Underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia at sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 191, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1347-1351

  Jang, Mijung ^a   Cho, Nariya ^a   Woo, Kyung Moon ^a   Jeong, Seon Park ^b   Min, Hyun Seong ^a   In, Ae Park ^a  

^a Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Hanyang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Biopsy; Breast; Breast neoplasms; Diagnosis; Sonography; Technology

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATYPICAL DUCTAL HYPERPLASIA; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST LESION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RISK; CARCINOMA IN SITU; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; EXCISION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; KOREA; MIDDLE AGED; PREVALENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 55549111860     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.3643     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA, et al. US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. Radiology 1993; 187:507-511
2. Liberman L, Feng TL, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF. Ultrasound-guided core breast biopsy: utility and cost-effectiveness. Radiology 1998; 208:717-723
3. Smith DN, Darling ML, Meyer JE, et al. The utility of ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy: results from 500 consecutive breast biopsies. J Ultrasound Med 2001; 20:43-49
4. Tavassoli FA, Norris HJ. A comparison of the results of long-term follow-up for atypical intraductal hyperplasia and intraductal hyperplasia of the breast. Cancer 1990; 65:518-529
5. Schnitt SJ, Connolly JL, Tavassoli FA, et al. Interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of ductal proliferative breast lesions using standardized criteria. Am J Surg Pathol 1992; 16:1133-1143
6. Moore MM, Hargett CW III, Hanks JB, et al. Association of breast cancer with the finding of atypical ductal hyperplasia at core breast biopsy. Ann Surg 1997; 225:726-731
7. Sewell CW. Pathology of high-risk breast lesions and ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiol Clin North Am 2004; 42:821-830
8. Berg WA. Image-guided breast biopsy and management of high-risk lesions. Radiol Clin North Am 2004; 42:935-946
9. Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic breast biopsy: improved reliability with 14-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology 1997; 204:485-488
10. Meyer JE, Smith DN, Lester SC, et al. Large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. JAMA 1999; 281:1638-1641
11. Darling ML, Smith DN, Lester SC, et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excision. AJR 2000; 175:1341-1346
12. Philpotts LE, Shaheen NA, Carter D, Lange RC, Lee CH. Comparison of rebiopsy rates after stereotactic core needle biopsy of the breast with 11-gauge vacuum suction probe versus 14-gauge needle and automatic gun. AJR 1999; 172:683-687
13. Kettritz U, Rotter K, Schreer I, et al. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 2874 patients: a multicenter study. Cancer 2004; 100:245-251
14. Winchester DJ, Bernstein JR, Jeske JM, et al. Upstaging of atypical ductal hyperplasia after vacuum-assisted 11-gauge stereotactic core needle biopsy. Arch Surg 2003; 138:619-622
15. Pfarl G, Helbich TH, Riedl CC, et al. Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: a validation study. AJR 2002; 179:1503-1507
16. Jackman RJ, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: can some lesions be defined as probably benign after stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum assisted biopsy, eliminating the recommendation for surgical excision? Radiology 2002; 224:548-554
17. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Glassman JR, et al. Analysis of cancers not diagnosed at stereotactic core breast biopsy. Radiology 1997; 203:151-157
18. Philpotts LE, Hooley RJ, Lee CH. Comparison of automated versus vacuum-assisted biopsy methods for sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast. AJR 2003; 180:347-351
19. Grady I, Gorsuch H, Wilburn-Bailey S. Ultrasound-guided, vacuum-assisted, percutaneous excision of breast lesions: an accurate technique in the diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 201:14-17
20. Cho N, Moon WK, Cha JH, et al. Sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast: comparison of 14-gauge automated gun and 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy methods. Korean J Radiol 2005; 6:102-109
21. Youk JH, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Oh KK. Sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: a review of 2,420 cases with long-term follow-up. AJR 2008; 190:202-207
22. Liberman L. Percutaneous image-guided core breast biopsy. Radiol Clin North Am 2002; 40:483-500
23. Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates. Radiology 2001; 218:497-502
24. Liberman L, Kaplan JB, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Menell JH, Dershaw DD. To excise or to sample the mammographic target: what is the goal of stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy? AJR 2002; 179:679-683