Anthropomorphism and animism in early years science: Why teachers use them, how they conceptualise them and what are their views on their use

Research in Science Education

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 291-311

  Kallery, Maria ^a,b   Psillos, Dimitris ^a  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

^b NONE   (Greece)

Author keywords

Animism in science; Anthropomorphism in science; Early years science; Metaphors in science; Personification in science; Teachers' knowledge in science; Teachers' personification; Teachers' views on anthropomorphism

Indexed keywords

EID: 5544229620     PISSN: 0157244X     EISSN: 15731898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:RISE.0000044613.64634.03     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bell, C. R. (1954). Additional data on animistic thinking. Scientific Monthly, 79, 67-69.
2. Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Cohen, L.,&Manion, L. (1997). Research methods of education. London: Routledge.
4. Crannell, C. N. (1954). Responses of college students to a questionnaire on animistic thinking. Scientific Monthly, 78, 54-56.
5. Crowell, D. H.,&Dole, A. A. (1957). Animism and college students. Journal of Educational Research, 50, 391-395.
6. Dennis, W. (1953). Animistic thinking among college and university students. Scientific Monthly, 76, 247-249.
7. Dennis, W. (1957). Animistic thinking among college and high school students in the Near East. Journal of Educational Psychology, 48, 193-198.
8. Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. Science Education, 75(6), 649-672.
9. Friedler, Y., Zohar, A.,&Tamir, P. (1993). The effect of age and of learning on the ability to distinguish between anthropomorphic and teleological explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 15(4), 439-443.
10. Gallant, R. A. (1981). Pitfalls of personification. Science and Children, 19(2), 16-17.
11. Glynn, S. M., Britton, B. K., Semrud-Clikeman, M.,&Muth, K. D. (1989). Analogical reasoning and problem solving in science textbooks. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning,&C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), A handbook of creativity: Assessment, research and theory. New York: Plenum.
12. Hampel, C. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanations. New York: Free Press.
13. Howard, R. (1989). Teaching science with metaphors. School Science Review, 70(252), 100-103.
14. Hughes, A. (1973). Anthropomorphism, teleology, animism, and personification - why they should be avoided. Science and Children, 10 10-11.
15. Inagaki, K.,&Hatano, G. (1987). Young children's spontaneous personification as analogy. Child Development, 58, 1013-1020.
16. Kallery, M. (2001). Early-years educators' attitudes to science and pseudo-science: The case of astronomy and astrology. European Journal of Teacher Education, 24(3), 329-342.
17. Kallery, M.,&Psillos, D. (2001). Preschool teachers' content knowledge in science: Their understanding of elementary science concepts and of issues raised by children's questions. International Journal of Early Years Education, 9(3), 165-179.
18. Kallery, M.,&Psillos, D. (2002). What happens in the early years science classroom? The reality of teachers curriculum implementation activities. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 10 2), 49-61.
19. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Thinking science: Language learning and values Norwood, MA: Ablex.
20. Lowrie, D. E. (1954). Additional data on animistic thinking, Scientific Monthly, 79, 69-70.
21. Looft, W. R.,&Bartz, H. (1969). Animism revived. Psychological Bulletin, 71(1), 1-19.
22. Papalia-Finlay, D. E. (1978). The life concept in female college students: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 7 2), 133-139.
23. Piaget, J. (1951). The child's conception of the world. Savage, MD: Littlefield Adams.
24. Sharefkin, B.,&Ruchlis, H. (1974). Anthropomorphism in the lower grades. Science and Children, 11(6), 37-40.
25. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
26. Simmons, A. J.,&Goss, A. E. (1957). Animistic responses as a function of sentence contexts and instructions. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 91, 181-189.
27. Taber, K. S. (1995). An analogy for discussing progression in learning chemistry. School Science Review, 76(276), 91-95.
28. Taber, K. S.,&Watts, M. (1996). The secret life of the chemical bond: Students' anthropomorphic and animistic references to bonding. International Journal of Science Education, 18(5), 557-568.
29. Tamir, P.,&Zohar, A. (1991). Anthropomorphism and teleology in reasoning about biological phenomena. Science Education, 75(1), 57-67.
30. Treagust, D. F.,&Harrison, A. G. (2000). In search of explanatory frameworks: An analysis of Richard Feynman's lecture 'Atoms in motion.' International Journal of Science Education, 22(11), 1157-1170.
31. Watts, M.,&Bentley, D. (1994). Humanizing and feminising school science: Reviving anthropomorphic and animistic thinking in constructivist science education. International Journal of Science Education, 16(1), 83-97.
32. Zohar, A,&Ginossar, S. (1998). Lifting the taboo regarding teleology and anthropomorphism in biology education - heretical suggestions. Science Education, 82(6), 679-697.