Chapter 2 Fuzzy ontologies for information retrieval on the WWW

Capturing Intelligence

Volumn 1, Issue C, 2006, Pages 21-48

  Parry, David ^a  

^a AUCKLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

collaborative filtering; fuzzy set theory; information retrieval; ontology; semantic web

Indexed keywords

EID: 55249127386     PISSN: 15749576     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1574-9576(06)80004-3     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Akkermans H., et al. Value webs: using ontologies to bundle real-world services. Intelligent Systems, IEEE 19 4 (2004) 57-66
2. Altman D.G., and Andersen P.K. Calculating the number needed to treat for trials where the outcome is time to an event. BMJ 319 7223 (1999) 1492-1495
3. Bachmann L.M., et al. Identifying diagnostic studies in MEDLINE: reducing the number needed to read. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 9 6 (2002) 653-658
4. Baeza-Yates R., and Ribeiro-Neto B. Modern Information Retrieval (1999), ACM
5. Belew R.K. Finding Out About: A Cognitive Perspective on Search Engine Technology and the WWW (2000), Cambridge University Press, New York
6. (May). Berners-Lee T., Hendler J., and Lassila O. The semantic web. Scientific American (2001) 29-37
7. Bodenreider O. Circular hierarchical relationships in the UMLS: etiology, diagnosis, treatment, complications and prevention. AMIA Annual Symposium 2001 (2001), AMIA, Cambridge
8. Bordogna G., and Pasi G. Application of fuzzy set theory to extend Boolean information retrieval. In: Crestani F., and Pasi G. (Eds). Soft Computing in Information Retrieval: Techniques and Applications (2000), Physica-Verlag 21-47
9. Borgman C. Why are online catalogs hard to use? Lessons learned from information-retrieval studies. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 37 6 (1986) 387-400
10. Borgman C. Why are online catalogs still hard to use?. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 47 7 (1996) 493-503
11. Bosc P., Galibourg M., and Hamon G. Fuzzy querying with SQL: extensions and implementation aspects. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 28 3 (1988) 333-349
12. Brem S., and Boyes A. Using critical thinking to conduct effective searches of online resources. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 7 7 (2000)
13. Brewster C., et al. Knowledge representation with ontologies: the present and future, Intelligent Systems. IEEE 19 1 (2004) 72-81
14. Crampes M., and Ranwez S. Ontology-supported and ontology-driven conceptual navigation on the World Wide Web. Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM on Hypertext and Hypermedia (2000), ACM Press, Heidelberg 191-199
15. Crestani F., et al. "Is this document relevant ? ..Probably": a survey of probabilistic methods in information retrieval. ACM Computing Surveys 30 4 (1998) 528-552
16. Eastman C.M., and Jansen B.J. Coverage, relevance, and ranking: the impact of query operators on Web search engine results. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 21 4 (2003) 383-411
17. Ensing M., et al. An object-oriented approach to knowledge representation in a biomedical domain. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 6 (1994) 459-482
18. Gerwe P., and Viles C.L. User effort in query construction and interface selection. Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Digital libraries (2000), ACM Press, San Antonio, TX 246-247
19. Glover E., et al. Architecture of a metasearch engine that supports user information needs. Eighth International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM'99) (1999)
20. Glover E., et al. Web search - your way. Comm. ACM 44 12 (2001) 97-102
21. Gruber T. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5 2 (1993) 199-220
22. Guarino N. Semantic matching: formal ontological distinctions for information organization, extraction, and integration. International Summer School on Information Extraction: A Multidisciplinary Approach to an Emerging Information Technology (1997), Springer-Verlag, San Antonio, TX 139-170
23. Haynes R.B., and Wilczynski N.L. Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of diagnosis from Medline: analytical survey. BMJ 328 7447 (2004) 1040
24. Hertzberg S., and Rudner L. The quality of researchers' searches of the ERIC database. Education Policy Analysis Archives 7 25 (1999)
25. Jardine N., and van Rijsbergen C.J. The use of hierarchic clustering in information retrieval. Information Storage and Retrieval 7 (1971) 217-240
26. Kacprzyk J., and Zilkowski A. Database queries with fuzzy linguistic quantifiers. IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet. 16 3 (1986) 474-479
27. Kacprzyk J., and Bosc P. Fuzziness in Database Management Systems. Studies in Fuzziness (1995), Physica-Verlag
28. Kacprzyk J., and Zadrozny S. Internet as a challenge to fuzzy querying. Intelligent Exploration of the Web (2003), Physica-Verlag GmbH, Heidelberg 74-95
