A Hebbian learning rule mediates asymmetric plasticity in aligning sensory representations

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 100, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 1067-1079

  Witten, Ilana B ^a   Knudsen, Eric I ^a   Sompolinsky, Haim ^b,c  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; LEARNING; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY NERVE CELL; SENSORY STIMULATION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EFFERENT NERVE; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; SPECTROSCOPY; SYNAPSE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; EFFERENT PATHWAYS; LEARNING; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; NEURONS, AFFERENT; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS; SYNAPSES; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 55249119063     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00013.2008     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Atwal GS. Dynamic plasticity in coupled avian midbrain maps. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 70: 061904, 2004.
2. Bergan JF, Ro P, Ro D, Knudsen EI. Hunting increases adaptive auditory map plasticity in adult barn owls. J Neurosci 25: 9816-9820, 2005.
3. Bienenstock EL, Cooper LN, Munro PW. Theory for the development of neuron selectivity: orientation specificity and binocular interaction in visual cortex. J Neurosci 2: 32-48, 1982.
4. Brainard MS, Knudsen EI. Dynamics of visually guided auditory plasticity in the optic tectum of the barn owl. J Neurophysiol 73: 595-614, 1995.
5. Brainard MS, Knudsen EI. Sensitive periods for visual calibration of the auditory space map in the barn owl optic tectum. J Neurosci 18: 3929-3942, 1998.
6. Constantine-Paton M, Law MI. Eye-specific termination bands in tecta of three-eyed frogs. Science 202: 639-641, 1978.
7. DeBello WM, Knudsen EI. Multiple sites of adaptive plasticity in the owl's auditory localization pathway. J Neurosci 24: 6853-6861, 2004.
8. Desimone R, Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu Rev Neurosci 18: 193-222, 1995.
9. Engert F, Tao HW, Zhang LI, Poo MM. Moving visual stimuli rapidly induce direction sensitivity of developing tectal neurons. Nature 419: 470-475, 2002.
10. Gaillard F. Binocularly driven neurons in the rostral part of the frog optic tectum. J Comp Physiol A Sens Neural Behav Physiol 157: 47-55, 1985.
11. Gelfand JJ, Pearson JC, Spence CD, Sullivan WE. Multisensor integration in biological systems. In: IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, Arlington, VA. New York: IEEE Press, 1988, p. 147-153.
12. Gold JI, Knudsen EI. Hearing impairment induces frequency-specific adjustments in auditory spatial tuning in the optic tectum of young owls. J Neurophysiol 82: 2197-2209, 1999.
13. Hou Q, Zhang D, Jarzylo L, Huganir RL, Man HY. Homeostatic regulation of AMPA receptor expression at single hippocampal synapses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 775-780, 2008.
14. Hyde PS, Knudsen EI. A topographic instructive signal guides the adjustment of the auditory space map in the optic tectum. J Neurosci 21: 8586-8593, 2001.
15. Ibata K, Sun Q, Turrigiano GG. Rapid synaptic scaling induced by changes in postsynaptic firing. Neuron 57: 819-826, 2008.
16. Kardar M, Zee A. Information optimization in coupled audio-visual cortical maps. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 15894-15897, 2002.
17. Keating MJ, Beazley L, Feldman JD, Gaze RM. Binocular interaction and intertectal neuronal connexions: dependence upon developmental stage. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 191: 445-466, 1975.
18. Keating MJ, Grant S. The critical period for experience-dependent plasticity in a system of binocular visual connections in Xenopus laevis: its temporal profile and relation to normal developmental requirements. Eur J Neurosci 4: 27-36, 1992.
19. Knudsen EI. Auditory and visual maps of space in the optic tectum of the owl. J Neurosci 2: 1177-1194, 1982.
20. Knudsen EI. Instructed learning in the auditory localization pathway of the barn owl. Nature 417: 322-328, 2002.
21. Knudsen EI. Fundamental components of attention. Annu Rev Neurosci 30: 57-78, 2007.
22. Linkenhoker BA, Knudsen EI. Incremental training increases the plasticity of the auditory space map in adult barn owls. Nature 419: 293-296, 2002.
23. Miller GL, Knudsen EI. Adaptive plasticity in the auditory thalamus of juvenile barn owls. J Neurosci 23: 1059-1065, 2003.
24. Miller KD. Synaptic economics: competition and cooperation in synaptic plasticity. Neuron 17: 371-374, 1996.
25. Miller KD, MacKay DJC. The role of constraints in Hebbian learning. Neural Comput 6: 100-126, 1994.
26. Mysore SP, Quartz SR. Modeling structural plasticity in the barn owl auditory localization system with a spike-time dependent Hebbian learning rule. Proc IEEE Int Joint Conf Neural Networks 5: 2766 -2771, 2005.
27. Rabinowitch I, Segev I. The interplay between homeostatic synaptic plasticity and functional dendritic compartments. J Neurophysiol 96: 276-283, 2006.
28. Reh TA, Constantine-Paton M. Eye-specific segregation requires neural activity in three-eyed Rana pipiens. J Neurosci 5: 1132-1143, 1985.
29. Reynolds JH, Chelazzi L. Attentional modulation of visual processing. Annu Rev Neurosci 27: 611-647, 2004.
30. Rucci M, Tononi G, Edelman GM. Registration of neural maps through value-dependent learning: modeling the alignment of auditory and visual maps in the barn owl's optic tectum. J Neurosci 17: 334-352, 1997.
31. Udin SB, Fawcett JW. Formation of topographic maps. Annu Rev Neurosci 11: 289-327, 1988.
32. Udin SB, Grant S. Plasticity in the tectum of Xenopus laevis: binocular maps. Prog Neurobiol 59: 81-106, 1999.
33. Zhang LI, Tao HW, Holt CE, Harris WA, Poo M. A critical window for cooperation and competition among developing retinotectal synapses. Nature 395: 37-44, 1998.