Noninvasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema

Current Opinion in Critical Care

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 531-535

  Masip, Josep ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL DOS DE MAIG   (Spain)

Author keywords

Acute pulmonary edema; Continuous positive airway pressure; Noninvasive pressure support ventilation; Noninvasive ventilation

Indexed keywords

MORPHINE;

CLINICAL TRIAL; EMERGENCY WARD; HEART FAILURE; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LUNG EDEMA; MORTALITY; OXYGEN THERAPY; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PRESSURE SUPPORT VENTILATION; RESPIRATORY TRACT DISEASE; RESPIRATORY TRACT INTUBATION; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SLEEP APNEA SYNDROME; THERAPY EFFECT;

ACUTE DISEASE; CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE; HUMANS; PULMONARY EDEMA; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SHOCK, CARDIOGENIC;

EID: 55349142519     PISSN: 10705295     EISSN: 15317072     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32830c4862     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Nieminen M, Brutsaert D, Dickstein K, et al. Euro Heart Failure Survey II (EHFS II): a survey on hospitalized acute heart failure patients - description of population. Eur Heart J 2006; 27:2725-2736.
2. Mebazaa A, Gheorghiade M, Pina IL, et al. Practical recommendations for prehospital and early in-hospital management of patients presenting with acute heart failure syndromes. Crit Care Med 2008; 36 (Suppl 1 ):S129-S139.
3. Masip J, Roque M, Sánchez B, et al. Noninvasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2005; 294:3124-3130.
4. Peter JV, Moran JL, Phillips-Hughes J, et al. Effect of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) on mortality in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2006; 367:1155-1163.
5. Winck J, Azevedo LF, Costa-Pereira A, et al. Efficacy and safety of noninvasive ventilation in the treatment of acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 2006; 10: R69. doi: 10.1186/CC4905.
6. Fernadez-Vivas M, Caturla-Such J, Gonzalez de la Rosa J, et al. Noninvasive pressure support versus proportional assist ventilation in acute respiratory failure. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29:1126-1133.
7. Tobin MJ. Mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med 1994; 330:1056-1061.
8. Tobin MJ. Advances in mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med 2001; 344:1986-1996.
9. Philip-Joet FF, Paganelli FF, Dutau HL, Saadjian AY. Hemodynamic effects of bilevel nasal positive airway pressure ventilation in patients with heart failure. Respiration 1999; 66:136-143.
10. Naughton MT, Rahman MA, Hara K, et al. Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on intrathoracic and left ventricular transmural pressures in patients with congestive heart failure. Circulation 1995; 91:1725-1731.
11. Chadda K, Annane D, Hart N, et al. Cardiac and respiratory effects of continuous positive airway pressure and noninvasive ventilation in acute cardiac pulmonary edema. Crit Care Med 2002; 30:2457-2461.
12. Pinsky MR, Summer WR, Wise RA, et al. Augmentation of cardiac function by elevation of intrathoracic pressure. J Appl Physiol 1983; 54:950-955.
13. Räsänen J, Heikklä J, Downs J, et al. Continue positive airway pressure by face mask in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Am J Cardiol 1985; 55:296-300.
14. Bersten AD, Holt AW, Vedig AE, et al. Treatment of severe cardiogenic pulmonary edema with continuous positive airway pressure delivered by face mask. N Engl J Med 1991; 325:1825-1830.
15. Lin M, Yang YF, Chiang HT, et al. Reappraisal of continuous positive airway pressure therapy in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Short-term results and long-term follow-up. Chest 1995; 107:1379-1386.
16. Pang D, Keenan SP, Cook DJ, Sibbald WJ. The effect of positive pressure airway support on mortality and need for intubation in cardiogenic pulmonary edema: a systematic review. Chest 1998; 114:1185-1192.
17. Masip J, Betbesé AJ, Páez J, et al. Noninvasive pressure support ventilation versus conventional oxygen therapy in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema: a randomized study. Lancet 2000; 356:2126-2132.
