Effective dosages for recording Veraviewepocs dental panoramic images: analog film, digital, and panoramic scout for CBCT

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology

Volumn 106, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 571-577

  Garcia Silva, Maria Alves ^a   Wolf, Ulrich ^b   Heinicke, Frank ^b   Gründler, Katharina ^b   Visser, Heiko ^c   Hirsch, Edgar ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF GOIÁS   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^c Dental School ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY BURDEN; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; RADIOMETRY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; X RAY FILM;

ADULT; BODY BURDEN; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; RADIOMETRY; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 55049106024     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03.031     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Paatero Y.V. A new tomographical method for radiographing curved surfaces. Acta Radiol 32 (1949) 177-184
2. Paatero Y.V. Pantomography and orthopantomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 14 (1961) 947-953
3. Kantor M.L. Trends in the prescription of radiographs for comprehensive care patients in U.S. and Canadian dental schools. J Dent Educ 57 (1993) 794-797
4. Langlais R.P., Langland O.E., and Nortje C.J. Decision making in dental radiography. In: Langlais R.P., Langland O.E., and Nortje C.J. (Eds). Diagnostic imaging of the jaws (1995), Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1-17
5. Tyndall D.A., and Brooks S.L. Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 89 (2000) 630-637
6. Gijbels F., Sanderink G., Bou Serhal C., Pauewls H., and Jacobs R. Organ dose and subjective image quality in indirect digital panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 30 (2001) 308-313
7. Clark D.E., Danforth R.A., Barnes R.W., and Burtch M.L. Radiation absorbed dose from dental implant radiography: a comparison of linear tomography, CT scan, and panoramic and intra-oral techniques. J Oral Implantol 3 (1990) 156-164
8. Frederiksen N.L., Benson B.W., and Sokolowski T.W. Effective dose and risk assessment from film tomography used for dental implant diagnostics. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 23 (1994) 123-127
9. Stavropolous A., and Wenzel A. Accuracy of cone beam dental CT, intraoral digital and conventional film radiography for the detection of periapical lesions. An ex vivo study in pig jaws. Clin Oral Invest 11 (2006) 101-106
10. Lofthag-Hansen S., Huumonen S., Gröndahl K., and Gröndahl H.-G. Limited cone-beam CT and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of periapical pathology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 103 (2007) 114-119
11. Honda K., Arai Y., Kashima M., Takano Y., Sawada K., Ejima K., and Iwai K. Evaluation of the usefulness of the limited cone-beam CT (3DX) in the assessment of the thickness of the roof of the glenoid fossa of the temporomandibular joint. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 33 (2004) 391-395
12. Nakajima A., Sameshima G.T., Arai Y., Homme Y., Shimizu N., and Dougherty H. Two- and three-dimensional orthodontic imaging using limited cone beam-computed tomography. Angle Orthod 75 (2005) 895-903
13. Swennen G.R.J., and Schtyser F. Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130 (2006) 410-416
14. Tsuchida R., Araki K., and Okano T. Evaluation of a limited cone-beam volumetric imaging system: comparison with film radiography in detecting incipient proximal caries. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 104 (2007) 412-416
15. Haiter-Neto F., Pontual A.D., Frydenberg M., and Wenzel A. Detection of noncavitated approximal caries lesion in digital images from seven solid-state receptors with particular focus on task-specific enhancement filters. An ex vivo study in human teeth. [e-pub ahead of print]. Clin Oral Invest (2008) Jan. 22
16. Krennmair G., Krainhofer M., Maier H., weilander M., and Piehslinger E. Computerized tomography-assisted calculation of sinus augmentation volume. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 21 (2006) 907-913
17. Dula K., Mini R., van der Stelt P.F., Sanderink G.C.H., Schneeberger P., and Buser D. Comparative dose measurements by spiral tomography for preimplant diagnosis: the Scanora machine versus the Cranex Tome radiography unit. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 91 (2001) 735-742
