Frame of reference models in psychophysics: A perceptual-cognitive approach

Psychophysics Beyond Sensation: Laws and Invariants of Human Cognition

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 69-88

  Sarris, Viktor ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 55449105785     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410610744     Document Type: Chapter

References (65)

1. Atkinson, J., & Braddick, O. (1999). Research methods in infant vision, In R.H.S. Carpenter & J.G. Robson (Eds.), Vision research: A practical guide to laboratory methods (pp. 161-186). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
2. Baird, J.C. (1997). Sensation and judgment: Complementary theory of psychophysics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Bateson, P., & Horn, G. (1994). Imprinting and recognition memory: A neural net model. Animal Behaviour, 48, 695-715.
4. Blake, R. (1999). The behavioral analysis of animal vision, In R.H.S. Carpenter & J.G. Robson (Eds.), Vision research: A practical guide to laboratory methods (pp. 137-160). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
5. Bouton, M.E., Nelson, J.B., & Rosas, J.M. (1999a). Stimulus generalization, context change, and forgetting. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 171-186.
6. Bouton, M.E., Nelson, J.B., & Rosas, J.M. (1999b). Resolution now! Reply to Riccio, Richardson, and Ebner (l999). Psychological Bulletin, 125, 190-192.
7. Cangöz, B.N. (1999). Wahrnehmungs- und Urteilsrelativität bei Erwachsenen und Kindern: Psychophysikalische Bezugssystemeffekte in der Zeitwahrneh mung. [Perceptual-judgmental relativity in grown-ups and children: Psychophysical frame-of-reference effects in time perception]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Lang.
8. Chun, M.M. (2000). Context as cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 170-178.
9. Dassler, K. (2000). Altersspezifische Kontexteffekte bei der Wahrnehmung und Beurteilung von Reizgrössen. [Age-related context effects in the perception and judgment of stimulus-sizes.] Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universität Frankfurt.
10. Dassler, K., & Sarris, V. (1997, July). Context effects in psychophysics: Size judgments with different age groups. Paper presented at the Vth European Congress of Psychology, Dublin, Ireland.
11. Dewsbury, D.A. (1989). Comparative psychology, ethology, and animal behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 581-602.
12. Dewsbury, D.A. (1992). Comparative psychology and ethology: A reassessment. American Psychologist, 47, 208-215.
13. Dresp, B. (1999). Dynamic characteristics of spatial mechanisms coding contour structures. Spatial Vision, 12, 129-142.
14. Ehrenstein, W.H., & Ehrenstein, A. (1999). Psychophysical methods, In U. Windhorst & H. Johansson (Eds.), Modern techniques in neuroscience research (pp. 1211-1241). Berlin: Springer.
15. Elfering, A., & Sarris, V. (2003). Time-dependence of context effects in memory psychophysics: Evidence from a visual delayed-matching task. Manuscript in preparation.
16. Farell, B., & Pelli, D.G. (1999). Psychophysical methods, or how to measure a threshold, and why, In R.H.S. Carpenter & J.G. Robson (Eds.), Vision research: A practical guide to laboratory methods (pp. 129-136). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
17. Garner, W.R. (1954). Context effects and the validity of loudness scales. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 218-224.
18. Gescheider, G.A. (1988). Psychophysical scaling. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 169-200.
19. Gregson, R.A.M. (1988). Nonlinear psychophysical dynamics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Grossberg, S. (1999). How does the cerebral cortex work? Learning, attention, and grouping by the laminar circuits of visual cortex. Spatial Vision, 12, 163-187.
21. Grossberg, S. (2000). The complementary brain: Unifying brain dynamics and modularity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 233-246.
