Development of a tactile Wisconsin Card Sorting Test

Rehabilitation Psychology

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 282-287

  Beauvais, John E ^a,b,g   Delaney, Richard C ^b,c   Woods, Steven Paul ^d,f   Fein, Deborah ^e  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Gaylord Hospital   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g Psychology Service (116B)   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTELLIGENCE TEST; MALE; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; REHABILITATION CENTER; UNITED STATES; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; WISCONSIN CARD SORTING TEST;

EID: 9244231770     PISSN: 00905550     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0090-5550.49.4.282     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Adams, R. D., & Victor, M. (1993). Principles of neurology (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
2. Baldessarini, R. J., Finklestein, S., & Arana, G. W. (1983). The predictive power of diagnostic tests and the effect of prevalence of illness. Archives of General Psychiatry, 40, 569-573.
3. Berg, E. A. (1948). A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking. Journal of General Psychology, 39, 15-22.
4. Bowers, S., & Marshall, L. (1980). Outcome in 200 consecutive cases of severe head injury treated in San Diego County: A prospective analysis. Neurosurgery, 6, 237-242.
5. Caplan, B., & Shechter, J. (1995). The role of nonstandard neuropsychological assessment in rehabilitation: History, rationale, and examples. In L. Cushman & M. Scherer (Eds.), Psychological assessment in medical rehabilitation: Measurement and instrumentation in psychology (pp. 359-391). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6. Cope, D. N., Cole, J. R., Hall, K. M., & Barkan, H. (1991). Brain injury: Analysis of outcome in a post acute rehabilitation system. Part 1: General analysis. Brain Injury, 5(2), 111-125.
7. Corcoran, R., & Upton, D. (1993). A role for the hippocampus in card sorting? Cortex, 29(2), 293-304.
8. Demakis, G. J. (2003). A meta-analytic review of the sensitivity of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test to frontal and lateralized frontal brain damage. Neuropsychology, 17(2), 255-264.
9. Grant, D. A., & Berg, E. A. (1948). A behavioral analysis of degree of impairment and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card sorting problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 404-411.
10. Heaton, R. K., Chelune, G. J., Talley, J. L., Kay, G. G., & Curtis, G. (1993). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) manual - Revised and expanded. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
11. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
12. Heller, M. A. (1989). Texture perception in sighted and blind observers. Perception and Psychophysics, 45, 49-54.
13. Heller, M. A. (1991). Introduction. In M. A. Heller & W. Schiff (Eds.), The psychology of touch (pp. 1-19). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Heller, M. A., & Kennedy, J. M. (1990). Perspective taking, pictures and the blind. Perception and Psychophysics, 48, 459-466.
15. Jones, B., & O'Neill, S. (1985). Combining vision and touch in texture perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 37, 66-72.
16. Klatzky, R. L., Lederman, S. J., & Metzger, V. A. (1985). Identifying objects by touch: An expert system. Perception and Psychophysics, 37, 299-302.
17. Kline, L. B., Mortawetz, R. B., & Swaid, S. N. (1984). Indirect injury of the optic nerve. Neurosurgery, 14, 756-764.
18. Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Nelson, P. A., Dial, J. G., & Joyce, A. (2002). Validation of the Cognitive Test for the Blind as an assessment of intellectual functioning. Rehabilitation Psychology, 47, 184-193.
20. Price, J. R., Mount, G. R., & Coles, E. A. (1987). Evaluating the visually impaired: Neuropsychological techniques. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 81, 28-30.
21. Psychological Corporation. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Third edition Wechsler Memory Scale - Third edition: Technical manual. San Antonio, TX: Author.
22. Spreen, O., & Strauss, E. (1998). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23. Statistical record of health and medicine. (1995). Detroit, MI: Gale Research.
24. Stuss, D. T., Benson, D. F., Kaplan, E. F., Weir, W. S., Naeser, M. A., Lieberman, I., & Ferrill, D. (1983). The involvement of orbital-frontal cerebrum in cognitive tasks. Neuropsychologia, 21, 235-248.
25. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1996). Statistical abstract of the United States: 1996. (116th ed.) Washington, DC: Author.
26. Veterans Health Administration. (1996, April). Coordinated services for blinded veterans (Publication no. IB 11-59, Rev.). Washington, DC: Department of Veterans Affairs.
27. Warren, D. H., & Rossano, M. J. (1991). Intermodality relations: Vision and touch. In M. A. Heller & W. Schiff (Eds.), The psychology of touch (pp. 119-137). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Woods, S. P., Weinborn, M., & Lovejoy, D. W. (2003). Are classification accuracy statistics underused in neuropsychological research? Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 25, 431-439.