A comparison of the dodgson method and the copeland rule

Economics Bulletin

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2003, Pages

  Klamler, Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21244466696     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15452921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Baigent, N. (1983): Some Reservation on Strictly Majoritarian Social Choice, Discussion Paper Series, University of Essex.
2. Copeland, A. H. (1951): A Reasonable Social Welfare Function, mimeo, University of Michigan.
3. Dodgson, C. (1876): A Method of Taking Votes on More Than Two Issues, in: Black, D. (1958): "The Theory of Committees and Elections", Cambridge University Press, London.
4. Fishburn, P. (1977): Condorcet Social Choice Functions, SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 33, 469-489.
5. Klamler, C. (2002a): The Dodgson Ranking and Its Relation to Kemeny's Method and the Slater Rule, mimeo, Graz University.
6. Klamler, C. (2002b): The Copeland Method and Distance Minimization, mimeo, Graz University.
7. Laffond, G. et al. (1995): Condorcet Choice Correspondences: A Set-theoretical Comparison, Mathematical Social Sciences, 30, 23-35.
8. Ratliff, T. C. (2001): A Comparison of Dodgson's Method and Kemeny's Rule, Social Choice and Welfare, 18, 79-90.
9. Ratliff, T. C. (2002a): A Comparison of Dodgson's Method and the Borda Count, Economic Theory, 20, 357-372.
10. Ratliff, T. C. (2002b): Some Startling Inconsistencies When Electing Committees, mimeo, Wheaton College, Massachusetts.
11. Saari, D. G. (1995): "Basic Geometry of Voting", Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
12. Saari, D. G. (2000): Mathematical Structure of Voting Paradoxes: I. Pairwise Votes, Economic Theory, 15, 1-53.