Automated 11C-PiB Standardized Uptake Value Ratio

Academic Radiology

Volumn 15, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 1376-1389

  Raniga, Parnesh ^a,b   Bourgeat, Pierrick ^a   Fripp, Jurgen ^a   Acosta, Oscar ^a   Villemagne, Victor L ^d,e   Rowe, Christopher ^d   Masters, Colin L ^e   Jones, Gareth ^d   O'Keefe, Graeme ^d   Salvado, Olivier ^a   Ourselin, Sébastien ^a,c  

^a ROYAL BRISBANE AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d Centre for PET   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

11C PiB; Alzheimer's disease; expectation; maximization; PET; segmentation; SUVR

Indexed keywords

N METHYL (11C) 2 (40 METHYLAMINOPHENYL) 6 HYDROXYBENZOTHIASOLE; TRACER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ALZHEIMER DISEASE; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; ALZHEIMER DISEASE; ANILINE COMPOUNDS; AUSTRALIA; BRAIN; CARBON RADIOISOTOPES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; ROC CURVE; THIAZOLES;

EID: 55149125943     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Klunk W.E., Engler H., Nordberg A., et al. Imaging brain amyloid in Alzheimer's disease with Pittsburgh Compound-B. Ann Neurol 55 (2004) 306-319
2. Agdeppa E.D., Kepe V., Liu J., et al. Binding characteristics of radiofluorinated 6-dialkylamino-2-naphthylethylidene derivatives as positron emission tomography imaging probes for beta-amyloid plaques in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci 21 (2001) 1-5
3. Verhoeff N.P., Wilson A.A., Takeshita S., et al. In-vivo imaging of Alzheimer disease beta-amyloid with [11C]SB-13 PET. Am J Geriat Psychiatry 12 (2004) 584-595
4. Rowe C.C., Ackerman U., Browne W., et al. Imaging of amyloid β in Alzheimer's disease with 18F-BAY94-9172, a novel PET tracer: proof of mechanism. Lancet Neurol 7 (2008) 129-135
5. Price J.C., Klunk W.E., Lopresti J., et al. Kinetic modeling of amyloid binding in humans using PET imaging and Pittsburgh Compound-B. B. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 25 (2005) 1528-1547
6. Jons P.H., Ernst M., Hankerson J., et al. Follow-up of radial arterial catheterization for positron emission tomography studies. Hum Brain Mapp 5 (1997) 119-123
7. Logan J., Fowler J.S., Volkow N.D., et al. Graphical analysis of reversible radioligand binding from time-activity measurements applied to [N-11C-methyl]-(-)-cocaine PET studies in human subjects. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 10 (1990) 740-747
8. Logan J., Fowler J.S., Volkow N.D., et al. Distribution volume ratios without blood sampling from graphical analysis of PET data. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 16 (1996) 834-840
9. Lopresti B.J., Klunk W.E., Mathis C.A., et al. Simplified quantification of Pittsburgh compound B amyloid imaging PET studies: a comparative analysis. J Nucl Med 46 (2005) 1959-1972
10. Joachim C., Morris J., and Selkoe D. Diffuse senile plaques occur commonly in the cerebellum in Alzheimer's disease. Am J Pathol 135 (1989) 309-319
11. Rowe C.C., Ng S., Ackermann U., et al. Imaging beta-amyloid burden in aging and dementia. Neurology 68 (2007) 1718-1725
12. Lockhart A., Lamb J., Osredkar T., et al. PIB is a non-specific imaging marker of amyloid-beta (Abeta) peptide-related cerebral amyloidosis. Brain 130 (2007) 2607-2615
13. Edison P., Archer H.A., Hinz R., et al. Amyloid, hypometabolism, and cognition in Alzheimer disease: an [11C]PIB and [18F]FDG PET study. Neurology 68 (2007) 501-508
14. Fagan A.M., Mintun M.A., Mach R.H., et al. Inverse relation between in vivo amyloid imaging load and cerebrospinal fluid Abeta42 in humans. Ann Neurol 59 (2006) 512-519
15. Kemppainen N.M., Aalto S., Wilson I.A., et al. PET amyloid ligand [11C]PIB uptake is increased in mild cognitive impairment. Neurology 68 (2007) 1603-1606
16. Yasuno F., Hasnine A.H., Suhara T., et al. Template-based method for multiple volumes of interest of human brain PET images. NeuroImage 16 (2002) 577-586
17. Mykkänen J., Tohka J., Luoma J., et al. Automatic extraction of brain surface and mid-sagittal plane from PET images applying deformable models. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 79 (2005) 1-17
