Assessment of correlation between computerized tomography values of the bone and cutting torque values at implant placement: A clinical study

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 253-260

  Ikumi, Noriharu ^a   Tsutsumi, Sadami ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bone quality; Computerized tomography; Dental implants; Torque

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DRILL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TORQUE;

BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TORQUE;

EID: 17844379203     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Tolman DE, Laney WR. Tissue-integrated dental prostheses: The first 78 months of experience at the Mayo Clinic. Mayo Clin Proc 1993;68:323-331.
2. Lazzara R, Siddiqui AA, Binon P, et al. Retrospective multicenter analysis of 3i endosseous dental implants placed over a five-year period. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:73-83.
3. Bergendal T, Engquist B. Implant-supported overdentures: A longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:253-262.
4. Grunder U. Immediate functional loading of immediate implants in edentulous arches: Two-year results. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2001;21:545-551.
5. Lekholm U, Adell R, Brånemark P-I. Complications. In: Brånemark P-I, Zarb GA, Albrektson T. Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence, 1985:233-240.
6. Morris HF, Ochi S, Orenstein IH, Petrazzuolo V. AICRG, Part V: Factors influencing implant stability at placement and their influence on survival of Ankylos implants. J Oral Implantol 2004;30:162-170.
7. Balshi TJ, Wolfinger GJ, Balshi SF II. Analysis of 356 pterygomaxillary implants in edentuluous arches for fixed prosthesis anchorage: A 3-year clinical prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:398-406.
8. Mecall RA, Rosenfeld AL. The influence of residual ridge resorption patterns on implant fixture placement and tooth position. 2. Presurgical determination of prosthesis type and design. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1992;12:32-51.
9. Verde MA, Morgano SM. A dual-purpose stent for the implant-supported prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:276-280.
10. Sethi A. Precise site location for implants using CT scans: A technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:433-438.
11. Johansson P. Assessment of bone quality from cutting resistance during implant surgery. Int J Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:279-288.
12. Rothman SLG. Interactive implant surgical planning with SIM/plant. In: Dental Applications of Computerized Tomography. Chicago: Quintessence, 1998:139-152.
13. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: Brånemark P-I, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (eds). Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry.Chicago: Quintessence, 1985:199-209.
14. Testori T, Wiseman L, Woolfe S, Porter SS. A prospective multicenter clinical study of the Osseotite implant: Four-year interim report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:193-200.
15. Becker W, Becker BE, Alsuwyed A, Al-Mubarak S. Long-term evaluation of 282 implants in maxillary and mandibular molar positions: A prospective study. J Periodontol 1999;70:896-901.
16. Tinsley D, Watson CJ, Ogden AR. A survey of U.K. centres on implant failures. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:14-18.
17. Nevins M, Langer B. The successful application of osseointegrated implants to the posterior jaw: A long-term retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:428-432.
18. Albrektsson T, Dahl E, Enbom L, et al. Osseointegrated oral implants: A Swedish multicenter study of 8139 consecutively inserted Nobelpharma implants. J Periodontol 1988;59:287-296.
19. Drago CJ. Rates of osseointegration of dental implants with regard to anatomical location. J Prosthodont 1992;1:29-31.
20. Ulm C, Kneissel M, Schedle A, et al. Characteristic features of trabecular bone in edentulous maxillae. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:459-467.
21. Truhlar RS, Orenstein IH, Morris HF, Ochi S. Distribution of bone quality in patients receiving endosseous dental implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;55(12 suppl 5):38-45.
22. Razavi R, Zena RB, Khan Z, Gould AR. Anatomic site evaluation of edentulous maxillae for dental implant placement: A 3-year clinical prospective study. J Prosthodont 1995;4:90-94.
23. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Grondahl K, Bergstrom C, Back T, Lekholm U. On cutting torque measurements during implant placement. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 1999;1:75-83.
24. Sugaya K. Study on method for examining bone quality for dental implant. Relationship between cutting force and bone mineral content [in Japanese]. Shikwa Gakuho 1990;90:607-633.
25. Rogers LF. Metabolic, endocrine, and related bone diseases. In: Juhl JH, Crummy AB (eds). Essentials of Radiologic Imaging. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott, 1993:215-254.
26. Lindh C, Nilsson M, Klinge B, Petersson A. Quantitative computed tomography of trabecular bone in the mandible. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1996;25:146-150.
27. Kido H, Schulz EE, Kumar A, Lozada J, Saha S. Implant diameter and bone density: Effect on initial stability and pull-out resistance. J Oral Implantol 1997;23:163-169.
28. Lindh C, Petersson A, Klinge B, Nilsson M .Trabecular bone volume and bone mineral density in the mandible. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997;26:101-106.
29. Lind PM, Lind L, Larsson S, Orberg J. Torsional testing and peripheral quantitative computed tomography in rat humerus. Bone 2001;29:265-270.
30. Kopperdahl DL, Morgan EF, Keaveny TM. Quantitative computed tomography estimates of the mechanical properties of human vertebral trabecular bone. J Orthop Res 2002;20:801-805.
31. Homolka P, Beer A, Birkfellner W, et al. Bone mineral density measurement with dental quantitative CT prior to dental implant placement in cadaver mandibles: Pilot study. Radiology 2002;224:247-252.
32. Norton MR, Gamble C. Bone classification: An objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:79-84.
33. Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:571-577.
34. Tardieu PB, Vrielinck L, Escolano E. Computer-assisted implant placement. A case report: Treatment of the mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:599-604.
35. O'Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Measurements comparing the initial stability of five designs of dental implants: A human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:85-92.
36. Buser D, Nydegger T, Oxland T, et al. Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surfaced biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;45:75-83.
37. Khang W, Feldman S, Hawley CE, Gunsolley J. A multi-center study comparing dual acid-etched and machined-surfaced implants in various bone qualities. J Periodontol 2001;72:1384-1390.