A rubric for improving the quality of online courses

International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2008, Pages

  Blood Siegfried, Jane E ^a   Short, Nancy M ^a   Rapp, Carla Gene ^a   Hill, Elizabeth ^b   Talbert, Steve ^c   Skinner, John ^a   Campbell, Amy ^a   Goodwin, Linda ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VA Sierra Nevada Health System

^c UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Nursing; Online; Rubric

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; METHODOLOGY; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING STUDENT; ONLINE SYSTEM; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUBLIC RELATIONS; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; SELF CONCEPT; STANDARD; TEACHING; UNITED STATES;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BENCHMARKING; COMMUNICATION; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, DISTANCE; EDUCATION, NURSING, GRADUATE; FACULTY, NURSING; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NORTH CAROLINA; NURSING EDUCATION RESEARCH; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC; SELF EFFICACY; STUDENTS, NURSING;

EID: 55549107146     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1548923X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2202/1548-923X.1648     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Ashcraft, M., McMahon, J., Lesh, S., & Tabrizi, M. (2003). Peer review for online learning. Retrieved June, 2004, from http://pages.towson.edu/ mcmahon/peerreview/On-linerubric.pdf
2. Barrett, K. R., Bower, B. L., & Donovan, N. C. (2007). Teaching styles of community college instructors. American Journal of Distance Education, 21(1), 37-49.
3. Choules, A. P. (2007). The use of elearning in medical education: A review of the current situation. Journal of Post Graduate Medicine, 83, 212-216.
4. Committee for Online Instruction. (2003). What does a high quality online course look like? Retrieved June, 2004, from http://www.csuchico.edu/tlp/ resources/rubric/rubric.pdf
5. De Simone, C. (2006). Preparing our teachers for distance education. College Teaching, 54(1), 183-184.
6. Halstead, J. A., & Coudret, N. A. (2000). Implementing web-based instruction in a school of nursing: Implications for faculty and students. Journal of Professional Nursing, 16(5), 273-281.
7. nd Ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
8. Lockee, B., Moore, M., & Burton, J. (2002). Measuring success: evaluation strategies for distance education. Educause Quarterly, 1. Retrieved June, 2004, from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eqm0213.pdf
9. Murphy M., Levant, R., Hall, J., & Glueckauf, R. (2007). Distance education in professional training in psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38(1), 97-103.
10. Partnership for training. (2003). Quality standards for learner-centered online instruction. Retrieved June, 2004, from http://pftweb.org/reach/ reach_home_frameset.htm
11. Roblyer, M. D., & Ekhaml, L. (2000). How interactive are your distance courses? A rubric for assessing interaction in distance learning. Retrieved June, 2004, from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/roblyer32.html
12. Roblyer, M. D., & Wiencke, W. R. (2003). Design and use of a rubric to assess and encourage interactive qualities in distance courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 17(2), 77-98.
13. Swan, K., Bishop, T., Wisher, R., & Trollip, S. (2003, August 14). Benchmarks and milestones for measuring quality. Paper presented at the Wisconsin Distance Teaching and Learning Conference. Retrieved June, 2004, from http://www.uwex.edu/disted/conference/Resource_library/handouts/Forum 1.pdf
14. Wright, C. R. (2004). Criteria for evaluating the quality of online courses. Retrieved June, 2004, from http://elearning.typepad.com/thelearnedman/ ID/evaluatingcourses.pdf