Set recognition as a window to perceptual and cognitive processes

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 70, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1165-1184

  Jacob, Michal ^a   Hochstein, Shaul ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COGNITION; HUMAN; LEARNING; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; VISION;

ALGORITHMS; COGNITION; HUMANS; LEARNING; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 55449096458     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PP.70.7.1165     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. AHISSAR, M., & HOCHSTEIN, S. (1997). Task difficulty and the specificity of perceptual learning. Nature, 387, 401-406.
2. AHISSAR, M., & HOCHSTEIN, S. (2004). The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 457-464.
3. ASHBY, G. F., & MADDOX, T. W. (2005). Human category learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 149-178.
4. ASHBY, G. F., QUELLER, S., & BERRETTY, P. M. (1999). On the dominance of unidimensional rules in unsupervised categorization. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1178-1199.
5. BERG, E. A. (1948). A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking. Journal of General Psychology, 39, 15-22.
6. BOWDEN, E. M., & JUNG-BEEMAN, M. (2003). Aha! Insight experience correlates with solution activation in the right hemisphere. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 730-737.
7. BOWER, G., & TRABASSO, T. (1963). Reversals prior to solution in concept identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 409-418.
8. CARR, T. H. (1992). Automaticity and cognitive anatomy: Is word recognition "automatic"? American Journal of Psychology, 105, 201-237.
9. CORBALLIS, M. C. (1998). Interhemispheric neural summation in the absence of the corpus callosum. Brain, 121, 1795-1807.
10. EGETH, H. E., & MORDKOFF, J. T. (1991). Redundancy gain revisited: Evidence for parallel processing of separable dimensions. In G. R. Lockhead & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), The perception of structure: Essays in honor of Wendell R. Garner (pp. 131-143). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
11. GARNER, W. R., & LEE, W. (1962). An analysis of redundancy in perceptual discrimination. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 15, 367-388.
12. GOLDSTONE, R. L. (1994). The role of similarity in categorization: Providing a groundwork. Cognition, 52, 125-157.
13. GOLDSTONE, R. L. (1998). Perceptual learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 585-612.
14. GOLDSTONE, R. L., & BARSALOU, L. W. (1998). Reuniting perception and conception. Cognition, 65, 231-262.
15. GRAHAM, N. V. S. (1989). Visual pattern analyzers. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. GRANT, D. A., & BERG, E. (1948). A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card sorting problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 404-411.
17. HAMMER, R., DIESENDRUCK, G., WEINSHALL, D., & HOCHSTEIN, S. (2008). The development of category learning strategies: What makes the difference? Manuscript submitted for publication.
18. HAMMER, R., HERTZ, T., HOCHSTEIN, S., & WEINSHALL, D. (2005). Category learning from equivalence constraints. Cognitive Sciences, 27(Suppl.), 893-898.
19. HAMMER, R., HERTZ, T., HOCHSTEIN, S., & WEINSHALL, D. (2007). Classification with positive and negative equivalence constraints: Theory, computation and human experiments. In F. Mele, G. Ramella, S. Santillo, & F. Ventriglia (Eds.), Brain, vision, and artificial intelligence (pp. 264-276). Berlin: Springer.
20. HAMMER, R., HERTZ, T., HOCHSTEIN, S., & WEINSHALL, D. (in press). Category learning from equivalence constraints. Cognitive Processing.
21. HEATON, R. K., CHELUNE, G. J., TALLEY, J. L., KAY, G. C., & CURTISS, G. (1993). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test manual, revised and expanded. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
22. HOCHSTEIN, S., & AHISSAR, M. (2002). View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron, 36, 791-804.
23. HOLYOAK, K. J. (1990). Problem solving. In D. N. Osherson & E. E. Smith (Eds.), Thinking: An invitation to cognitive science (Vol. 3, pp. 117-146). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. KOFFKA, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace.
25. KÖHLER, W. (1929). Gestalt psychology. New York: Liversight.
26. LANDY, D., & GOLDSTONE, R. L. (2007). How abstract is symbolic thought? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 720-733.
27. MEDIN, D. L. (1973). Measuring and training dimensional preferences. Child Development, 44, 359-362.
28. MEDIN, D. L., WATTENMAKER, W. D., & HAMPSON, S. E. (1987). Family resemblance, conceptual cohesiveness, and category construction. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 242-279.
29. MILLER, J. (1982). Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 247-279.
30. MILLER, J. (1986). Timecourse of coactivation in bimodal divided attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 331-343.
31. MONNIER, P. (2006). Detection of multidimensional targets in visual search. Vision Research, 46, 4083-4090.
32. OLIVA, A., & TORRALBA, A. (2006). Building the gist of a scene: The role of global image features in recognition. Progress in Brain Research, 155, 23-36.
33. POMERANTZ, J. R. (2002). Perception: Overview. In R. A. Wilson & F. C. Keil (Eds.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science (pp. 527-537). London: Nature Publishing.
34. RAAB, D. H. (1962). Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 24, 574-590.
35. REGEHR, G., & BROOKS, L. R. (1993). Perceptual manifestations of an analytic structure: The priority of holistic individuation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 92-114.
36. ROSCH, E., & MERVIS, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-605.
37. ROSCH, E., MERVIS, C. B., GRAY, W. D., JOHNSON, D. M., & BOYES-BRAEM, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382-439.
38. RUBIN, N., NAKAYAMA, K., & SHAPLEY, R. (1997). Abrupt learning and retinal size specificity in illusory contour perception. Current Biology, 7, 461-467.
39. SCHYNS, P. G., BONNAR, L., & GOSSELIN, F. (2002). Show me the features! Understanding recognition from the use of visual information. Psychological Science, 13, 402-409.
40. SCHYNS, P. G., & OLIVA, A. (1994). From blobs to boundary edges: Evidence for time and spatial scale dependent scene recognition. Psychological Science, 5, 195-200.
41. SMITH, M. L., GOSSELIN, F., & SCHYNS, P. G. (2006). Perceptual moments of conscious visual experience inferred from oscillatory brain activity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 5626-5631.
42. STROOP, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
43. TOWNSEND, J. T., & ASHBY, F. G. (1983). Stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. TREISMAN, A., VIEIRA, A., & HAYES, A. (1992). Automaticity and preattentive processing. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 341-362.
45. TVERSKY, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352.
46. ULLMAN, S. (1984). Visual routines. Cognition, 18, 97-159.