22. Hauf, P. (2001). Untersuchungen zum altersspezifischen mehrdimensionalen perzeptivkognitiven Urteilsverhalten in der Psychophysik. [Experiments on age-related multidimensional perceptualcognitive behavior in psychophysics.] In F. Wilkening, O. Güntürkün, T. Rammsayer, V. Sarris, & F. Strack (Eds.), Psychologia Universalis, Neue Reihe (Bd. 26). Lengerich, Berlin: Pabst.
23. Hauf, P., Arlt, M., & Sarris, V. (2000, August-September). Developmental visual psychophysics: New size-perception data from baby chicks. Poster presented at the 16th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics, Strasbourg, France (Abstract).
24. Hauf, P, & Sarris, V. (1999, November). Age-related development of multidimensional judgment strategies in psychophysics: Size, color and brightness dimensions combined. Poster presented at the 40th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles, CA (Abstract).
25. Helson, H. (1947). Adaptation-level as frame of reference for prediction of psychophysical data. American Journal of Psychology, 60, 1-29.
26. Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation-level theory. New York: Harper & Row.
27. Honey, R.C., & Bolhuis, J.J. (1997). Imprinting, conditioning, and within-event learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50B, 97-110.
28. Honey, R.C., Horn, G., & Bateson, P. (1993). Perceptual learning during filial imprinting: Evidence from transfer of training studies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46B, 253-269.
29. Honey, R.C., Horn, G., Bateson, P., & Walpole, M. (1995). Functionally distinct memories for imprinting stimuli: Behavioral and neural dissociations. Behavioral Neuroscience, 109, 689-698.
30. Johnson, M.H. (1997). Developmental cognitive neuroscience: An introduction. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
31. Johnson, M.H. (1999). Developmental cognitive neuroscience, In M. Bennett (Ed.), Developmental psychology: Achievements and prospects (pp. 147-164). London: Psychology Press.
32. Laming, D. (1986). Psychophysics, In R.L. Gregory (Ed.), The Oxford companion to the mind (pp. 655-659). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
33. Laming, D. (1997). The measurement of sensation. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
34. Lockhead, G.R. (1992). Psychophysical scaling: Judgments of attributes or objects? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 543-601.
35. Marks, L.E. (1974). Sensory psychophysics: The new psychophysics. New York: Academic Press.
36. Marks, L.E. (1991). The dynamics of ratio scaling, In S.J. Bolonowski & G.A. Gescheider (Ed.), Ratio scaling of psychological magnitude (pp. 27-42). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Marks, L.E. (1992). The contingency of perceptual processing: Context modifies equal-loudness relations. Psychological Science, 3, 285-291.
38. Marks, L.E., & Algom, D. (1998). Psychophysical scaling, In M.H. Birnbaum (Ed.), Handbook of perception and cognition: Measurement, judgment, and decision making (2nd ed., pp. 81-178). New York: Academic Press.
39. Parducci, A. (1965). Category judgment: A range-frequency model. Psychological Review, 72, 407-418.
40. Parducci, A. (1983). Category ratings and the relational character of judgment, In H.-G. Geissler, H.F.J.M. Buffart, E.L.J. Leeuwenberg, & V. Sarris (Eds.), Modern issues in perception (pp. 262-282). Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.
41. Parducci, A. (1995). Happiness, pleasure, and judgment: The contextual theory and its applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42. Pearce, J.M. (1994). Discrimination and categorization, In N.J. Mackintosh (Ed.), Animal learning and cognition: Handbook of perception and cognition (pp. 109-134). New York: Academic Press.
43. Riccio, D. C, Richardson, R., & Ebner, D.L. (1999). Comment on Bouton, Nelson, and Rosas (1999). Psychological Bulletin, 125, 187-189.
44. Sander, K. (1998). Das "Two-Stimulus Two-Choice"-Paradigma für die Psychophysik: Range-Frequency-Modell und Adaptationsniveau-Theorie im Vergleich. [The two-stimulus two-choice paradigm in psychophysics: Range-frequency model and adaptation-level theory compared.] (Edition Wissenschaft, Reihe Psychologie, Bd. 57). Marburg, Germany: Tectum.
