Evaluation of a computer-assisted photograph-matching system to monitor naturally marked harbor seals at Tugidak Island, Alaska

Journal of Mammalogy

Volumn 89, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1201-1211

  Hastings, Kelly K ^a   Hiby, Lex A ^b   Small, Robert J ^a  

^a ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME   (United States)

^b Conservation Research Ltd ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Harbor seal; Mark recapture; Misidentification; Natural markings; Phoca vitulina; Photographic identification; Survival estimates

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; MARK-RECAPTURE METHOD; PELAGE; PHOTOGRAPH; PINNIPED; POPULATION ESTIMATION; SURVIVAL;

ALASKA; NORTH AMERICA; TRINITY ISLANDS; TUGIDAK ISLAND; UNITED STATES;

PHOCA; PHOCA VITULINA; PHOCA VITULINA RICHARDII;

EID: 55249094373     PISSN: 00222372     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1644/07-MAMM-A-151.1     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. ARZOUMANIAN, Z., J. HOLMBERG, AND B. NORMAN. 2005. An astronomical pattern-matching algorithm for computer-aided identification of whale sharks Rhincodon typus. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:999-1011.
2. BECK, C. A., AND J. P. REID. 1995. An automated photo-identification catalog for studies of the life history of the Florida manatee. Pp. 120-134 in Population biology of the Florida manatee (T. J. O'Shea, B. B. Ackerman, and H. F. Percival, eds.). United States Department of the Interior, National Biological Service, Information and Technology Report 1:1-289.
3. CAIAFA, C. F., A. N. PROTO, D. VERGANI, AND Z. STANGANELLI. 2005. Development of individual recognition of female southern elephant seals, Mirounga leonina, from Punta Norte Península Valdés, applying principal components analysis. Journal of Biogeography 32:1257-1266.
4. CARLSON, C. A., C. A. MAYO, AND H. WHITEHEAD. 1990. Changes in the ventral fluke pattern of the humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae), and its effect on matching: Evaluation of its significance to photo-identification research. Report of the International Whaling Commission Special Issue 12:105-111.
5. CREEL, S., ET AL. 2003. Population size estimation in Yellowstone wolves with error-prone noninvasive microsatellite genotypes. Molecular Ecology 12:2003-2009.
6. CROWLEY, S. M., B. P. KELLY, AND R. DANIEL. 2001. Individual identification of harbor seals for application to population and behavioral studies. Pp. 161-168 in Harbor seal investigations in Alaska, 2001 annual report. Division of Wildlife Conservation, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Anchorage.
7. FORCADA, J., AND A. AGUILAR. 2000. Use of photographic identification in capture-recapture studies of Mediterranean monk seals. Marine Mammal Science 16:767-793.
8. FORCADA, J., AND S. L. ROBINSON. 2006. Population abundance, structure and turnover estimates for leopard seals during winter dispersal combining tagging and photo-identification data. Polar Biology 29:1052-1062.
9. FRIDAY, N., T. D. SMITH, P. T. STEVICK, AND J. ALLEN. 2000. Measurement of photographic quality and individual distinctiveness for the photographic identification of humpback whales, Megaptera novaeangliae. Marine Mammal Science 16:355-374.
10. GANNON, W. L., R. S. SIKES, AND THE ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MAMMALOGISTS. 2007. Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research. Journal of Mammalogy 88:809-823.
11. GARRIGUE, C., R. DODEMONT, D. STEEL, AND C. S. BAKER. 2004. Organismal and 'gametic' capture-recapture using microsatellite genotyping confirm low abundance and reproductive autonomy of humpback whales on the wintering grounds of New Caledonia. Marine Ecology Progress Series 274:251-262.
12. GOWANS, S., AND H. WHITEHEAD. 2001. Photographic identification of northern bottlenose whales (Hyperoodon ampullatus): sources of heterogeneity from natural marks. Marine Mammal Science 17:76-93.
13. GUNNLAUGSSON, T., AND J. SIGURJÓNSSON. 1990. A note on the problem of false positives in the use of natural marking data for abundance estimation. Report of the International Whaling Commission Special Issue 12:143-145.
14. HAMMOND, P. S., S. A. MIZROCH, AND G. P. DONOVAN (EDS.). 1990. Individual recognition of cetaceans: use of photo-identification and other techniques to estimate population parameters. Report of the International Whaling Commission Special Issue 12:1-440.
15. HEILBRUN, R. D., N. J. SILVY, M. E. TEWES, AND M. J. PETERSON. 2003. Using automatically triggered cameras to individually identify bobcats. Wildlife Society Bulletin 31:748-755.
16. HIBY, L., AND P. LOVELL. 1990. Computer aided matching of natural markings: a prototype system for grey seals. Report of the International Whaling Commission Special Issue 12:57-61.
17. HIBY, L., AND P. LOVELL. 2001. A note on an automated system for matching the callosity patterns on aerial photographs of southern right whales. Journal of Cetacean Research and Management Special Issue 2:291-295.
