Fragrance material review on carveol

Food and Chemical Toxicology

Volumn 46, Issue 11 SUPPL., 2008, Pages

  Bhatia, S P ^a   McGinty, D ^a   Letizia, C S ^a   Api, A M ^a  

^a RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR FRAGRANCE MATERIALS   (United States)

Author keywords

Carveol; Fragrance material; Review

Indexed keywords

CARVEOL; FRAGRANCE;

ACUTE TOXICITY; ARTICLE; HUMAN; KIDNEY DISEASE; NONHUMAN; SKIN SENSITIZATION; SKIN TOXICITY; TOXICITY TESTING;

ANIMALS; DRUG ADMINISTRATION ROUTES; GUINEA PIGS; HUMANS; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; MONOTERPENES; PERFUME; RATS;

EID: 55649092458     PISSN: 02786915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.06.032     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Ames B.N., McCann J., and Yamasaki E. Methods for detecting carcinogens and mutagens with the Salmonella/mammalian-microsome mutagenicity test. Mutation Research 31 (1975) 347-363
2. Belsito D., Bickers D., Bruze M., Calow P., Greim H., Hanifin J.H., Rogers A.E., Saurat J.H., Sipes I.G., and Tagami H. A toxicologic and dermatologic assessment of cyclic and non-cyclic terpene alcohols when used as fragrance ingredients. Food and Chemical Toxicology 46 11S (2008) S1-S71
3. Boutin J.A., Thomassin J., Siest G., and Cartier A. Heterogeneity of hepatic microsomal UDP-glucuronosyltransferase activities. Conjugations of phenolic and monoterpenoid aglycons in control and induced rats and guinea pigs. Biochemical Pharmacology 34 (1985) 2235-2249
4. Council of Europe, 2000. Partial Agreement in the Social and Public Health Field. Chemically Defined Flavouring Substances. Group 2.1.5 Cyclic Terpene Alcohols, Number 2027. Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg, p. 69.
5. Food and Drug Administration, Code of Federal Regulations, 21 CFR 172.515. Title 21 - Food and Drugs, vol. 3, Chapter I - Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services. Part 172 - Food Additives Permitted for Direct Addition to Food for Human Consumption. Subpart F - Flavoring Agents and Related Substances, 515 - Synthetic Flavoring Substances and Adjuvants.
6. FEMA (Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association), 1965. Recent progress in the consideration of flavoring ingredients under the food additives amendment III. GRAS substances. Food Technology 19, 151-197.
7. IFRA (International Fragrance Association), 2004. Use Level Survey, September.
8. Imaizumi K., Hanada K., Mawatari K., and Sugano M. Effect of essential oils on the concentration of serum lipids and apolipoproteins in rats. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry 49 (1985) 2795-2796
9. Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives, 1998. Safety evaluation of certain food additives. Who Food Additives Series: 42. Prepared by the 51st Meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), World Health Organization, Geneva 2000.
10. Kligman A.M. The identification of contact allergens by human assay. III. The maximization test. A procedure for screening and rating contact sensitizers. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 47 (1966) 393-409
11. Kligman A.M., and Epstein W. Updating the maximization test for identifying contact allergens. Contact Dermatitis 1 (1975) 231-239
12. Lehman-McKeeman L.D., and Caudill D. Development of an in vitro competitive binding assay to predict alpha2u-globulin nephropathy. In Vitro and Molecular Toxicology 12 (1999) 83-95
13. Mortelmans K., Haworth S., Lawlor T., Speck W., Tainer B., and Zeiger E. Salmonella mutagenicity tests: II. Results from the testing of 270 chemicals. Environmental Mutagenesis 8 (1986) 1-119
14. Mulder G.J., and Van Doorn A.B.D. Rapid NAD-linked assay for microsomal uridine diphosphate glucuronyltransferase of rat liver and observations on substrate specificity of the enzyme. The Biochemical Journal 151 (1975) 131-140
15. RIFM (Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc.), 1972. The contact-sensitization potential of fragrance materials by maximization testing in humans. RIFM Report Number 1804, RIFM, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA, February to November.