Preparing Our Teachers for Distance Education

College Teaching

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 183-184

  Simone, Christina De ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

distance education; methodology; teacher training

Indexed keywords

EID: 84963605406     PISSN: 87567555     EISSN: 19308299     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/CTCH.54.1.183-184     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. De Simone, C., Y. Lou, and R. F. Schmid. 2001. Meaningful and interactive distance learning supported by the use of metaphor and synthesizing activities. Journal of Distance Education, no. 16:85-101.
2. Dooley, L. M. 1995. The virtual faculty office: Changing perceptions of traditional workload practices. Paper presented at the meeting of the Distance Education Conference, San Antonio, TX.
3. Gehlauf, D. N., M. A. Shatz, and T. W. Fyre. 1991. Faculty perceptions of interactive television instructional strategies: Implications for training. American Journal of Distance Education 5 (3): 21-28.
4. Hiltz, S. R. 1986. The "virtual classroom": Using Computer-mediated communication for university teaching. Journal of Communication 36 (2): 95-104.
5. Maslow, A. H. 1987. Motivation and personality. 3rd ed. New York: Harper and Row.
6. Moore, M. G., and G. Kearsley. 1996. Distance education: A systems view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
7. Northrup, P. T. 1998. Faculty perceptions of distance education: Factors influencing utilization. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 3 (4): 343-58.
8. Schuttloffel, M. J. 1998. Reflections on the dilemma of distance learning. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 4 (1): 45-58.
9. Shedletsky, L. 1997. Teaching with computer-mediated communication, http://cei.hagg.umkc.edu/comm./faculty/aitken/sct/sctb/htm