The personal and professional characteristics and work of itinerant Teachers of the deaf and hard of hearing in Australia

Volta Review

Volumn 104, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 51-67

  Hyde, Merv ^a   Power, Des ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 55649083930     PISSN: 00428639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Antia, S., Stinson, M., & Gaustad, M. (2002). Developing membership in the education of deaf and hard of hearing students in inclusive settings. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 7,224-229.
2. Bunch, G. (1994). An interpretation of full inclusion. American Annals of the Deaf, 139,150-152.
3. Eatough, M. (2000). Deaf children and teachers of the deaf: Raw data from the BATOD survey: England. January 1998. The BATOD Magazine, lift out, pages not numbered.
4. Giangreco, M. F. (2000). Related services research for students with low-incidence disabilities: Implications for speech-language pathologists. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 31,230-239.
5. Gregory, S., Bishop, ]., & Sheldon, L. (1995). Deaf young people and their families: Developing understanding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Higgs, N. (1998). The changing role of itinerant teachers: Is the move towards more inclusive education providing the best service to the individual hearing impaired child? The Australian Journal of Education of the Deaf, 4,49-53.
7. Holden-Pitt, L., & Diaz, J. A. (1998). Thirty years of the Annual Survey of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children and Youth: A glance over the decades. American Annals of the Deaf, 142,72-76.
8. Jenkins, J. R., Pious, C. G., & Jewell, M. (1990). Special education and the regular classroom initiative: Basic assumptions. Exceptional Children, 56, 479-491.
9. Karagiannis, A., Stainback, W., & Stainback, S. (1996). Rationale for inclusive schooling. In S. Stainback & W. Stainback (Eds.), Inclusion: A guide for educators (pp. 3-16). Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks.
10. Kirchner, C. (1994). Co-enrollment as an inclusion model. American Annals of the Deaf, 139,163-164.
11. Kirchner, C. (2000, July). Co-enrollment: An effective answer to the mainstream debacle. Paper presented at the International Congress on Education of the Deaf, Sydney, Australia.
12. Kluwin, T. (1999). Co-teaching deaf and hearing students: Research on social integration. American Annals of the Deaf, 144,339-344.
13. Kluwin, T., Gonsher, W., Silver, K., & Samuels, J. (1996). Team-teaching students with hearing impairments and students with normal hearing together. Teaching Exceptional Children, 29,11-15.
14. Konza, D., & Paterson, J. (1996). The itinerant teacher in isolation. The Australian Journal of Education of the Deaf, 2,42-47.
15. Luckner, J. (1991). Consultation skills for teachers of students with hearing impairments. Tfie Volta Review, 93, 311-322.
16. Luckner, J. (1999). An examination of two co-teaching classrooms. American Annals of the Deaf, 144,24-34.
17. Luckner, J. L., & Miller, K. J. (1994). Itinerant teachers: Responsibilities, perceptions, preparation, and students served. American Annals of the Deaf, 139, 111-118.
18. Luckner, J., Rude, H., & Sileo, T. (1989). Collaborative consultation: A method for improving educational services for mainstreaming students who are hearing impaired. American Annals of the Deaf, 134,301-304.
19. Paterson, J., & Truscott, I. (1995). Models of integration for hearing impaired and deaf students: Current practice and future trends. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Hobart.
20. Power, D., & Hyde, M. (2002). The characteristics and extent of participation of deaf and hard of hearing students in regular classes in Australian schools. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 7, 302-311.
21. Powers, S. (1996a). Inclusion is an attitude, not a place: Part 1. Journal of the British Association of Teachers of the Deaf, 20,35-41.
22. Powers, S. (1996b). Inclusion is an attitude, not a place: part 2. Journal of the British Association of Teachers of the Deaf, 20,65-69.
23. Powers, S. (2002). From concepts to practice in deaf education: A United Kingdom perspective on inclusion. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 7,230-243.
24. Reynolds, M. C, Wang, M. C, & Walberg, H. J. (1987). The necessary restructuring of special and regular instruction. Exceptional Children, 53,391-398.
25. Schildroth, A. N., & Hotto, S. A. (1996). Changes in student and program characteristics, 1984-85 and 1994-95. American Annals of the Deaf, 141,68-71.
26. Stinson, M. S., & Antia, S. D. (1999). Considerations in educating deaf and hard-of-hearing students in inclusive settings. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 4,163-175.
27. Stinson, M., & Kluwin, T. (2003). Educational consequences of alternative school placements. In M. Marschark & P. E. Spencer (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Deaf Studies, Language, and Education (pp. 52-64). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
28. Walther-Thomas, C., Bryant, M., & Land, S. (1996). Planning for effective co-teaching: The key to successful inclusion. Remedial and Special Education, 17, 255-265.
29. Westwood, P. (1997). Moving towards inclusion: Proceed with caution. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 2,18-20.
30. Winn, S. (1995). Hearing impairment services itinerant teaching service in South Australia. The Australian Journal of Education of the Deaf, 1,22-27.
31. Yarger, C., & Luckner, J. (1999). Itinerant teaching: The inside story. American Annals of the Deaf, 144,309-314.