Using critical thinking to conduct effective searches of online resources

Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation

Volumn 7, Issue 7, 2001, Pages

  Brem, Sarah K ^a   Boyes, Andrea J ^b  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Jasper Creek Education Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893637367     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15317714     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. American Library Association (2000). LARC Fact Sheet No. 26: How many libraries are on the Internet? [Online] Available: http://www.ala.org/library/fact26.html
2. Brem, S. K. & Rips, L. J. (in press) Explanation and evidence in informal argument. Cognitive Science.
3. Butler, D., & Winne, P. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis Review of Educational Research, 65, 245-281.
4. Chi, M. T. H., deLeeuw, N., Chiu, M., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.
5. Harris, Robert (1997). Evaluating Internet research sources. [Online] Available: http://www.sccu.edu/faculty/R_Harris/evalu8it.htm
6. Hertzberg, S. & Rudner, L. (1999). The Quality of Researchers' Searches of the ERIC Database. Education Policy Analysis Archives. [Online] Available: http://olam.ed.asu.edu/epaa/v7n25.html
7. Kirk, E. E. (2000). Evaluating information found on the Internet. [Online] Available: http://milton.mse.jhu.edu:8001/research/education/net.html
8. Koehler, D. (1991). Explanation, imagination, and confidence in judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 499-519.
9. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Nelson, T. O. & Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The 'delayed-JOL effect.' Psychological Science, 2, 267-270.
11. Otero, J. & Kintsch, W. (1992). Failures to detect contradictions in a text: What readers believe versus what they read. Psychological Science, 3, 229-235.