Scientific responsibility for the dissemination and interpretation of genetic research: Lessons from the "warrior gene" controversy

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 507-509

  Wensley, D ^a   King, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINE OXIDASE (FLAVIN CONTAINING);

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR GENETICS; ETHICS; ETHNOLOGY; GENETICS; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; NEW ZEALAND; POLYNESIA; RESEARCH ETHICS; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

ETHICS, RESEARCH; GENETICS, BEHAVIORAL; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MONOAMINE OXIDASE; NEW ZEALAND; POLYNESIA; PREJUDICE;

EID: 55249115624     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: 14734257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2006.019596     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Lea R, Chambers G. Monoamine oxidase, addiction, and the "warrior" gene hypothesis. NZMJ 2007;120:5-10.
2. th International Congress of Human Genetics, Brisbane, Australia: August 2006.
3. A helpful review of the evidence is outlined in Kreek MJ, Nielsen DA, Butelman ER, et al, eds. Genetic influences on impulsivity, risk taking, stress responsivity and vulnerability to drug abuse and addiction. Nature Neurosci 2005;8:1450-7.
4. Warrior gene prevalent in Māori study. One News, 9 August 2006. http://tvnz.co.nz/view/page/425826/810285 (accessed 12 Mar 2008).
5. Maori 'warrior' gene linked to aggression. The New Zealand Herald, 9 August 2006. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/category/story.cfm?c_id= 204&objectid=10395334 (accessed 12 Mar 2008).
6. Hokowhitu B. Genetic disposition ideas racist quasi-science. The Otago Daily Times [Opinion] 14 August 2006.
7. See discussions in Tauber A I. Is biology a political science? BioScience 1999;49:479-86
8. See discussions in Verhoog H. The responsibilities of scientists. Minerva 1981;19:582-604.
9. Schweber SS. In the shadow of the bomb: Oppenheimer, Bethe, and the moral responsibility of the scientist. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2000.
10. Gibbons M. Science's new social contract with society. Nature 1999;402:C81-4.
11. Council for Science and Technology. Rigour, respect and responsibility: a universal code for scientists. 2005.
12. For examples of how scientists have eroded the 'internal/ external'distinction see discussion in Beckwith J. A historical view of social responsibility in genetics. Bioscience 1993;43:327-33.
13. American Society of Human Genetics. Code of Ethics. 2006. See discussion Boughman J. ASHG Code of Ethics. Am J Hum Genet 2006;79:1136-7.
14. See discussion in Sherman S, DeFries J, Gottesman I, et al, eds. Behavioural Genetics' 97: ASHG Statement. Am J Hum Genet 1997;60:1265-75.
15. See Morgan D. Legal control. In Marteau T, Richards M, eds. The troubled helix: social and psychological implications of the new human genetics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996:189.
16. Furr LA. Perceptions of genetics as harmful to society: differences among samples of African Americans and European Americans. Genetic Test 2002;6:25-30.
17. A helpful discussion of the complex interaction examined in: Lorenz J, Long J, Linnoila M, et al, eds. Genetic and other contributions to alcohol intake in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2006;30:389-98.
18. Curran G, Raskin H, Hansell S. Predicting problem drinking: a test of an interactive social learning model. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1997;21:1379-90.
19. Buck P. Medicine amongst the Māoris in ancient and modern times. MD Thesis, New Zealand: University of Otago, 1908:18-19 Cited in Human Genome Research Project. Choosing genes for future children: regulating preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Dunedin, New Zealand: Human Genome Research Project, 2006:98.
20. Ministry for Social Development and Employment. The social report 2006: indicators of social wellbeing in New Zealand. http://www.socialreport.msd.govt.nz/documents/social-report-2006.pdf (accessed 13 Mar 2008).
21. Waldergrave C, Stephens R, King P. Assessing the progress of poverty reduction. Soc Policy J New Zeal 2003;20:197-222, 200.
22. Weijer C, Goldsand G, Emanuel E. Protecting communities in research: current guidelines and limits of extrapolation. Nat Genet 1999;23:275-80.
23. Sims J, Kuhnlein HV. Indigenous peoples and participatory health research: planning and management/preparing research agreements. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2003. A report prepared by the Centre for Indigenous Peoples' Nutrition and Environment (CINE) and World Health Organization 2003 World Health Organization Geneva, Switzerland.
24. Juengst E. Groups as gatekeepers to genomic research: conceptually confusing, morally hazardous, and practically useless. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 1998;8:183-200.