A comparison of patient-reported outcomes from an apodized diffractive intraocular lens and a conventional monofocal intraocular lens

Current Medical Research and Opinion

Volumn 22, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 2591-2602

  Lehmann, Robert ^a   Waycaster, Curtis ^b   Hileman, Kendra ^b  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b ALCON RESEARCH LTD   (United States)

Author keywords

Eyeglasses utilization; Health status indicators; Intraocular; Lens implantation; Patient satisfaction; Treatment outcome; Visual acuity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CATARACT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIFFRACTION; FEMALE; GLARE; HUMAN; LENS IMPLANT; LIGHT; MALE; OPEN STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF CONCEPT; SELF REPORT; SPECTACLES; VISUAL ACUITY;

AGED; CATARACT; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EYEGLASSES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 33845972610     PISSN: 03007995     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1185/030079906X158039     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. 2006 epidemiology of cataracts and cataract surgery. The Mattson Jack Group, Feb 10 2006, pp.22-38
2. Learning DV. Practice styles and preferences of ASCRS members - 2000 survey. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:948-55
3. Javitt JC, Wang F, Trentacost DJ, et al. Outcomes of cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation: functional status and quality of life. Ophthalmology 1997;104:589-99
4. Javitt JC, Steinert RF. Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation: a multinational clinical trial evaluating clinical, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes. Ophthalmology 2000;107:2040-8
5. Leyland MD, Langan L, Goolfee F, et al. Prospective randomized double-masked trial of bilateral multifocal, bifocal or monofocal intraocular lenses. Eye 2002;16:481-90
6. Leyland M, Zinicola E. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review. Ophthalmology 2003;110:1789-98
7. Steinert RF, Aker BL, Trentacost DJ, et al. A prospective comparative study of the AMO ARRAY zonal-progressive multifocal silicone intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology 1999;106:1243-55
8. Gills JP. Subjective photic phenomena with refractive multifocal and monofocal IOLs. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:1148
9. Hunkeler JD, Coffman TM, Paugh J, et al. Characterization of visual phenomena with the Array multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:1195-04
10. Haring G, Dick HB, Krummenauer F, et al. Subjective photic phenomena with refractive multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses: results of a multicenter questionnaire. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:245-9
11. Pieh S, Lackner B, Hanselmayer G, et al. Halo size under distance and near conditions in refractive multifocal intraocular lenses. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:816-21
12. Dick HB, Krummenauer F, Schwenn O, et al. Objective and subjective evaluation of photic phenomena after monofocal and multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology 1999;106:1878-86
13. Akutsu H, Legge GE, Luebker A, et al. Multifocal intraocular lenses and glare. Optom Vis Sci 1993;70:487-95
14. McGinn P. Landmark Dutch partnership allows public health insurance patients to pay extra for multifocal IOLs. European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons [PDF]. Available from http://www.escrs.org/Publications/ Eurotimes/06April/pdf/LandmarkDutchpartnership.pdf [Last accessed 28 April 2006]
15. CMS ruling 05-01. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services [PDF]. Available from http://www.cms.hhs.gov/Rulings/downloads/CMSR0501.pdf [Last accessed 3 May 2005]
16. Javitt JC, Jacobson G, Schiffman RM. Validity and reliability of the Cataract TyPE Spec: an instrument for measuring outcomes of cataract extraction. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;136:285-90
17. ISO 11979-7, ophthalmic implants - intraocular lenses - part 7: clinical investigation: International Organization for Standardization; 15 Apr 2001. ISO 11979-7:2001
18. Kohnen T, Allen D, Boureau C, et al. European multicenter study of the AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive intraocular lens. Ophthalmology 2006;113:578-84