Surgery for tubal infertility

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn , Issue 3, 2008, Pages

  Pandian, Zabeena ^a   Akande, Valentine A ^b   Harrild, Kirsten ^c   Bhattacharya, Siladitya ^a  

^a ABERDEEN MATERNITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b Directorate of Public Health   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIRTH RATE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; LIVE BIRTH; PREGNANCY; REVIEW; TUBAL INFERTILITY; TUBAL SURGERY;

EID: 55049099278     PISSN: 1469493X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006415.pub2     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Ahmad 2006 Ahmad G, Watson A, Vanderckhove P, Lilford R. Techniques for pelvic surgery in subfertility. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000221.pub3]
2. Akande 2004 Akande VA, Cahill DJ, Wardle PG, Rutherford AJ, Jenkins JM. The predictive value of the 'Hull & Rutherford' classification for tubal damage. British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2004;111:123-41.
3. Benadiva 1995 Benadiva CA, Kligman I, Davis O, Rozenwaks Z. In vitro fertilisation versus tubal surgery: Is pelvic reconstructive surgery obsolete?. Fertility and Sterility 1995;64:1051-61.
4. Camus 1999 Camus E, Poncelet C, Goffinet F, Wainer B, Merlet F, Nisand I, et al.Pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization in cases of tubal infertility with and without hydrosalpinx: a meta-analysis of published comparative studies. Human Reproduction 1999;14(5):1243-49.
5. Cohlen 2002 Cohlen BJ, Hughes E, te Velde ER. Intra-uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility (Protocol for a Cochrane Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003854]
6. Evers 1998 Evers JLH, de Haas HW, Land JA, Dumoulin JCM, Dunselman GAJ. Treatment-independent pregnancy rate in patients with severe reproductive disorders. Human Reproduction 1998;13(5):1206-9.
7. Filippini 1996 Filippini F, Darai E, Benifla JL, Renolleau C, Sebban E, Vlastos G, et al.Distal tubal surgery: a critical review of 104 laparoscopic distal tuboplasty. French. Journal de Gynécologie, Obstétrique et Biologie de al Reproduction (Paris) 1996;25:471-8.
8. Gomel 2006 Gomel V, McComb PF. Microsurgery for tubal infertility. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 2006;51(3):177-84.
9. HFEA 2005 Balen A. Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome - A short report for the HFEA. www.HFEA.gov.uk February 2005.
10. Honore 1999 Honore GM, Holden AE, Schenken RS. Pathophysiology and management of proximal tubal blockage. Fertility and Sterility 1999;71:785-95.
11. Marana 1988a Marana R, Quagliarello J. Proximal tubal occlusion: microsurgery versus in vitro fertilization-a review. International Journal of Fertility 1988;33:107-15.
12. Marana 1988b Marana R, Quagliarello J. Proximal tubal occlusion: microsurgery versus IVF-a review. International Journal of Fertility 1988;33:338-40.
13. Mosgaard 1996 Mosgaard B, Hertz J, Steenstrup BR, Soorensen SS, Lindhard A, Anderson A N. Surgical management of tubal infertility: A regional study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1996;75(5): 469-74.
14. NICE 2004 National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health. Fertility: Assessment and treatment for people with fertility problems. Clinical guideline London: RCOG Press 2004.
15. Oelsner 1994 Oelsner G, Sivan E, Goldenberg M, Carp H, Admon D, Mashiach S. Should lysis of adhesions be performed when in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer are available?. Human Reproduction 1994;9:2339-41.
16. Paton 1987 Paton PE, Williams TJ, Coulam CB. Microsurgical reconstruction of the proximal oviduct. Fertility and Sterility 1987;47:35-9.
17. SART 2003 American Society Reproductive Medicine / Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2003 results generated from the American Society Reproductive Medicine / Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Registry 2003.
18. SART 2005 American Society Reproductive Medicine/ Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2005 results generated from the American Society Reproductive Medicine/ Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Registry 2005.
19. Serafini 1989 Serafini P, Batzofin J. Diagnosis of female infertility. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 1989;34:29-40.
20. Singhal 1991 Singhal V, Li TC, Cooke ID. An analysis of factors influencing the outcome of 232 consecutive tubal microsurgery cases. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1991;98:628-36.
21. Tomazevic 1991 Tomazevic T, Ribic-Pucelj M. Microsurgery and invitro fertilisation/embryo transfer for infertilty resulting from distal tubal lesions. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine 1991;36:527-30.
22. Watson 1990 Watson AJ, Gupta JK, O'Donnovan P, Dalton ME, Lilford RJ. The results of tubal surgery in the treatment of infertility in two nonspecialist hospitals. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1990;97:561-8.
23. Wiedemann 1996 Wiedemann R, Sterzik K, Gombisch V, Stuckensen J, Montag M. Beyond recanalizing proximal tubal occlusion: the argument for further diagnosis and classification. Human Reproduction 1996;11(5):986- 91.
24. Winston 1991 Winston RM, Margara RA. Microsurgical salpingostomy is not an obsolete procedure. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1991;98:637-42.
25. Wu 1988 Wu CH, Gocial B. A pelvic scoring system for infertility surgery. International Journal of Fertility 1988;33:341-46.