Impairment factors for evaluating the patency of drug-eluting stents and bare metal stents in coronary arteries by 64-slice computed tomography versus conventional coronary angiography

International Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 130, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 349-356

  Nakamura, Koki ^a   Funabashi, Nobusada ^a   Uehara, Masae ^a   Suzuki, Kazushi ^b   Terao, Makoto ^b   Okubo, Kenji ^b   Mita, Yuzuru ^b   Maeda, Fumiaki ^b   Komuro, Issei ^a  

^a CHIBA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b Awa Medical Association Hospital 1155 Yamamoto   (Japan)

Author keywords

64 slice computed tomography; Bare metal stents; Body mass index; Coronary arteries; Drug eluting stents; Impairment factors

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BARE METAL STENT; BODY MASS; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; DRUG ELUTING STENT; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION; HEART RATE; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESTENOSIS; RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY; STENT;

AGED; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; BODY MASS INDEX; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; DRUG-ELUTING STENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; METALS; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VASCULAR PATENCY;

EID: 55549093117     PISSN: 01675273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.08.104     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Holmes Jr. D.R., Leon M.B., Moses J.W., et al. Analysis of 1-year clinical outcomes in the SIRIUS trial: a randomized trial of a sirolimus-eluting stent versus a standard stent in patients at high risk for coronary restenosis. Circulation 109 (2004) 634-640
2. Moses J.W., Leon M.B., Popma J.J., et al. SIRIUS Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med 349 (2003) 1315-1323
3. Morice M.C., Colombo A., Meier B., et al. REALITY Trial. Investigators sirolimus- vs paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo coronary artery lesions: the REALITY trial: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 295 (2006) 895-904
4. Fine J.J., Hopkins C.B., Ruff N., and Newton F.C. Comparison of accuracy of 64-slice cardiovascular computed tomography with coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 97 (2006) 173-174
5. Achenbach S. Computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 48 (2006) 1919-1928
6. Mollet N.R., Cademartiri F., van Mieghem C.A., et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112 (2005) 2318-2323
7. Hoffmann M.H., Shi H., Schmitz B.L., et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. JAMA 293 (2005) 2471-2478
8. Gilard M., Cornily J.C., Pennec P.Y., et al. Assessment of coronary artery stents by 16 slice computed tomography. Heart 92 (2006) 58-61
9. Schuijf J.D., Bax J.J., Jukema J.W., et al. Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 94 (2004) 427-430
10. Gilard M., Cornily J.C., Rioufol G., et al. Noninvasive assessment of left main coronary stent patency with 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 95 (2005) 110-112
11. Cademartiri F., Mollet N., Lemos P.A., et al. Usefulness of multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol 96 (2005) 799-802
12. Gaspar T., Halon D.A., Lewis B.S., et al. Diagnosis of coronary in-stent restenosis with multidetector row spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46 (2005) 1573-1579
13. Rixe J., Achenbach S., Ropers D., et al. Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. Eur Heart J 27 (2006) 2567-2572
14. Flohr T., Bruder H., Stierstorfer K., Simon J., Schaller S., and Ohnesorge B. New technical developments in multislice CT, part 2: sub-millimeter 16-slice scanning and increased gantry rotation speed for cardiac imaging. Rofo 174 (2002) 1022-1027
15. Funabashi N., Suzuki K., Terao M., et al. New acquisition method to exclusively enhance the left side of the heart by a small amount of contrast material achieved by multislice computed tomography with 64 data acquisition system. Int J Cardiol 114 (2007) 265-269
16. Judkins M.P. Selective coronary arteriography: a percutaneous transfemoral technique. Radiology 89 (1967) 815-824
17. Hoffmann U., Moselewski F., Cury R.C., et al. Predictive value of 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography to detect significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease: patient- versus segment-based analysis. Circulation 110 (2004) 2638-2643
18. Leschka S., Alkadhi H., Plass A., et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 26 (2005) 1482-1487
19. Raff G.L., Gallagher M.J., O'Neill W.W., and Goldstein J.A. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46 (2005) 552-557
20. Narumi H., Funabashi N., Takano H., et al. Remarkable thickening of right atrial wall in subjects with cardiac amyloidosis complicated with sick sinus syndrome. Int J Cardiol 119 (2007) 222-224
21. Funabashi N., Asano M., and Komuro I. Predictors of non-calcified plaques in the coronary arteries of 242 subjects using multislice computed tomography and logistic regression models. Int J Cardiol 117 (2007) 191-197
22. Funabashi N., Misumi K., Ohnishi H., Asano M., and Komuro I. Characterization and morphology of atherosclerotic plaque of coronary arteries: utility of electron-beam tomography to detect non calcified plaque: a comparison with conventional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Int J Cardiol 115 (2007) 108-113
23. Funabashi N., Maeda F., Nakamura K., et al. Patency of the left coronary artery by 64-slice multislice computed tomography following implantation of sirolimus-eluting stent. Int J Cardiol 111 (2006) 333-335
24. Funabashi N., Komiyama N., Kato H., Umekita H., Asano M., and Komuro I. Retrospective ECG-gated left ventriculography using multislice CT following left ventricular bolus injection and evaluation of its utility and motion artifact at every cardiac phase. Int J Cardiol 113 (2006) 132-138
25. Nieman K., Rensing B.J., van Geuns R.J., et al. Non-invasive coronary angiography with multislice spiral computed tomography: impact of heart rate. Heart 88 (2002) 470-474
26. Stanford W., Burns T.L., Thompson B.H., Witt J.D., Lauer R.M., and Mahoney L.T. Influence of body size and section level on calcium phantom measurements at coronary artery calcium CT scanning. Radiology 230 (2004) 198-205
27. Husmann L., Alkadhi H., Boehm T., et al. Influence of cardiac hemodynamic parameters on coronary artery opacification with 64-slice computed tomography. Eur Radiol 16 (2006) 1111-1116
28. Becker C.R., Hong C., Knez A., et al. Optimal contrast application for cardiac 4-detector-row computed tomography. Invest Radiol 38 (2003) 690-694
29. Yoshimura N., Sabir A., Kubo T., Lin P.J., Clouse M.E., and Hatabu H. Correlation between image noise and body weight in coronary CTA with 16-row MDCT. Acad Radiol 13 (2006) 324-328
30. Husmann L., Leschka S., Boehm T., et al. Influence of body mass index on coronary artery opacification in 64-slice CT angiography. Rofo 178 (2006) 1007-1013