UBE2I (UBC9), a SUMO-conjugating enzyme, localizes to nuclear speckles and stimulates transcription in mouse oocytes

Biology of Reproduction

Volumn 79, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 906-913

  Ihara, Motomasa ^a   Stein, Paula ^a   Schultz, Richard M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Nuclear speckle; Oocyte development; Oogenesis; SUMO; Transcription; UBE2I

Indexed keywords

MESSENGER RNA; PROTEIN UBC9; SUMO 1 PROTEIN; SUMO 2 PROTEIN; SUMO 3 PROTEIN; SUMO PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; URIDINE TRIPHOSPHATE;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL NUCLEUS MEMBRANE; CELL SIZE; EMBRYO; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; IMMUNOBLOTTING; IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE; OOCYTE DEVELOPMENT; OOCYTE MATURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; RNA PROCESSING; STAINING; SUMOYLATION; WILD TYPE;

ANIMALS; CELL NUCLEUS; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; MICE; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; OOCYTES; RIBONUCLEOPROTEINS; SMALL UBIQUITIN-RELATED MODIFIER PROTEINS; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC; UBIQUITIN-CONJUGATING ENZYMES;

MAMMALIA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 55549128215     PISSN: 00063363     EISSN: 15297268     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.108.070474     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Johnson E. Protein modification by SUMO. Annu Rev Biochem 2004; 73:355-382.
2. Zhao J. Sumoylation regulates diverse biological processes. Cell Mol Life Sci 2007; 64:3017-3033.
3. Geiss-Friedlander R, Melchior F. Concepts in sumoylation: a decade on. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8:947-956.
4. Hayashi T, Seki M, Maeda D, Wang W, Kawabe Y, Seki T, Saitoh H, Fukagawa T, Yagi H, Enomoto T. Ubc9 is essential for viability of higher eukaryotic cells. Exp Cell Res 2002; 280:212-221.
5. Nowak M, Hammerschmidt M. Ubc9 regulates mitosis and cell survival during zebrafish development. Mol Biol Cell 2006; 17:5324-5336.
6. Nacerddine K, Lehembre F, Bhaumik M, Artus J, Cohen-Tannoudji M, Babinet C, Pandolfi P, Dejean A. The SUMO pathway is essential for nuclear integrity and chromosome segregation in mice. Dev Cell 2005; 9:769-779.
7. Schultz RM. Oogenesis and the control of meiotic maturation. In: Pedersen R, Rossant J (eds.), Experimental Approaches to Mammalian Embryonic Development. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1986:195-237.
8. Sorensen R, Wassarman P. Relationship between growth and meiotic maturation of the mouse oocyte. Dev Biol 1976; 50:531-536.
9. Wickramasinghe D, Albertini D. Centrosome phosphorylation and the developmental expression of meiotic competence in mouse oocytes. Dev Biol 1992; 152:62-74.
10. Wickramasinghe D, Ebert K, Albertini D. Meiotic competence acquisition is associated with the appearance of M-phase characteristics in growing mouse oocytes. Dev Biol 1991; 144:162-172.
11. Eppig J, Schroeder A. Capacity of mouse oocytes from preantral follicles to undergo embryogenesis and development to live young after growth, maturation, and fertilization in vitro. Biol Reprod 1989; 41:268-276.
12. Moore G. The RNA polymerase activity of the preimplantation mouse embryo. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1975; 275:447-458.
13. Moore G, Lintern-Moore S. Transcription of the mouse oocyte genome. Biol Reprod 1978; 18:865-870.
14. De La Fuente R, Viveiros M, Burns K, Adashi E, Matzuk M, Eppig J. Major chromatin remodeling in the germinal vesicle (GV) of mammalian oocytes is dispensable for global transcriptional silencing but required for centromeric heterochromatin function. Dev Biol 2004; 275:447-458.
15. Girdwood D, Tatham M, Hay R. SUMO and transcriptional regulation. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2004; 15:201-210.
16. Hay R. SUMO: a history of modification. Mol Cell 2005; 18:1-12.
17. Hall L, Smith K, Byron M, Lawrence J. Molecular anatomy of a speckle. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 2006; 288:664-675.
18. Svoboda P, Stein P, Hayashi H, Schultz R. Selective reduction of dormant maternal mRNAs in mouse oocytes by RNA interference. Development 2000; 127:4147-4156.
19. Svoboda P, Stein P, Schultz R. RNAi in mouse oocytes and preimplantation embryos: effectiveness of hairpin dsRNA. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2001; 287:1099-1104.
20. Chatot CL, Ziomek CA, Bavister BD, Lewis JL, Torres I. An improved culture medium supports development of random-bred 1-cell mouse embryos in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1989; 86:679-688.
21. Erbach GT, Lawitts JA, Papaioannou VE, Biggers JD. Differential growth of the mouse preimplantation embryo in chemically defined media. Biol Reprod 1994; 50:1027-1033.
22. Whitten WK. Nutrient requirements for the culture of preimplantation mouse embryo in vitro. Adv Biosci 1971; 6:129-139.
23. Kurasawa S, Schultz R, Kopf G. Egg-induced modifications of the zona pellucida of mouse eggs: effects of microinjected inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate. Dev Biol 1989; 133:295-304.
24. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970; 227:680-685.
25. Anger M, Stein P, Schultz R. CDC6 requirement for spindle formation during maturation of mouse oocytes. Biol Reprod 2005; 72:188-194.
26. Aoki F, Worrad D, Schultz R. Regulation of transcriptional activity during the first and second cell cycles in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Dev Biol 1997; 182:296-307.
27. Stein P, Svoboda P, Schultz R. Transgenic RNAi in mouse oocytes: a simple and fast approach to study gene function. Dev Biol 2003; 127:4147-4156.
28. Kang JS, Saunier EF, Akhurst RJ, Derynck R. The type I TGF-beta receptor is covalently modified and regulated by sumoylation. Nat Cell Biol 2008; 10:654-664.
29. De La Fuente R. Chromatin modifications in the germinal vesicle (GV) of mammalian oocytes. Dev Biol 2006; 292:1-12.
30. Wilson VG, Rangasamy D. Intracellular targeting of proteins by sumoylation. Exp Cell Res 2001; 271:57-65.
31. Saitoh N, Uchimura Y, Tachibana T, Sugahara S, Saitoh H, Nakao M. In situ SUMOylation analysis reveals a modulatory role of RanBP2 in the nuclear rim and PML bodies. Exp Cell Res 2006; 312:1418-1430.
32. Schwarz SE, Matuschewski K, Liakopoulos D, Scheffner M, Jentsch S. The ubiquitin-like proteins SMT3 and SUMO-1 are conjugated by the UBC9 E2 enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998; 95:560-564.
33. van Waardenburg R, Duda D, Lancaster C, Schulman B, Bjornsti M. Distinct functional domains of Ubc9 dictate cell survival and resistance to genotoxic stress. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 26:4958-4969.
34. Handwerger K, Gall J. Subnuclear organelles: new insights into form and function. Trends Cell Biol 2006; 16:19-26.
35. Parfenov VN, Pochukalina GN, Davis DS, Reinbold R, Scholer HR, Murti KG. Nuclear distribution of Oct-4 transcription factor in transcriptionally active and inactive mouse oocytes and its relation to RNA polymerase II and splicing factors. J Cell Biochem 2003; 89:720-732.
36. Borsuk E, Vautier D, Szöllösi M, Besombes D, Debey P. Development-dependent localization of nuclear antigens in growing mouse oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 1996; 43:376-386.
37. Ayaydin F, Dasso M. Distinct in vivo dynamics of vertebrate SUMO paralogues. Mol Biol Cell 2004; 15:5208-5218.
38. Saitoh H, Hinchey J. Functional heterogeneity of small ubiquitin-related protein modifiers SUMO-1 versus SUMO-2/3. J Biol Chem 2000; 275:6252-6258.
39. Seufert W, Futcher B, Jentsch S. Role of a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme in degradation of S- and M-phase cyclins. Nature 1995; 373:78-81.
40. Lee G, Melchior F, Matunis M, Mahajan R, Tian Q, Anderson P. Modification of Ran GTPase-activating protein by the small ubiquitin-related modifier SUMO-1 requires Ubc9, an E2-type ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme homologue. J Biol Chem 1998; 273:6503-6507.
41. Saitoh H, Pizzi M, Wang J. Perturbation of SUMOlation enzyme Ubc9 by distinct domain within nucleoporin RanBP2/Nup358. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:4755-4763.
42. Zhang H, Saitoh H, Matunis M. Enzymes of the SUMO modification pathway localize to filaments of the nuclear pore complex. Mol Cell Biol 2002; 22:6498-6508.
43. Palvimo JJ. PIAS proteins as regulators of small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) modifications and transcription. Biochem Soc Trans 2007; 35:1405-1408.
44. Bernardi R, Pandolfi P. Structure, dynamics and functions of promyelocytic leukaemia nuclear bodies. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8:1006-1016.
45. Saitoh N, Spahr C, Patterson S, Bubulya P, Neuwald A, Spector D. Proteomic analysis of interchromatin granule clusters. Mol Biol Cell 2004; 15:3876-3890.
46. Bentley D. Rules of engagement: co-transcriptional recruitment of pre-mRNA processing factors. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2005; 17:251-256.
47. Komili S, Silver P. Coupling and coordination in gene expression processes: a systems biology view. Nat Rev Genet 2008; 9:38-48.
48. Li T, Evdokimov E, Shen R, Chao C, Tekle E, Wang T, Stadtman E, Yang D, Chock P. Sumoylation of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins, zinc finger proteins, and nuclear pore complex proteins: a proteomic analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101:8551-8556.
49. Vassileva M, Matunis M. SUMO modification of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:3623-3632.
50. Vertegaal A, Ogg S, Jaffray E, Rodriguez M, Hay R, Andersen J, Mann M, Lamond A. A proteomic study of SUMO-2 target proteins. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:33791-33798.
51. Vethantham V, Rao N, Manley J. Sumoylation modulates the assembly and activity of the pre-mRNA 3′ processing complex. Mol Cell Biol 2007; 27:8848-8858.
52. Vethantham V, Rao N, Manley J. Sumoylation regulates multiple aspects of mammalian poly(A) polymerase function. Genes Dev 2008; 22:499-511.
53. Rappsilber J, Ryder U, Lamond A, Mann M. Large-scale proteomic analysis of the human spliceosome. Genome Res 2002; 12:1231-1245.