Test accommodations in geriatric neuropsychology

Geriatric Neuropsychology: Practice Essentials

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 97-114

  Caplan, Bruce ^a   Shechter, Judith A ^b  

^a LANKENAU HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 55549085828     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203943403-19     Document Type: Chapter

References (64)

1. Albert, M. (1988). Assessment of cognitive dysfunction. In M. S. Albert & M. B. Moss (Eds.), Geriatric neuropsychology (pp. 57-81). New York: Guilford Press.
2. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
3. American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597-1611.
4. American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57(12), 1060-1073.
5. American Psychological Association. (2004). Guidelines for psychological practice with older adults. American Psychologist, 59(4), 236-260.
6. Beauvais, J. E., Woods, S. P., Delaney, R. C., & Fein, D. (2004). The development of a tactile Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Rehabilitation Psychology, 49(4), 282-287.
7. Behuniak, P. (2002). Types of commonly requested accommodations. In R. B. Ekstrom & D. K. Smith (Eds.), Assessing individuals with disabilities in educational, employment, and counseling settings (pp. 45-58). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
8. Berninger, V., Gans, B., St. James, P., & Connors, T. (1988). Modified WAIS-R for patients with speech and/or hand dysfunction. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 69, 250-255.
9. Braden, J. P. (2003). Accommodating clients with disabilities on the WAIS-III and WMS. In D. S. Tulsky, D. H. Saklofske, G. J. Chelune, R. K. Heaton, R. J. Ivnik, R. Bornstein, et al. (Eds.), Clinical interpretation of the WAIS-III and WMS-III (pp. 451-486). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
10. Bush, S. (2000a). Intermanual differences in performing a visuoconstructional task. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81, 1151-1152.
11. Bush, S. (2000b). Intermanual visuoconstructional differences in rehabilitation patients. Journal of Cognitive Rehabilitation, 18, 10-13.
12. Bush, S., & Martin, T. A. (2004). Intermanual differences on the Rey Complex Figure Test. Rehabilitation Psychology, 49(1), 76-78.
13. Canter, M. B., Bennett, B. E., Jones, S. E., & Nagy, T. F. (1994). Ethics for psychologists. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
14. Caplan, B., & Shechter, J. (1995). Nonstandard neuropsychological assessment: History, rationale, and examples. In L. Cushman & M. Scherer (Eds.), Psychological assessment in medical rehabilitation (pp. 359-381). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15. Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 US S. Ct. (1993).
16. Ekstrom, R. B., & Smith, D. K. (2002). Introduction. In R. B. Ekstrom & D. K. Smith (Eds.), Assessing individuals with disabilities in educational, employment, and counseling settings (pp. 3-8). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
17. Ferraro, F. R., Barth, J., Morton, M., & Whetham, T. (1997). Stimulus size effects in Boston Naming Test performance in younger and older adults. Applied Neuropsychology, 4, 249-251.
18. Fitz, A., Conrad, D., & Sarff, P. (1992). Hooper visual organization test performance in lateralized brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 7, 243-250.
19. Foote, W. E. (2002). The clinical assessment of people with disabilities. In R. B. Ekstrom & D. K. Smith (Eds.), Assessing individuals with disabilities in educational, employment, and counseling settings (pp. 103-120). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
20. Fozard, J. (1990). Vision and hearing in aging. In J. Birren & K. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (3rd ed., pp. 150-170). New York: Guilford Press.
21. Gaudette, M. D., & Smith, J. A. (1998). Process-oriented administration of the picture arrangement test does not affect the quantitative outcome. Applied Neuropsychology, 5(3), 154-158.
22. Geisinger, K. F., Boodoo, G., & Noble, J. P. (2002). The psychometrics of testing individuals with disabilities. In R. B. Ekstrom & D. K. Smith (Eds.), Assessing individuals with disabilities in educational, employment, and counseling settings (pp. 33-42). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
23. Golden, C. J., & Robbins, D. E. (1985). Considerations in cases of visual, auditory, or motor impairment. In D. P. Swiercinsky (Ed.), Testing adults: A reference guide for special psychodiagnostic assessments (pp. 89-100). Kansas City, MO: Test Corporation of America.
24. Green, J. (2000). Neuropsychological evaluation of the older adult: A clinician’s guidebook. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
25. Hanson, S., Kerkhoff, T., & Bush, S. (2005). Health care ethics for psychologists. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
26. Heaton, S., & Heaton, R. (1981). Testing the impaired patient. In S. B. Filskov & T. J. Boll (Eds.), Handbook of clinical neuropsychology (pp. 526-544). New York: Wiley.
27. Heaton, R., Miller, S. W., Taylor, M. J., & Grant, I. (2004). Revised comprehensive norms for an expanded Halstead-Reitan battery. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
28. Hibbard, M. R., & Gordon, W. A. (1992). The comprehensive psychological assessment of individuals with stroke. Neurorehabilitation, 2, 9-20.
29. Hollenbeck, K. (2002). Determining what test alterations are valid accommodations or modifications for large-scale assessment. In G. Tindal & T. M. Haladyna (Eds.), Large-scale assessment programs for all students (pp. 395-425). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
30. Hooper, H. (1958). The Hooper visual organization test manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
31. Horowitz, T., & Caplan, B. (1998). Dominant and nondominant hand performance on the Trail Making Test. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 13, 71-72.