29. Kagolovsky Y., and Moehr J.R. Evaluation of information retrieval: old problems and new perspectives. 8th International Congress on Medical Librarianship. London (2000)
30. Kagolovsky Jr. Y.M. A new approach to the concept of "relevance" in information retrieval (IR). Medinfo 2001. London (2001)
31. P. Karp, V. Chaudhri, J. Thomere, XOL - ontology exchange language.
32. Kruschwitz U. An adaptable search system for collections of partially structured documents. Intelligent Systems, IEEE 18 4 (2003) 44-52
33. Li M., et al. The similarity metric. SODA - Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (2003), Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
34. Liu H., Lieberman H., and Selker T. GOOSE: a goal-oriented search engine with commonsense ontological user profiling in recommender systems. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems (2002)
35. Middleton S.E., Shadbolt N.R., and Roure D.C.D. Ontological user profiling in recommender systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 22 1 (2004) 54-88
36. Mihalcea R.F., and Mihalcea S.I. World semantics for information retrieval: moving one step closer to the Semantic Web. Tools with Artificial Intelligence, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference (2001), Southern Methodist Univ., Baltimore, MD
37. Musen M. Creating and using ontologies: what informatics is all about. Medinfo 2001. London (2001)
38. Musen M.A., et al. PROTEGE-II: computer support for development of intelligent systems from libraries of components. Medinfo 8 1 (1995) 766-770
39. National Institute of Standards and Technology. Text Retrieval Conference (2004)
40. National Library of Medicine. Unified Medical Language System (2000)
41. (March/April). Noy N., et al. Creating Semantic Web contents with Protégé-2000. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16 2 (2001) 60-71
42. Noy N.F., and McGuinness D. Ontology development 101: a guide to creating your first ontology (2001), Stanford University, Dallas, TX, Practical 25
43. Noy N.F., and Musen M.A. SMART: Automated Support for Ontology Merging and Alignment (1999), Stanford University
44. Page L., et al. The PageRank citation ranking: bringing order to the Web (1999), Stanford University 17
45. Parry D. A fuzzy ontology for medical document retrieval. In: Purvis M. (Ed). The Australasian Workshop on Data Mining and Web Intelligence (2004), Australian Computer Society 121-126
46. Parry D. Fuzzification of a standard ontology to encourage reuse. 2004 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IEEE IRI-2004). Las Vegas, USA (2004) 582-587
47. Pearl J. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference (1988), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., Dunedin
48. Sackett D., et al. Evidence Based Medicine - How to Practice and Teach EBM (1997), Churchill Livingstone
49. Salton G., and Lesk M.E. Computer evaluation of indexing and text processing. J. ACM 15 1 (1968) 8-36
50. Slomin D., and Tengi R. WordNet (2003), Princeton University Cognitive Science Lab.
51. W3C. Smith M.K., Welty C., and McGuinnes D.L. OWL Web ontology language guide (2004)
52. Spink A.J., Jansen B.J., Wolfram D., and Saracevic T. From e-sex to e-commerce: Web search changes. Computer 35 3 (2002) 107-109
53. Staab S., and Maedche A. Knowledge portals: ontologies at work. AI Magazine 22 (2001) 63-85
54. Stanford University Knowledge Systems Laboratory. Ontolingua ontology editor (2001), Stanford University
55. Swanson D.R. Historical note: information retrieval and the future of an illusion. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 39 (1988) 92-98
56. Fuzzy Systems, 2000. FUZZ IEEE 2000. Takagi T., et al. Data retrieval using conceptual fuzzy sets. The Ninth IEEE International Conference (2000), Dept. of Comput. Sci., Meiji Univ.
57. Taylor J.R. Linguistic Categorization. 3rd ed. (2003), Oxford University Press, Kanagawa, Japan, Practical
58. van Rijsbergen C.J. Information Retrieval. 2nd ed. (1979)
59. Widyantoro D.H., and Yen J. Using fuzzy ontology for query refinement in a personalized abstract search engine. IFSA World Congress and 20th NAFIPS International Conference, 2001. Joint 9th (2001)
60. Wilczynski N.L., and Haynes R.B. Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound prognostic studies in MEDLINE: an analytic survey. BMC Medicine 2 23 (2004)
61. Wolfram D., et al. Vox populi: the public searching of the web. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 52 12 (2001) 1073-1074
62. Wollersheim D., and Rahayu W. Methodology for creating a sample subset of dynamic taxonomy to use in navigating medical text databases. International Database Engineering and Applications Symposium, Proceedings (2002)
63. (2000). Zadeh L. Fuzzy sets. J. Inform. and Control 8 (1965) 338-353
64. Zadrozny S., and Kacprzyk J. FQUERY for access: towards human consistent querying user interface. Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (1996), ACM Press, Oxford 532-536