18. Mozzo P., Procacci C., Tacconi A., Tinazzi Martini P., and Bergamo Andreis I.A. A new volumetric machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 8 (1998) 1558-1564
19. Arai Y., Tammisalo E., Hashimoto K., and Shinoda K. Development of a computed tomographic apparatus for dental use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 28 (1999) 245-248
20. Underhill T.E., Chilvarquer I., Kimura K., Langlais R.P., McDavid W.D., Preece J.W., et al. Radiobiologic risk estimation from dental radiology. Part I. Absorbed doses to critical organs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 66 (1988) 111-120
21. Lecomber A.R., and Faulkner K. Dose reduction in panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 22 (1993) 69-73
22. Farman T.T., Kelly M.S., and Farman A.G. The OP 100 Digipan-evaluation of the image layer, magnification factors, and dosimetry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 83 (1997) 281-287
23. Dula K., Sanderink G., van der Stelt P.F., Mini R., Nat P., and Buser D. Effects of dose reduction on the detectability of standardized radiolucent lesions in digital panoramic radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 86 (1998) 227-233
24. Farman A.G., and Farman T.T. Panoramic dental radiography using a charge-coupled device receptor. J Dig Imag 11 (1998) 166-168
25. Gijbels F., Jacobs R., Bogaerts R., Debaveye D., Verlinden S., and Sanderink G. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: patient exposure. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 34 (2005) 145-149
26. Poppe B., Looe H.K., Pfaffenberger A., Chofor N., Eenboom F., Sering M., Rühmann A., et al. Dose-area product measurements in panoramic dental radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 123 (2007) 131-134
27. 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. htpp://www.icrp.org Accessed April 5, 2007
28. Schulze D., Heiland M., Thurman H., and Adam G. Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 33 (2004) 83-86
29. Tsilakis K., Donta C., Gavala S., Karayianni K., Kamenopoulou V., and Hourdakis C.J. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose cone beam CT. Eur J Radiol 56 (2005) 413-417
30. Schulze D., Heiland M., Thurman H., and Adam G. Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 33 (2004) 83-86
31. Ludlow J.B., Davies-Ludlow L.E., Brooks S.L., and Howeerton W.B. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CBMercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35 (2006) 219-226
32. Ludlow J.B., Davies-Ludlow L.E., and Brooks S.L. Dosimetry of two direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 32 (2003) 229-234
33. Mah J.K., Danforth R.A., Bumann A., and Hatcher D. Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 96 (2003) 508-513
34. Cohnen M., Kemper J., Mobes O., Pawelzik J., and Modder U. Radiation dose in dental radiology. Eur Radiol 12 (2002) 634-637
35. Visser H, Hermann KP, Pfeiffer T, Umlauf J, Kruger W, Harder D. Abteilung Parodontologie, Zentrum Zahn- Mund- und Kieferheikund. Georg-August-Universität, Gottingen, Germany.
36. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP Publication 60. Ann ICRP 21 (1991) 1-201
37. Lecomber A.R., Downes S.L., Mokhtari M., and Faulkner K. Optimisation of patient doses in programmable dental panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 29 (2000) 107-112
38. Hayakawa Y., Kobayashi N., Kuroyanagi K., and Nishizawa K. Paediatric absorbed doses from rotational panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 30 (2001) 285-292
39. Ekestube A., Thilander-Klang A., Lith A., and Gröndahl H.-G. Effective and organ doses from scanography and zonography: a comparison with periapical radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 33 (2004) 87-92
40. Ngan D.C.S., Kharbanda O.P., Geenty J.P., and Darendeliler M.A. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs. Aust Orthod J 19 (2003) 67-74
41. Danforth R.A., and Clark D.E. Effective dose from radiation absorbed during a panoramic examination with a new generation machine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 89 (2000) 236-243
42. Hayakawa Y., Kobayashi N., Kousuge Y., Fujimori H., and Kuroyanagi K. Absorbed doses modified by exposure settings with rotational panoramic radiography. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 35 (1994) 121-125
43. Kaeppler G., Dietz K., and Reinert S. The effect of dose reduction on the detection of anatomical structures on panoramic radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35 (2006) 271-277