Experimental study on the extraction and distribution of textual domain keywords

Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience

Volumn 20, Issue 16, 2008, Pages 1917-1932

  Luo, Xiangfeng ^a   Fang, Ning ^a   Xu, Weimin ^a   Yu, Sheng ^a   Yan, Kai ^a   Xiao, Huizhe ^a  

^a SHANGHAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Domain keywords; Knowledge acquisition; Knowledge grid; Semantic grid

Indexed keywords

EXTRACTION; INVERSE PROBLEMS; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; SEMANTICS;

DOCUMENT FREQUENCY; DOMAIN KEYWORDS; KNOWLEDGE GRIDS; OPTIMAL PARAMETER; PERSONALIZED SERVICE; SCIENTIFIC TEXTS; SEMANTIC GRID; TERM FREQUENCY-INVERSE DOCUMENT FREQUENCIES;

TEXT PROCESSING;

EID: 55349101282     PISSN: 15320626     EISSN: 15320634     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cpe.1309     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Zhuge H, Luo XF. Automatic generation of document semantics for the e-science Knowledge Grid. Journal of Systems and Software 2006; 79:969-983.
2. Zhuge H, Luo XF. Knowledge Map: Mathematic model and dynamic behaviors. Journal of Computer Science & Technology 2005; 20(3):289-295.
3. Zhuge H, Li YY. Learning with an active e-course in the Knowledge Grid environment. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 2006; 18(3):333-356.
4. Kaski S, Lagus K, Honkela K, Kohonen T. Statistical aspects of the WEBSOM system in organizing document collections. Computing Science and Statistics, vol. 29, Scott DW (ed.). Interface Foundation of North America, Inc.: Fairfax Station, VA, 1998; 281-290.
5. Salton G, Yang CS. On the specification of term values in automatic indexing. Journal of Documentation 1973; 29(4):351-372.
6. Dumais ST, Platt J, Heckerman D, Sahami M. Inductive learning algorithms and representations for text categorization. Proceedings of CIKM-9H, 7th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Bethesda, MD, 1998; 148-155.
7. Lam W, Low KF, Ho CY. Using a Bayesian network induction approach for text categorization. Proceedings of IJCAI-97, 15th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Nagoya, Japan, 1997; 745-750.
8. Fabrizio S. Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Computing Surveys 2002; 34(1):1-47.
9. Larkey LS. Automatic essay grading using text categorization techniques. Proceedings of SIGIR-98, the 21st ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Melbourne, Australia, 1998; 90-95.
10. Wiener ED, Pedersen JO, Weigend AS. A neural network approach to topic spotting. Proceedings of SDAIR-95, the 4th Annual. Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval, Las Vegas, NV, 1995; 317-332.
11. Caropreso MF, Matwin S, Sebastiani F. A learner-independent evaluation of the usefulness of statistical phrases for automated text categorization. Text Databases and Document Management: Theory and Practice, Chin AG (ed.). Idea Group Publishing: Hershey, PA, 2001; 78-102.
12. Ng HT, Goh WB, Low KL. Feature selection, perception learning, and a usability case study for text categorization. Proceedings of SIGIR-97, the 20th ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Philadelphia, PA, 1997; 67-73.
13. Christopher D, Hinrich S. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 2000.
14. Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI. Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research 2003; 3:993-1022.
15. Blei DM, Lafferty JD. Correlated topic model. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) 2006; 18:147-154.