Using many pilot points and singular value decomposition in groundwater model calibration

IAHS-AISH Publication

Volumn , Issue 320, 2008, Pages 235-239

  Christensen, Steen ^a   Doherty, John ^b  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b Watermark Numerical Computing   (Australia)

Author keywords

Parameter estimation; Pilot point; Singular value decomposition

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; FISCHER-TROPSCH SYNTHESIS; GROUNDWATER; HYDROGEOLOGY; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; RELIABILITY; UNDERGROUND RESERVOIRS;

BASIC IDEAS; EIGEN VECTORS; GROUNDWATER MODELS; MODEL PARAMETERIZATION; NON-LINEAR REGRESSIONS; NORMAL MATRIXES; PILOT POINT; PRACTICAL PROBLEMS; SINGULAR VALUES;

SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION;

CALIBRATION; CONFERENCE PROCEEDING; DECOMPOSITION; EIGENVALUE; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; PARAMETERIZATION; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 55249116512     PISSN: 01447815     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Cooley, R. L. & Christensen, S. (2006) Bias and uncertainty in regression-calibrated models of groundwater flow in heterogeneous media. Adv. Water Resour. 29(5), 639-656.
2. De Marsily, G. (1978) De l'identification des systèmes hydrogéologiques. Thèse d'Etat, Université Paris VI, France.
3. De Marsily, G. (1984) Spatial variability of properties in porous media: a stochastic approach. In: Fundamentals of Transport Phenomena in Porous Media (ed. by J. Bear & M. Y. Corapcioglu), 719-769. NATO ASI Series E, 82. Martinus Nijhof Publishers, Boston, USA.
4. De Marsily, G., Lavedan, G., Boucher, M. & Fasanino, G. (1984) Interpretation of interference tests in a well field using geostatistical techniques to fit the permeability distribution in a reservoir model. In: Geostatistics for Natural Resources Characterization, Part 2 (ed. by G. Verly, M. David, A. G. Journel & A. Marechal), 831-849. NATO ASI Series C. 122, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Boston, USA.
5. Doherty, J. (2007) PEST User Manual, 5th edn. Watermark Numerical Computing, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
6. Gómez-Hernández, J. J., Sahuquillo, A. & Capilla, J. E. (1997) Stocahstic simulation of transmissivity fields conditional to both transmissivity and piezometric data - I. Theory. J. Hydrol. 203, 162-174.
7. Harbaugh, A. W., Banta, E. R., Hill, M. C. & McDonald, M. C. (2000) MODFLOW-2000, The US Geological Survey modular ground-water model - user guide to modularization concepts and the ground-water flow process. US Geol. Survey, Open-File Report 00-92, Reston, Virginia, USA.
8. Lavenue, A. M. & Pickens, J. F. (1992) Application of a coupled adjoint sensitivity and kriging approach to calibrate a groundwater flow mode. Water Resour. Res. 28(6), 1543-1569.
9. Moore, C. & Doherty, J. (2005) Role of the calibration process in reducing model predictive error. Water Resour. Res. 41(5), Art. No. W05020 MAY 24 2005.