32. Ingles, J., Eskes, G., & Phillips, S. (1999). Fatigue after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80, 173-178.
33. Jastak, S., & Wilkinson, D. (1984). Wide Range Achievement Test-revised administration manual. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.
34. Kaplan, E., Fein, D., Morris, R., & Delis, D. C. (1991). WAIS-R as a neuropsychological instrument. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
35. Kline, D., & Scialfa, C. (1996). Visual and auditory aging. In J. Birren & K. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (4th ed., pp. 181-203). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
36. Lee, D., Reynolds, C. R., & Willson, V. L. (2003). Standardized test administration: Why bother? Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 3(3), 55-81.
37. Lezak, M. (1986). Neuropsychological assessment. In L. Teri & P. M. Lewinsohn (Eds.), Geropsychological assessment and treatment (pp. 3-37). New York: Springer Publishing Company.
38. Lezak, M. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
39. LoSasso, G. L., Rapport, L. J., Axelrod, B. N., & Reeder, K. P. (1998). Intermanual and alternate-form equivalence on the Trail Making Tests. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 20, 107-110.
40. Lou, J., Kerns, G., Oken, B., Sexton, G., & Nutt, J. (2000). Exacerbated physical fatigue and mental fatigue in Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders, 16, 190-196.
41. Mehrens, W. A., & Ekstrom, R. B. (2002). Score reporting issues in the assessment of people with disabilities: Policies and practices. In R. B. Ekstrom & D. K. Smith (Eds.), Assessing individuals with disabilities in educational, employment, and counseling settings (pp. 87-100). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
42. Mendoza, J. (2001). Reporting the results of the neuropsychological evaluation. In C. G. Armengol, E. Kaplan, & E. J. Moes (Eds.), The consumer-oriented neuropsychological report (pp. 95-122). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
43. Messick, S. A. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741-749.
44. Morris, R. G. (2004). Neuropsychology of older adults. In L. H. Goldstein & J. E. McNeil (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology: A practical guide to assessment and management for clinicians (pp. 301-318). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
45. Nelson, P. A., Dial, J. G., & Joyce, A. (2002). Validation of the cognitive test for the blind as a measure of intellectual functioning. Rehabilitation Psychology, 47(2), 184-193.
46. Phillips, S. E. (1993). Testing condition accommodations for disabled students. West’s Education Law Quarterly, 2(2), 366-389.
47. Phillips, S. E. (1994). High-stakes testing accommodations: Validity versus disabled rights. Applied Measurement in Education, 7(2), 93-120.
48. Price, J. R., Mount, G. R., & Coles, E. A. (1987). Evaluating the visually impaired: Neuropsychological techniques. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 81, 28-30.
49. Reitan, R., & Wolfson, D. (1985). The Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery: Theory and clinical interpretation. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.
50. Rockey, L. A. (1997). Memory assessment of the older adult. In P. D. Nussbaum (Ed.), Handbook of neuropsychology and aging (pp. 385-393). New York: Plenum Press.
51. Ruchinskas, R. A., & Curylo, K. J. (2003). Cognitive screening in geriatric rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Psychology, 48(1), 14-22.
52. Schaie, K. W. (1974). Translations in gerontology from lab to life: Intellectual functioning. American Psychologist, 29, 802-807.
53. Schaie, K. W. (1985). Manual for the Schaie-Thurstone test of adult mental abilities. Mountain View, CA: Consulting Psychologists’ Press. Available from the author, Penn State Gerontology Center, 105 Henderson S, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802.
54. Schultheis, M. T., Caplan, B., Ricker, J. H., & Woessner, R. (2000). Fractioning the Hooper: A multiple-choice response format. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 14(2), 196-210.
55. Smith, D. (2002). The decision-making process for developing testing accommodations. In R. B. Ekstrom & D. K. Smith (Eds.), Assessing individuals with disabilities in educational, employment, and counseling settings (pp. 71-86). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
56. Spreen, O., & Strauss, E. (1998). A compendium of neuropsychological tests. New York: Oxford University Press.
57. Storandt, M., & Futterman, A. (1982). Stimulus size and performance on two subtests of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale by younger and older adults. Journal of Gerontology, 37(5), 602-603.
58. Thurstone, L. L., & Thurstone, T. G. (1962). Primary Mental Abilities Test, Revised. Chicago: Science Research Associates.
59. Toyokura, M., Sawatari, M., Nishimura, Y., & Ishida, A. (2003). Nondominant hand performance of the Japanese Trail Making Test and its mirror version. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 691-693.
60. Tuokko, H., & Hadjistavropoulos, T. (1998). An assessment guide to geriatric neuropsychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
61. Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.
62. Willingham, W. W., Ragosta, M., Bennett, R. E., Braun, H., Rock, D. A., & Powers, D. (1988). Testing handicapped people. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
63. Wilson, B. C. (1986). An approach to neuropsychological assessment of the preschool child with developmental deficits. In S. B. Filskov & T. J. Boll (Eds.), Handbook of clinical neuropsychology (Vol. 2, pp. 121-171). New York: Wiley.
64. York, C., & Cermak, S. (1995). Visual perception and praxis in adults after stroke. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49, 543-550.