Prehospital noninvasive pressure support ventilation for acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema

European Journal of Emergency Medicine

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 276-279

  Weitz, Gunther ^a   Struck, Jan ^a   Zonak, Andrea ^a   Balnus, Sven ^a   Perras, Boris ^a   Dodt, Christoph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Positive pressure ventilation; Prehospital emergency care; Pulmonary edema

Indexed keywords

FUROSEMIDE; GLYCERYL TRINITRATE; MORPHINE SULFATE;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BLOOD PRESSURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG MEGADOSE; DYSPNEA; EMERGENCY CARE; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; LUNG EDEMA; MALE; OXYGEN SATURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ACUTE DISEASE; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES; FEMALE; HEART FAILURE; HUMANS; MALE; OXYGEN; OXYGEN INHALATION THERAPY; POSITIVE-PRESSURE RESPIRATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PULMONARY EDEMA;

EID: 34548480180     PISSN: 09699546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32826fb377     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Masip J, Betbesé AJ, Páez J, Vecilla F, Canizares R, Padró J, et al. Non-invasive pressure support ventilation versus conventional oxygen therapy in acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a randomised trial. Lancet 2000; 356:2126-2132.
2. Mehta S, Jay GD, Woolard RH, Hipona RA, Connolly EM, Cimini DM, et al. Randomized, prospective trial of bilevel versus continuous positive airway pressure in acute pulmonary edema. Crit Care Med 1997; 25:620-628.
3. Bellone A, Monari A, Cortellaro F, Vettorello M, Arlati S, Coen D. Myocardial infarction in acute pulmonary edema: noninvasive pressure support ventilation versus continuous positive airway pressure. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:1860-1865.
4. Park M, Sangean MC, Volpe M de S, Feltrim MIZ, Nozawa E, Leite PF, et al. Randomized, prospective trial of oxygen, continuous positive airway pressure, and bilevel positive airway pressure by face mask in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:2407-2415.
5. Crane SD, Elliott MW, Gilligan P, Richarda K, Gray AJ. Randomised controlled comparison of continuous positive airway pressure, bilevel noninvasive ventilation, and standard treatment in emergency department patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. Emerg Med J 2004; 21:155-161.
6. Graff L, Orledge J, Radford MJ, Wang Y, Petrillo M, Maag R. Correlation of the Agency of Health Care Policy and Research congestive heart failure admission guideline with mortality: peer review organization voluntary hospital association initiative to decrease events (PROVIDE) for congestive heart failure. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 34:429-437.
7. Kosowsky JM, Stephanides SL, Branson RD, Sayre MR. Prehospital use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for presumed pulmonary edema: a preliminary case series. Prehosp Emerg Care 2001; 5:190-196.
8. Kallio T, Kuisma M, Alaspaa A, Rosenberg PH. The use of prehospital continuous positive airway pressure treatment in presumed acute severe pulmonary edema. Prehosp Emerg Care 2003; 7:209-213.
9. Sharon A, Shpirer I, Kaluski E, Moshkovitz Y, Milovanov O, Polak R, et al. High-dose intravenous isosorbide-dinitrate is safer and better than Bi-PAP ventilation combined with conventional treatment for severe pulmonary edema. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36:832-837.
10. Naughton MT, Rahmen MA, Hara K, Floras JS, Bradley TD. Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on intrathoracic and left ventricular transmural pressures in patients with congestive heart failure. Circulation 1995; 91:1725-1731.