Determination of bone quality of 372 implant recipient sites using hounsfield unit from computerized tomography: A clinical study

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 238-244

  Turkyilmaz, Ilser ^a   Ozan, Oguz ^b   Yilmaz, Burak ^c   Ersoy, Ahmet Ersan ^c  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NEAR EAST UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Bone density; Computerized tomography; CT; Hounsfield value; Implant; Surgical stent

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BONE DENSITY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EDENTULOUSNESS; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RADIOGRAPHY; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ADULT; AGED; BONE DENSITY; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, ANATOMIC; PREOPERATIVE CARE; SOFTWARE; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED;

EID: 55149125597     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00085.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Turkyilmaz I, Sennerby L, Tumer C, Yenigul M, Avci M. Stability and marginal bone level measurements of unsplinted implants used for mandibular overdentures. A one-year randomized prospective clinical study comparing early and conventional loading protocols. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006 17 : 501 505.
2. Maló P, Nobre MA, Rangert B. Short implants placed one-stage in maxillae and mandibles: a retrospective clinical study with 1 to 9 years of follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2007 9 : 15 21.
3. Ostman PO, Hellman M, Sennerby L. Direct implant loading in the edentulous maxilla using a bone density-adapted surgical protocol and primary implant stability criteria for inclusion. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005 7 : 60 69.
4. Turkyilmaz I, Tözüm TF, Tumer C, Ozbek EN. A 2-year clinical report of patients treated with two loading protocols for mandibular overdentures: early versus conventional loading. J Periodontol 2006 33 : 1998 2004.
5. Maló P, Rangert B, Nobre M. All-on-Four" immediate-function concept with Brånemark System® implants for completely edentulous mandibles: a retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003 5 : 2 9.
6. Jemt T, Lekholm U. Implant treatment in edentulous maxilla: a five-year follow-up report on patients with different degrees of jaw resorption. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995 10 : 303 311.
7. Kaptein MCA, De Lange GL, Blijdorp PA. Peri-implant tissue health in reconstructed atrophic maxillae - report of 88 patients and 470 implants. J Oral Rehabil 1999 26 : 464 474.
8. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In : Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, eds. Tissue integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago, IL : Quintessence, 1985 : 199 209.
9. Misch CE. Density of bone: effect on surgical approach, and healing. In : Misch CE, ed. Contemporary implant dentistry. St. Louis, MO : Mosby, 1999 : 371 384.
10. Trisi P, Rao W. Bone classification clinical-histomorphometric comparison. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999 10 : 1 7.
11. Engquist B, Bergendal T, Kallis T, Linden U. A retrospective multicenter evaluation of ossointegrated implant supporting overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988 3 : 129 134.
12. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Roos J, Johansson P, Strid CG, Lekholm U. Evaluation of bone density using cutting resistance measurements and microradiography: an in vitro study in pig ribs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995 6 : 164 171.
13. Schwarz MS, Rothman SLG, Rhodes ML, Chafetz N. Computed tomography: part I. Preoperative assessment of the mandible for endosseous implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987 2 : 137 141.
14. Schwarz MS, Rothman SLG, Rhodes ML, Chafetz N. Computed tomography: part II. Preoperative assessment of the maxilla for endosseous implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987 2 : 143 148.
15. Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Early failures in 4641 consecutively placed Branemark dental implants: a study from stage I surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991 6 : 142 146.
16. Johansson P, Strid KG. Assessment of bone quality from placement resistance during implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994 9 : 279 288.
17. Lachmann S, Laval JY, Jager B, et al. Resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Part 2: peri-implant bone loss follow-up. An in vitro study with the periotest and Osstell instruments. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006 17 : 80 84.
18. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Meredith N, Lekholm U. A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency measurements of maxillary implants. A 20-month clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999 28 : 297 303.
19. Turkyilmaz I, Tözüm TF, Tumer C, Ozbek EN. Assessment of correlation between computerized tomography values of the bone, and maximum torque and resonance frequency values at dental implant placement. J Oral Rehabil 2006 33 : 881 888.
20. Fanuscu MI, Chang TL. Three-dimensional morphometric analysis of human cadaver bone: microstructural data from maxilla and mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004 15 : 213 218.
21. Hanazawa T, Sano T, Seki K, Okano T. Radiologic measurements of the mandible: a comparison between CT-reformatted and conventional tomographic images. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004 15 : 226 232.
22. Norton RM, Gamble C. Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001 12 : 79 84.
23. Ikumi N, Tsutsumi S. Assessment of correlation between computerized tomography values of the bone and cutting torque values at implant placement: a clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005 20 : 253 260.
24. Shapurian T, Damoulis PD, Reiser GM, Griffin TJ, Rand WM. Quantitative evaluation of bone density using the Hounsfield index. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006 21 : 290 297.
25. Wyatt CC, Pharoah MJ. Imaging techiques and image interpretation for dental implant treatment. Int J Prosthodont 1998 11 : 442 452.
26. Lundgren S, Anderson S, Gualini F, Sennerby L. Bone reformation with sinus membrane elevation: a new surgical technique for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004 6 : 165 173.
27. Cann CE. Quantitative CT for determination of bone mineral density: a review. Radiology 1988 166 : 509 522.
28. Lindh C, Nilsson M, Klinge B, Petersson A. Quantitative computed tomography of trabecular bone in the mandible. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1996 25 : 146 150.
29. Martinez H, Davarpanah M, Missika P, Celletti R, Lazzara R. Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001 12 : 423 432.
30. O'Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Influence of implant taper on the primary and secondary stability of osseointegrated titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004 15 : 474 480.
31. Khang W, Feldman S, Hawley CE, Gunsolley J. A multi-center study comparing dual acid-etched and machined-surfaced implants in various bone qualities. J Periodontol 2001 72 : 1384 1390.
32. O'Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Jagger D, Meredith N. A comparison of two methods of enhancing implant primary stability. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004 6 : 48 57.
33. Von Wovern N. General and oral aspects of osteoporosis: a review. Clin Oral Invest 2001 5 : 71 82.
34. Von Wovern N, Westergaard J, Kollerup G. Bone mineral content and bone metabolism in young adults with severe periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 2001 28 : 583 588.