18. Tohka J. Surface extraction from volumetric images using deformable meshes: a comparative study (2002) 350-364 In: European Conference on Computer Vision-ECCV 2002. Copenhagen, Denmark May 28-31, 2002.
19. Chen J.L., Gunn S.R., Nixon M.S., et al. Markov random field models for segmentation of PET images (2001) 468-474 In: Information processing in Medical Imaging, 17th International Conference, IPMI. Davis, CA, June 18-22, 2001.
20. Wong D.P., Feng D., Meikle S.R., et al. Segmentation of dynamic PET images using cluster analysis. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 49 (2002) 200-207
21. Brankov J.G., Galatsanos N.P., Yang Y., et al. Segmentation of dynamic PET or fMRI images based on a similarity metric. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 50 (2003) 1410-1414
22. Koivistoinen H., Tohka J., and Ruotsalainen U. Comparison of pattern classification methods in segmentation of dynamic PET brain images. 6th Nordic Signal Processing Symposium, IEEE (2004) 73-76
23. Browne J., and de Pierro A. A row-action alternative to the EM algorithm for maximizing likelihood in emission tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 15 (1996) 687-699
24. Folstein M.F., Folstein S.E., and McHugh P.R. Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12 (1975) 189-198
25. Morris J.C. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology 43 (1993) 2412-2414
26. Raniga P., Bourgeat P., Villemagne V., et al. Spline based inhomogeneity correction for [11]C-PIB PET segmentation using expectation maximization. In: Ayache N., Ourselin S., and Maeder A. (Eds). Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention-MICCAI 2007 LNCS 4791 (2007), Springer, Berlin, Germany 228-235
27. Aston J.A.D., Cunningham V.J., Asselin M.C., et al. Positron emission tomography partial volume correction: estimation and algorithms. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 22 (2002) 1019-1034
28. Lamare F., Turzo A., Bizais Y., et al. Validation of a Monte Carlo simulation of the Philips Allegro/GEMINI PET systems using GATE. Phys Med Biol 51 (2006) 943-962
29. Dempster A.P., Laird N.M., and Rubin D.B. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J Roy Stat Soc 39 (1977) 1-38
30. Mazziotta J., Toga A., Evans A., et al. A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM). Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 356 (2001) 1293-1322
31. Ourselin S., Roche A., Subsol G., et al. Reconstructing a 3D structure from serial histological sections. Image Vision Computing 19 (2001) 25-31
32. Kang Y., Engelke K., and Kalender W.A. Interactive 3D editing tools for image segmentation. Med Image Anal 8 (2004) 35-46
33. Ibanez L., Schroeder W., Ng L., et al. The ITK Software Guide, Kitware, Inc. http://www.itk.org/ItkSoftwareGuide.pdf 2nd ed, 2005. Accessed December 15, 2007.
34. Van Leemput K., Maes F., Vandermeulen D., et al. Automated model-based tissue classification of MR images of the brain. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18 (1999) 897-908
35. Dice L. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26 (1945) 297-302
36. Kim J., Cai W., Feng D., et al. Segmentation of VOI from multidimensional dynamic PET images by integrating spatial and temporal features. IEEE Trans Info Technol Biomed 10 (2006) 637-646
37. Tzourio-Mazoyer N., Landeau B., Papathanassiou D., et al. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. NeuroImage 15 (2002) 273-289
38. Development Core Team, R:a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org Accessed January 4, 2008.
39. Metz C.E., Herman B.A., and Roe C.A. Statistical comparison of two ROC-curve estimates obtained from partially-paired datasets. Med Decis Making 18 (1998) 110-121
40. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. (1988), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
41. Rosnow R.L., and Rosenthal R. Computing contrasts, effect sizes, and counternulls on other people's published data: general procedures for research consumers. Psychol Meth 1 (1996) 331-340