18. Sharon A, Shpirer I, Kaluski E, et al. High-dose intravenous isosorbide-dinitrate is safer and better than Bi-PAP ventilation combined with conventional treatment for severe pulmonary edema. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36:832-837.
19. Kallet RH, Alonso JA, Luce JM, Matthay MA. Exacerbation of acute pulmonary edema during assisted mechanical ventilation using a low tidal volume, lung-protective ventilator strategy. Chest 1999; 116:1826-1832.
20. Nava S, Carbone G, DiBattista N, et al. Noninvasive ventilation in cardiogenic pulmonary edema: a multicenter randomized trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 168:1432-1437.
21. Kelly CA, Newby DE, McDonagh TA, et al. Randomised controlled trial of continuous positive airway pressure and standard oxygen therapy in acute pulmonary oedema; effects on plasma brain natriuretic peptide concentrations. Eur Heart J 2002; 23:1286-1379.
22. L'Her E, Duquesne F, Girou E, et al. Noninvasive continuous positive airway pressure in elderly cardiogenic pulmonary edema patients. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30:882-888.
23. Mehta S, Jay GD, Woolard RH, et al. Randomized, prospective trial of bilevel versus continuous positive airway pressure in acute pulmonary edema. Crit Care Med 1997; 25:620-628.
24. Bellone A, Monari A, Cortellaro F, et al. Myocardial infarction rate in acute pulmonary edema: noninvasive pressure support ventilation versus continuous positive airway pressure. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:1860-1865.
25. Bellone A, Vettorello M, Monari A, et al. Noninvasive pressure support ventilation vs. continuous positive airway pressure in acute hypercapnic pulmonary edema. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31:807-811.
26. Crane SD, Elliott MW, Gilligan P, et al. Randomised controlled comparison of continuous positive airways pressure, bilevel noninvasive ventilation, and standard treatment in emergency department in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. Emerg Med J 2004; 21:155-161.
27. Park M, Lorenzi-Filho G, Feltrim MI, et al. Oxygen therapy, continuous positive airway pressure, or noninvasive bilevel positive pressure ventilation in the treatment of acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Arq Brasil Cardiol 2001; 76:221-230.
28. Park M, Sangean MC, Volpe MC, et al. Randomized, prospective trial of oxygen, continuous positive airway pressure, and bilevel positive airway pressure by face mask in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:2407-2415.
29. Collins SP, Mielniczuk L, Whittingham HA, et al. The use of noninvasive ventilation in emergency department in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema: a systematic review. Ann Emerg Med 2006; 48:260-269.
30. Kwok M Ho, Karen Wong. A comparison of continuous and bi-level positive airway pressure noninvasive ventilation in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a meta-analysis. Crit Care 2006; 10:R49. doi: 10.1186/ CC4861.
31. Nadara S, Prasada N, Taylorb RS, Lipa GYH. Positive pressure ventilation in the management of acute and chronic cardiac failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 2005; 99:171-185.
32. Newby D. Efficacy of noninvasive ventilation in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: the 3CPO trial. Hot line session. Clinical Trial Update. ESC Congress 2007, Vienna. This study was presented in the last European Congress of Cardiology and has not been published yet. More than 1000 patients were assigned into one of the three groups: CPAP, NIPSV or conventional oxygen therapy. It is the largest trial on noninvasive ventilation carried out to date. Both NIV techniques improved the respiratory failure faster but mortality was not different.
33. Masip J, Páez J, Merino M, et al. Risk factors for intubation as a guide for noninvasive ventilation in patients with severe acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29:1921-1928.
34. Craven R, Singletary N, Bosken L, et al. Use of bilevel positive airway pressure in out-of-hospital patients. Acad Emerg Med 2000; 7:1065-1068.
35. 2 on hospital arrival.
