What is at stake in the debate on nonconceptual content?

Nous-Supplement: Philosophical Perspectives

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 55-72

  Bermúdez, José Luis ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 55349148079     PISSN: 15208583     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1520-8583.2007.00120.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bermúdez, J. L. (1995). Nonconceptual content: From perceptual experience to sub-personal computational states. Mind & Language, 10(4), 333-369.
2. Bermúdez, J. L. (2003). Thinking without Words. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Bermúdez, X L. (2005). Philosophy of Psychology: A Contemporary Introduction. London: Routledge.
4. Bermúdez, J. L. (Forthcoming). The distinction between conceptual and nonconceptual content. In B. McLaughlin & A. Beckermann (Eds.). Oxford Handbook to the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Bermúdez, J. L., & Elton, M. (2000). Personal and Subpersonal: Essays on Psychological Explanation (Special Issue of Philosophical Explorations). Philosophical Explorations, 3.
6. Biedermann, I., & Gerhardstein, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1162-1182.
7. Brewer, B. (2005). Perceptual experience has conceptual content. In E. Sosa & M. Steup (Eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
8. Campbell. J. (2005). Information processing, phenomenal consciousness, and Molyneux's question. In J. L. Bermudez (Ed.), Thought, Reference, and Experience: Themes from the Philosophy of Gareth Evans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Chuard, P. (2006). Demonstrative concepts without reidentification. Philosophical Studies, 130, 153-201.
10. Crowther, T. (2006). Two conceptions of conceptualism and nonconceptualism. Erkenntnis, 65, 245-276.
11. Cussins, A. (1990). The connectionist construction of concepts. In M. Boden (Ed.), The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Dennett, D. (1969). Content and Consciousness. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
13. Dokic, J., & Pacherie, E. (2001). Shades and concepts. Analysis, 61, 193-202.
14. Evans, G. (1982). The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Fodor, J. (1983). The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
16. Heck, R. (2000). Nonconceptual content and the space of reasons. The Philosophical Review, 109, 483-523.
17. Kelly, S. D. (2001). Demonstrative concepts and experience. The Philosophical Review, 110, 397-420.
18. McDowell, J. (1994a). Mind and World. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
19. McDowell, J. (1994b). The content of perceptual experience. Philosophical Quarterly, 44, 190-205.
20. McDowell, J. (1998). Replies. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 58, 403-432.
21. Marr, D. (1982). Vision San Francisco: W H. Freeman.
22. Martin, M. (1992). Perception, concepts, and memory. The Philosophical Review, 101, 745-763.
23. Peacocke, C. (1992). A Study of Concepts. Cambodge MA: MIT Press.
24. Peacocke, C. (1998). Nonconceptual content defended. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 58, 381-388.
25. Peacocke, C. (2001). Phenomenology and nonconceptual content. Philosophy and Phenomenalogical Research, 62, 609-616.
26. Speaks, J. (2005). Is there a problem about nonconceptual content? The Philosophical Review, 114, 359-358.
27. Stich, S. (1978). Beliefs and subdoxastic states. Philosophy of Science, 45, 499-518.
28. Strauss, M. S., & Curtis, L. E. (1981). Infant perception of numerosity. Child Development, 52, 1146-1152.
29. Tye, M. (1995). Ten Problems of Consciousness. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
30. Tye, M. (2000). Consciousness, Color, and Content. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
31. Tye, M. (2006). Nonconceptual content, richness, and fineness of grain. In T. G Szabo & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Perceptual Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.