18. JEMISON, L. A., G. W. PENDLETON, C. A. WILSON, AND R. J. SMALL. 2006. Long-term trends in harbor seal numbers at Tugidak Island and Nanvak Bay, Alaska. Marine Mammal Science 22:339-360.
19. JHALA, Y. V., Q. QURESHI, V. BHUVA, AND L. N. SHARMA. 1999. Population estimation of Asiatic lions. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 96:3-15.
20. KARANTH, K. U., AND J. D. NICHOLS. 1998. Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology 79:2852-2862.
21. KARLSSON, O., L. HIBY, T. LUNDBERG, M. JÜSSI, I. JÜSSI, AND B. HELANDER. 2005. Photo-identification, site fidelity, and movement of female gray seals (Halichoerus grypus) between haul-outs in the Baltic Sea. Ambio 34:628-634.
22. KELLY, B. P. 1981. Pelage polymorphism in Pacific harbor seals. Canadian Journal of Zoology 59:1212-1219.
23. KELLY, M. J. 2001. Computer-aided photograph matching in studies using individual identification: an example from Serengeti cheetahs. Journal of Mammalogy 82:440-449.
24. LANGTIMM, C. A., ET AL. 2004. Survival estimates for Florida manatees from the photo-identification of individuals. Marine Mammal Science 20:438-463.
25. LUKACS, P. M., AND K. P. BURNHAM. 2005a. Review of capture-recapture methods applicable to noninvasive genetic sampling. Molecular Ecology 14:3909-3919.
26. LUKACS, P. M., AND K. P. BURNHAM. 2005b. Estimating population size from DNA-based closed capture-recapture data incorporating genotyping error. Journal of Wildlife Management 69:396-403.
27. MACKEY, B. L. 2004. Population dynamics and life history of harbor seals: the determination of phocid vital rates using dental annuli and mark recapture. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland.
28. MCCONKEY, S. D. 1999. Photographic identification of the New Zealand sea lion: a new technique. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 33:63-66.
29. MILETTE, L. L., AND A. W. TRITES. 2003. Maternal attendance patterns of Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) from stable and declining populations in Alaska. Canadian Journal of Zoology 81:340-348.
30. MILLS, L. S., J. J. CITTA, K. P. LAIR, M. K. SCHWARTZ, AND D. A. TALLMON. 2000. Estimating animal abundance using noninvasive DNA sampling: promise and pitfalls. Ecological Applications 10:283-294.
31. NICHOLS, J. D., J. R. SAUER, K. H. POLLOCK, AND J. B. HESTBECK. 1992. Estimating transition probabilities for stage-based population projection matrices using capture-recapture data. Ecology 73:306-312.
32. OLESIUK, P. F., G. HORONOWITSCH, G. M. ELLIS, T. G. SMITH, L. FLOSTRAND, AND S. C. WARBY. 1996. An assessment of harbour seal (Phoca vitulina) predation on outmigrating chum fry (Oncorhynchus keta) and coho smolts (O. kisutch) in the lower Puntledge River, British Columbia. Pacific Stock Assessment Review Committee Working Paper S95-10:1-114.
33. PAYNE, R., O. BRAZIER, E. M. DORSEY, J. S. PERKINS, V. J. ROWNTREE, AND A. TITUS. 1983. External features in southern right whales (Eubalaena australis) and their use in identifying individuals. Pp. 371-445 in Communication and behavior of whales (R. Payne, ed.). AAAS Selected Symposium 76. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.
34. PITCHER, K. W. 1990. Major decline in number of harbor seals, Phoca vitulina richardsi, on Tugidak Island, Gulf of Alaska. Marine Mammal Science 6:121-134.
35. SEBER, G. A. F. 1982. The estimation of animal abundance and related parameters. 2nd ed. MacMillan, New York.
36. SHARMA, S., Y. JHALA, AND V. B. SAWARKAR. 2005. Identification of individual tigers (Panthera tigris) from their pugmarks. Journal of Zoology (London) 267:9-18.
37. STEVICK, P. T., P. J. PALSBØLL, T. D. SMITH, M. V. BRAVINGTON, AND P. S. HAMMOND. 2001. Errors in identification using natural markings: rates, sources, and effects on capture-recapture estimates of abundance. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58:1861-1870.
38. STUTZ, S. S. 1967. Pelage patterns and population distributions in the Pacific harbour seal (Phoca vitulina richardi). Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 24:451455.
39. TABERLET, P., L. P. WAITS, AND G. LUIKART. 1999. Noninvasive genetic sampling: look before you leap. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14:323-327.
40. VINCENT, C., L. MEYNIER, AND V. RIDOUX. 2001. Photo-identification in grey seals: legibility and stability of natural markings. Mammalia 65:363-372.
41. WAITS, J. L., AND P. L. LEBERG. 2000. Biases associated with population estimation using molecular tagging. Animal Conservation 3:191-199.
42. WHITE, G. C, AND K. P. BURNHAM. 1999. Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46 supplement:120-138.
43. YOCHEM, P. K., B. S. STEWART, M. MINA, A. ZORIN, V. SADOVOV, AND A. YABLOKOV. 1990. Non-metrical analyses of pelage patterns in demographic studies of harbor seals. Report of the International Whaling Commission Special Issue 12:87-90.