36. Hubble MW, Richards ME, Jarvis R, et al. Effectiveness of prehospital continuous positive airway pressure in the management of acute pulmonary edema. Prehosp Emerg Care 2006; 10:430-439.
37. Plaisance P, Pirracchio R, Berton C, et al. A randomized study of out-of-hospital continuous positive airway pressure for acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: physiological and clinical effects. Eur Heart J 2007; 28:2895-2901. This randomized study, including 124 patients, showed that starting CPAP15 min earlier may decrease the intubation rate either in the prehospital setting or during the hospital stay.
38. Rusterholtz T, Kempf J, Berton C, et al. Noninvasive pressure support ventilation with face mask in patients with acute pulmonary edema. Intensive Care Med 1999; 25:21-28.
39. Hoffmann B, Welte T. The use of noninvasive pressure support ventilation for severe respiratory insufficiency due to pulmonary oedema. Intensive Care Med 1999; 25:15-20.
40. Masip J. Noninvasive ventilation. Heart Fail Rev 2007; 12:119-124. The principal aspects of NIV in APE are presented in this review.
41. Moritz F, Brousse B, Gellée B, et al. Continuous positive airway pressure versus bilevel noninvasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Emerg Med 2007; 50:666-675. This randomized study demonstrated that CPAP applied with a Boussignac system or bilevel NIPSV, had similar effects in patients with APE.
42. Dieperink W, Jaarsma T, van der Horst IC, et al. Boussignac continuous positive airway pressure for the management of acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema: prospective study with a retrospective control group. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2007; 7:40.
43. Takeda S, Nejima J, Takano T, et al. Effect of nasal continuous positive airway pressure on pulmonary edema complicating acute myocardial infarction. Jpn Circ J 1998; 62:553-558.
44. Levitt MA. A prospective, randomized trial of BIPAP in severe acute congestive heart failure. J Emerg Med 2001; 21:363-369.
45. Ferrari G, Olliveri F, De Filippi G, et al. Noninvasive positive airway pressure and risk of myocardial infarction in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema: continuous positive airway pressure vs noninvasive positive pressure ventilation. Chest 2007; 132:1804-1809. This randomized trial in patients with APE showed that CPAP or bilevel NIPSV had similar effects. No differences in the myocardial infarction rate and the primary endpoint were seen.
46. Krachman SL, D'Alonzo GE, Berger TJ, Eisen HJ. Comparison of oxygen therapy with nasal continuous positive airway pressure on Cheyne-Stokes respiration during sleep in congestive heart failure. Chest 1999; 116:1550-1557.
47. Sin DD, Logan AG, Fitzgerald FS, et al. Effects of continuous positive airway pressure on cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure patients with and without Cheyne-Stokes respiration. Circulation 2000; 102:61-66.
48. Bradley TD, Logan AG, Kimoff RJ, et al., for CANPAP Investigators. Continuous positive airway pressure for central sleep apnea and heart failure. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:2025-2033.
49. Smith LA, Vennelle M, Gardner RS, et al. Auto-titrating continuous positive airway pressure therapy in patients with chronic heart failure and obstructive sleep apnoea: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Eur Heart J 2007; 28:1221-1227. This study showed an improvement in OSA with the use of CPAP, without impact on heart failure parameters. These results differed slightly from those of the CANPAP trial that demonstrated an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction with the use of CPAP.
50. Arzt M, Floras JS, Logan AG, et al., CANPAP Investigators. Suppression of central sleep apnea by continuous positive airway pressure and transplant-free survival in heart failure: a post hoc analysis of the Canadian Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Patients with Central Sleep Apnea and Heart Failure Trial (CANPAP). Circulation 2007; 115:3173-3180. This is a posthoc analysis of the CANPAP trial. In the original paper, CPAP improved several respiratory and cardiac parameters, with an increase in the LVEF, but these effects did not reduce mortality. However, in this trial transplant-free survival was higher in the CPAP group.