, the subspace α,β will have an euclidian dimension Dα + Dβ. The course graining is realized by hypercubes with volume Dα, Dβ, and Dα + Dβ, for the subspaces α, β, and α,β, respectively. At this particular point of the manuscript, we consider the active channel to be formed by only one receiver and one transmitter such that the subspace α,β represents the whole channel.
15. A. Arnold, Ergodic Problems of Classical Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, New York, 1988).
16. Ya. B. Pesin, Russ. Math. Surv. 32, 55 (1977). 0036-0279
17. F. Takens, in Dynamical Systems and Turbulence, edited by, D. A. Rand, and, L. S. Young, (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1980).
18. In Eq. 3, we assume that the subspaces α and β contribute each with at most one positive (or one negative) λ. Otherwise, a summation would have to be carried out over all possible positive (negative) exponents.
19. E. Bollt, Y. C. Lai, and C. Grebogi, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.3787 79, 3787 (1997).
20. M. S. Baptista and J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.045202 72, 045202 (R) (2005).
21. Systems of bidirectional equal couplings can be considered as models of electrical gap junctions, a coupling that allows bidirectional flowing of information in neural networks.
22. L. M. Pecora and T. L. Carroll, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.821 64, 821 (1990).
23. R. Vilela Mendes, Phys. Lett. A PYLAAG 0375-9601 10.1016/S0375-9601(98) 00604-5 248, 167 (1998).
24. R. Badii, G. Broggi, B. Derighetti, M. Ravani, S. Ciliberto, A. Politi, and M. A. Rubio, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.979 60, 979 (1988).
25. E. Ott, Chaos in Dynamical Systems (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2002).
26. F. Ledrappier and L. S. Young, Ann. Math. 122, 508 (1985). 0003-486X
27. In fact, D1 (α) λ (α) = D1 (β) | λ (β) |, which means that the rate of information produced in the transmiter D1 (α) λ (α) is conserved by the channel, and thus completely arrives at the receiver.
28. M. S. Baptista and L. López, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.65.055201 65, 055201 (R) (2002).
29. R. R. Llinás, Handbook of Physiology; The Neurvous System (American Physiological Society, Bethesda, 1981)
30. S. P. Marshall and E. J. Lang, J. Neurosci. JNRSDS 0270-6474 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3907-04.2004 24, 11356 (2004).
31. M. C. Eguia, M. I. Rabinovich, and H. D. I. Abarbanel, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.62.7111 62, 7111 (2000).
32. F. T. Arecchi, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. LNCSD9 0302-9743 3146, 90 (2004).
33. M. S. Baptista, C. Grebogi, and R. Köberle, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London PTRMAD 0962-8428 366, 345 (2008).
34. J. L. Hindmarsh and R. M. Rose, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B PRLBA4 0962-8452 10.1098/rspb.1984.0024 221, 87 (1984).
35. R. Luna, Nat. Neurosci. NANEFN 1097-6256 10.1038/nn1513 8, 1210 (2005).
36. If we had defined CC as the maximal of the MIR for all possible parameter realizations in the elements of the channel, we would have concluded that the new defined capacity would be always reached for channels composed of elements that have equal parameters. Since we are often dealing with channels composed of elements that possess either equal or very similar parameters, the many channel capacities calculated throughout the paper can be considered to be the maximum over many coupling and parameter configurations.
37. For λ2 <0, one has to take into account the calculation of IC, using Eq. 3, the existence of a fractal set. Notice however that Eq. 1 can always be used to estimate the MIR, even if λ2 <0. From that, we arrive at the same conclusions concerning the channel capacity, i.e., CC (=0) CC (>0).
38. D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/30918 393, 440 (1998).
39. N. Schweighofer, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. PNASA6 0027-8424 10.1073/pnas.0305966101 101, 4655 (2004).
40. I. Belykh, E. de Lange, and M. Hasler, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.188101 94, 188101 (2005).
41. R. Badii and A. Politi, Complexity, Hierarchical Structures and Scaling in Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1997).
42. W. Ott, B. Hunt, and V. Kaloshin, Ergod. Theory Dyn. Syst. 26, 869 (2006). 0143-3857
43. M. S. Baptista, S. Boccaletti, K. Josić, and I. Leyva, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.056228 69, 056228 (2004).
44. M. S. Baptista, T. Pereira, and J. Kurths, Physica D. 216, 260 (2006). 0167-2789
45. T. Pereira, M. S. Baptista, and J. Kurths, Phys. Lett. A PYLAAG 0375-9601 10.1016/j.physleta.2006.09.099 362, 159 (2007).
46. D. Gabor, J. IEEE London 93, 429 (1946).
47. M. S. Baptista, Physica D. 212, 216 (2005). 0167-2789
48. T. Pereira, M. S. Baptista, and J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.026216 75, 026216 (2007).