45. Sander, K., & Sarris, V. (1997). Das "Two-Stimulus Two-Choice"-Paradigma für die Psychophysik: Range-Frequency-Modell und Adaptation-Level-Theorie im Vergleich. [The two-stimulus two-choice paradigm in psychophysics: Range-frequency model and adaptation-level theory compared.] Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 44, 431-446.
46. Sarris, V. (1915). Wahrnehmung und Urteil: Bezugssystemeffekte in der Psychophysik [Perception and judgment: Frame-of-Reference Effects in Psychophysics.] (2nd ed.) Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
47. Sarris, V. (1976). Effects of stimulus range and anchor value on psychophysical judgment, In H.-G. Geissler & Y.M. Zabrodin (Eds.), Advances in psychophysics (pp. 253-268). Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.
48. Sarris, V. (1990). Contextual effects in animal psychophysics: A comparative analysis of the chicken's perceptual relativity. European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 10, 475-489.
49. Sarris, V. (1994). Contextual effects in animal psychophysics: Comparative perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 763-764.
50. Sarris, V. (1998). Frame-of-reference effects in psychophysics: New experimental findings with baby chicks. Psychologia (Greece), 5, 95-102.
51. Sarris, V. (2000). Perception and judgment in psychophysics: An introduction into the frame-of-reference theories, In A. Schick, M. Meis, & C. Reckhardt (Eds.), Contributions to psychological acoustics (pp. 39-62). Oldenburg, Germany: BIS.
52. Sarris, V. (2001). Frame-of-reference conceptions and context effects in psychophysics, In E. Sommerfeld, R. Kompass, & T. Lachmann (Eds.), Fechner Day 2001. Proceedings of the International Society for Psychophysics (pp. 155-160). Lengerich, Berlin: Pabst.
53. Sarris, V., Hauf, P., & Szczepanski, M. (1998, August). The visual psychophysics of baby chicks: New context-dependent color and size data. Poster presented at the 21 st European Conference on Visual Perception, Oxford.
54. Sarris, V., Hofer, G., & Zoeke, B. (1990). The chicken's visual psychophysics: Two-dimensional effects, In F. Müller (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics (pp. 222-227). Würzburg, Germany: University Press.
55. Sarris, V., & Parducci, A. (1978). Multiple anchoring of category rating scales. Perception and Psychophysics, 24, 35-39.
56. Sarris, V., & Parducci, A. (Organizers). (1984, August). Psychophysics beyond sensation. Invited symposium at the XXIIIrd International Congress of Psychology, Acapulco, Mexico.
57. Sarris, V., & Zoeke, B. (1985). Tests of a quantitative frame-of-reference model: Practice effects in psychophysical judgments with different age-groups, In G. d'Ydewalle (Ed.), Cognition, information processing, and motivation (pp. 71-78). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
58. Schneider, B.A., & Trehub, S.E. (1985). Infant auditory psychophysics: An overview, In G. Gottlieb & N.A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Measurement of audition and vision in the first year of postnatal life (pp. 127-155). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
59. Stevens, S.S. (1975). Psychophysics: Introduction to its perceptual, neural, and social prospects. New York: Wiley.
60. Teller, D.Y. (1983). Measurement of visual acuity in human and monkey infants: The interface between laboratory and clinic. Behavioural and Brain Research, 10, 15-23.
61. Teller, D.Y. (2000). Visual development: Psychophysics, neural substrates, and causal stories, In M.S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (2nd ed., pp. 73-81). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
62. Thomas, D.R. (1993). A model for adaptation-level effects on stimulus generalization. Psychological Review, 100, 658-673.
63. Weintraub, D.J. (1975). Perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 26, 263-269.
64. Wertheimer, M. (1959). On discrimination experiments: I. Two logical structures. Psychological Review, 66, 252-266.
65. Zoeke, B., & Sarris, V. (1983). A comparison of "frame of reference" paradigms in human and animal psychophysics, In H.-G. Geissler, H.F.J.M. Buffart, E.L.J. Leeuwenberg, & V. Sarris (Eds.), Modern issues in perception (pp. 283-317). Amsterdam: North-Holland.