Spline based inhomogeneity correction for11C-PIB PET segmentation using expectation maximization

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4791 LNCS, Issue PART 1, 2007, Pages 228-235

  Raniga, Parnesh ^a,c   Bourgeat, Pierrick ^a   Villemagne, Victor ^b   O'Keefe, Graeme ^b   Rowe, Christopher ^b   Ourselin, Sébastien ^a  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b AUSTIN HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATES;

EXPECTATION MAXIMIZATION; POLYNOMIAL CORRECTION;

BIOMARKERS;

2 (4' (METHYLAMINO)PHENYL) 6 HYDROXYBENZOTHIAZOLE; 2-(4'-(METHYLAMINO)PHENYL)-6-HYDROXYBENZOTHIAZOLE; ANILINE DERIVATIVE; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT; THIAZOLE DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AGED; ALGORITHM; ALZHEIMER DISEASE; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; BRAIN; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MALE; METHODOLOGY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCINTISCANNING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; VALIDATION STUDY;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; ALZHEIMER DISEASE; ANILINE COMPOUNDS; ARTIFACTS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BRAIN; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THIAZOLES;

EID: 38149133733     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-75757-3_28     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Klunk, W.E., Engler, H., et al.: Imaging brain amyloid in Alzheimer's disease with Pittsburgh compound-B. Ann. Neurol. 55(3), 306-319 (2004)
2. Raniga, P., Bourgeat, P., et al.: PIB-PET segmentation for automatic SUVR normalization without MR information. In: ISBI, pp. 348-351. IEEE, Washington DC (2007)
3. Wong, K.P., Feng, D., et al.: Segmentation of dynamic PET images using cluster analysis. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 49, 200-207 (2002)
4. Brankov, J.G., Galatsanos, N.P., et al.: Segmentation of dynamic PET or fMRI images based on a similarity metric. IEEE Trans. Nucl Sci. 50, 1410-1414 (2003)
5. Chen, J.L., Gunn, S.R. et al.: Markov random field models for segmentation of PET images. In: IPMI, Davis, CA, USA, June 18-22, 2001 pp. 468-474 (2001)
6. Mykkänen, J., Tohka, J., et al.: Automatic extraction of brain surface and midsagittal plane from PET images applying deformable models. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 79(1), 1-17 (2005)
7. Tohka, J.: Surface extraction from volumetric images using deformable meshes: A comparative study. In: ECCV, pp. 350-364 (2002)
8. Van Leemput, K., Maes, F., et al.: Automated model-based tissue classification of MR images of the brain. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 18(10), 897-908 (1999)
9. Dawant, B.M., Zijdenbos, A.P., Margolin, R.A.: Correction of intensity variations in MR images for computer-aided tissue classification. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 12, 770-781 (1993)
10. Dice, L.: Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26, 297-302 (1945)
11. Kim, J., Cai, W., Feng, D., Eberl, S.: Segmentation of VOI from multidimensional dynamic PET images by integrating spatial and temporal features. IEEE Trans Inf. Technol. Biomed. 10, 637-646 (2006)
12. Ourselin, S., Roche, A., et al.: Reconstructing a 3D structure from serial histological sections. IVC 19, 25-31 (2001)