Attention-related modulation of auditory brainstem responses during contralateral noise exposure

NeuroReport

Volumn 19, Issue 16, 2008, Pages 1593-1599

  Ikeda, Kazunari ^a   Sekiguchi, Takahiro ^a   Hayashi, Akiko ^a  

^a TOKYO GAKUGEI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Attention; Auditory brainstem response; Contralateral masking; Corticofugal system; White noise

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY RESPONSE; BRAIN STEM RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND PRESSURE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NOISE; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PITCH DISCRIMINATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 55349117811     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32831269be     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Hernández-Peón R, Scherrer H, Jouvet M. Modification of electric activity in cochlear nucleus during 'attention' in unanesthetized cats. Science 1956; 123:331-332.
2. Fritz JB, Elhilali M, David SV, Shamma SA. Auditory attention: focusing the searchlight on sound. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2007; 17:437-455.
3. Huffman RF, Henson OW Jr. The descending auditory pathway and acousticomotor systems: connections with the inferior colliculus. Brain Res Rev 1990; 15:295-323.
4. Suga N, Gao E, Zhang Y, Ma X, Olsen JF. The corticofugal system for hearing: recent progress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97:11807-11814
5. Meric C, Collet L. Visual attention and evoked otoacoustic emissions: a slight but real effect. Int J Psychophysiol 1992; 12:233-235.
6. Puel JL, Bonfils P, Pujol R. Selective attention modifies the active micromechanical properties of the cochlea. Brain Res 1988; 447:380-383.
7. Galbraith GC, Bhuta SM, Choate AK, Kitahara JM, Mullen TA. Brain stem frequency-following response to dichotic vowels during attention. Neuroreport 1998; 9:1889-1893.
8. Hoormann J, Falkenstein M, Hohnsbein J. Early attention effects in human auditory-evoked potentials. Psychophysiology 2000; 37:29-42.
9. Collet L, Duclaux R. Auditory brainstem evoked responses and attention: contribution to a controversial subject. Acta Otolaryngol 1986; 101:439-441.
10. Connolly JF, Aubry K, McGillivary N, Scott DW. Human brainstem auditory evoked potentials fail to provide evidence of efferent modulation of auditory input during attentional tasks. Psychophysiology 1989; 26:292-303.
11. Davis AE, Beagley HA. Acoustic brainstem responses for clinical use: the effect of attention. Clin Otolaryngol 1985; 10:311-314.
12. Gregory SD, Heath JA, Rosenberg ME. Does selective attention influence the brain-stem auditory evoked potential? Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1989; 73:557-560.
13. Picton TW, Hillyard SA. Human auditory evoked potentials II: effects of attention. Etectroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1974; 36:191-199.
14. Picton TW, Stapells DR, Campbell KB. Auditory evoked potentials from the human cochlea and brainstem. J Otolaryngol 1981; 10 (Suppl 9):1-41.
15. Levine RA. Binaural interaction in brainstem potentials of human subjects. Ann Neurol 1981; 9:384-393.
16. Hirschhorn TN, Michie PT. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPS) and selective attention revisited. Psychophysiology 1990; 27:495-512.
17. Lukas JH. The role of efferent inhibition in human auditory attention: an examination of the auditory brainstem potentials. Int J Neurosci 1981; 12:137-145.
18. Ikeda K, Hayashi A. Binaural interaction and auditory brainstem responses during an attention task. Int J Neurosd 2008; 118 (in press).
19. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971; 9:97-113.
20. Stapells DR, Gates P. Estimation of the pure-tone audiogram by the auditory brainstem response: a review. Audiol Neurootol 1997; 2:257-280.
21. Hattori H. A practical manual of masking in clinical audiology. 3rd ed. Tokyo: Nakayama-Shoten; 2005. (in Japanese)
22. Folsom RC, Owsley RM. N1 action potentials in humans: influence of simultaneous contralateral stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol 1987; 103: 262-265.
23. Liberman MC. Rapid assessment of sound-evoked olivocochlear feedback: suppression of compound action potentials by contralateral sound. Hear Res 1989; 38:47-56.
24. Näätänen R. Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum; 1992.
25. Woldorff MG, Hillyard SA. Modulation of early auditory processing during selective listening to rapidly presented tones. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 79:170-191.