A United States cost-benefit comparison of an apodized, diffractive, presbyopia-correcting, multifocal intraocular lens and a conventional monofocal lens

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Volumn 34, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 1855-1861

  Maxwell, William A ^a   Waycaster, Curtis R ^a   D'Souza, Anna O ^a   Meissner, Brian L ^a   Hileman, Kendra ^a  

^a California Alcon Laboratories (Waycaster Hileman) Fort Worth   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CATARACT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC ASPECT; FEMALE; HUMAN; LENS IMPLANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIFOCAL LENS; PRESBYOPIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPECTACLES;

AGED; COST OF ILLNESS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FINANCING, PERSONAL; HUMANS; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; MALE; PRESBYOPIA; QUALITY OF LIFE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 55649083510     PISSN: 08863350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.07.024     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bellucci R. Multifocal intraocular lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 16 (2005) 33-37
2. Dick H.B., Krummenauer F., Schwenn O., Krist R., and Pfeiffer N. Objective and subjective evaluation of photic phenomena after monofocal and multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology 106 (1999) 1878-1886
3. Gimbel H.V., Sanders D.R., and Raanan M.G. Visual and refractive results of multifocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 98 (1991) 881-887 discussion by JT Holladay, 888
4. Davison J.A., and Simpson M.J. History and development of the apodized diffractive intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 32 (2006) 849-858
5. Chiam P.J.T., Chan J.H., Aggarwal R.K., and Kasaby S. ReSTOR intraocular lens implantation in cataract surgery: quality of vision. J Cataract Refract Surg 32 (2006) 1459-1463 errata, 1987
6. Lehmann R., Waycaster C., and Hileman K. A comparison of patient-reported outcomes from an apodized diffractive intraocular lens and a conventional monofocal intraocular lens. Curr Med Res Opin 22 (2006) 2591-2602
7. Mamalis N. Additional payments for presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses. [editorial]. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 1467-1468
8. Drummond M.F., O'Brien B.J., Stoddart G.F., and Torrance G. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 2nd ed. (1997), Oxford University Press, New York, NY
9. Bala M.V., Mauskopf J.A., and Wood L.L. Willingness to pay as a measure of health benefits. Pharmacoeconomics 15 (1999) 9-18
10. Davey P., Grainger D., MacMillan J., Rajan N., Aristides M., and Dobson M. Economic evaluation of insulin lispro versus neutral (regular) insulin therapy using a willingness-to-pay approach. Pharmacoeconomic 13 (1998) 347-358
11. Oscarson N., Lindholm L., and Källestål C. The value of caries preventive care among 19-year olds using the contingent valuation method within a cost-benefit approach. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 35 (2007) 109-117
12. Anderson G., Black C., Dunn E., Alonso J., Christian-Norregard J., Folmer-Anderson T., and Bernth-Peterson P. Willingness to pay to shorten waiting time for cataract surgery; what are the preferences of people actually on the waiting list for surgery?. Health Aff 16 5 (1997) 181-190. http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/reprint/16/5/181.pdf Available at:
13. Shrestha M.K., Thakur J., Gurung C.K., Joshi A.B., Pokhrel S., and Ruit S. Willingness to pay for cataract surgery in Kathmandu valley. Br J Ophthalmol 88 (2004) 319-320
14. Javitt J.C., Wang F., Trentacost D.J., Rowe M., and Tarantino N. Outcomes of cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation; functional status and quality of life. Ophthalmology 104 (1997) 589-599
15. Arias E. National Vital Statistics Report: United States Life Tables, 2000 (2002), National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr51/nvsr51_03.pdf Accessed July 24, 2008
16. Javitt J.C., Jacobson G., and Schiffman R.M. Validity and reliability of the Cataract TyPE Spec: an instrument for measuring outcomes of cataract extraction. Am J Ophthalmol 136 (2003) 285-290
17. Redelmeier D.A., and Heller D.N. Time preference in medical decision making and cost-effectiveness analysis. Med Decis Making 13 (1993) 212-217
18. Briggs A.H., Goeree R., Blackhouse G., and O'Brien B.J. Probabilistic analysis of cost-effectiveness models: choosing between treatment strategies for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Med Decis Making 22 (2002) 290-308
19. Brown M.M., and Brown G.C. How to interpret a healthcare economic analysis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 16 (2005) 191-194
20. Yasunaga H., Ide H., Imamura T., and Ohe K. Willingness to pay for health care services in common cold, retinal detachment, and myocardiac infarction: an internet survey in Japan. BMC Health Serv Res 6 (2006) 12. http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1472-6963-6-12.pdf Accessed July 26, 2008
21. Slagsvold J.E. 3M diffractive multifocal intraocular lens: eight year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 26 (2000) 402-407
22. Lundström M., and Wendel E. Duration of self assessed benefit of cataract extraction: a long term study. Br J Ophthalmol 89 (2005) 1017-1020
23. Rahman I., and Jones N.P. Long-term results of cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation in patients with uveitis. Eye 19 (2005) 191-197
24. Bayoumi A.M. The measurement of contingent valuation for health economics. Pharmacoeconomics 22 (2004) 691-700