A computational model of text reuse in ancient literary texts

ACL 2007 - Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 472-479

  Lee, John ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; LITERARY TEXTS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS;

EID: 55249127441     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. R. Barzilay and N. Elhadad. 2003. Sentence Alignment for Monolingual Comparable Corpora. Proc. EMNLP.
2. M. E. Boismard. 1972. Synopse des quatre Evangiles en français, Tome II. Editions du Cerf, Paris, France.
3. F. Bovon. 2002. Luke I: A Commentary on the Gospel of Luke 1:1-9:50. Hermeneia. Fortress Press. Minneapolis, MN.
4. F. Bovon. 2003. The Lukan Story of the Passion of Jesus (Luke 22-23). Studies in Early Christianity. Baker Academic, Grand Rapids, MI.
5. H. J. Cadbury. 1920. The Style and Literary Method of Luke. Harvard Theological Studies, Number VI. George F. Moore and James H. Ropes and Kirsopp Lake (ed). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. P. Clough, R. Gaizauskas, S. S. L. Piao and Y. Wilks. 2002. METER: MEasuring TExt Reuse. Proc. ACL.
7. M. Collins. 2002. Discriminative Training Methods for Hidden Markov Models: Theory and Experiments with Perceptron Algorithms. Proc. EMNLP.
8. V. Hatzivassiloglou, J. L. Klavans and E. Eskin. 1999. Detecting Text Similarity over Short Passages: Exploring Linguistic Feature Combinations via Machine Learning. Proc. EMNLP.
9. W. C. Helmbold and E. N. O'Neil. 1959. Plutarch's Quotations. Philological Monographs XIX, American Philological Association.
10. A. M. Honoré. 1968. A Statistical Study of the Synoptic Problem. Novum Testamentum, Vol. 10, p.95-147.
11. J. Jeremias. 1966. The Eucharistic Words of Jesus. Scribner's, New York, NY.
12. M. Miyake, H. Akama, M. Sato, M. Nakagawa and N. Makoshi. 2004. Tele-Synopsis for Biblical Research: Development of NLP based Synoptic Software for Text Analysis as a Mediator of Educational Technology and Knowledge Discovery. Proc. IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT).
13. F. Mosteller and D. L.Wallace. 1964. Inference and Disputed Authorship: The Federalist. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.
14. F. Neirynck. 1973. La matière marcienne dans l'évangile de Luc. L' Évangile de Luc, Problèmes littéraires et théologiques. Editions Duculot, Belgium.
15. F. Rehkopf. 1959. Die lukanische Sonderquelle. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament, Vol. 5. Tübingen, Germany.
16. B. H. Streeter. 1930. The Four Gospels: A Study of Origins. MacMillan. London, England.
17. V. Taylor. 1972. The Passion Narrative of St. Luke: A Critical and Historical Investigation. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series, Vol. 19. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
18. O. Uzuner, B. Katz and T. Nahnsen. 2005. Using Syntactic Information to Identify Plagiarism. Proc. 2nd Workshop on Building Educational Applications using NLP. Ann Arbor, MI.
19. A. van den Hoek. 1996. Techniques of Quotation in Clement of Alexandria. A View of Ancient Literary Working Methods. Vigiliae Christianae, Vol 50, p.223-243. E. J. Brill, Leiden, The Netherlands.