Surgical management of tubal infertility

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 75, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 469-474

  Mosgaard, Berit ^a,d   Hertz, Jens ^a   Steenstrup, Birgit Ravn ^b   Sørensen, Søren Stampe ^b   Lindhard, Anette ^c   Andersen, Anders Nyboe ^c  

^a GENTOFTE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b GLOSTRUP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^d NONE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Adhesiolysis; Infertility; Regional study; Salpingostomy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DENMARK; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; UTERINE TUBE; UTERUS SURGERY;

EID: 0029957327     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00016349609033356     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Lilford RJ, Watson AJ. Commentary. Has in-vitro fertilization made salpingostomy obsolete? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 557-60.
2. Winston RM, Margara RA. Microsurgical salpingostomy is not an obsolete procedure. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98: 637-42.
3. Schlaff WD, Hassiakos DK, Damewood MD, Rock JA. Neosalpingostomy for distal tubal obstruction: prognostic factors and impact of surgical technique. Fertil Steril 1990; 54: 984-90.
4. Donnez J, Casanas-Roux F. Prognostic factors of fimbrial microsurgery. Fertil Steril 1986; 46: 200-4.
5. Watson AJS, Gupta JK, O'Donovan P, Dalton ME, Lilford RJ. The results of tubal surgery in the treatment of infertility in two non-specialist hospitals. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 561-8.
6. Singhal V, Li TC, Cooke ID. An analysis of factors influencing the outcome of 232 consecutive tubal microsurgery cases. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98: 628-36.
7. Dubuisson JB, Chapron C, Morice PX, Aubriot F, Foulot H, de Joliniere JB. Laparoscopic salpingostomy: Fertility results according to the tubal mucosal appearance. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 334-9.
8. Swolin K. Electromicrosurgery and salpingostomy: long term results. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975; 121: 418-9.
9. Russell JB, DeCherney AH, Laufer N, Polan ML, Naftolin F. Neosalpingostomy: comparison of 24- and 72-month follow-up time shows increased pregnancy rate. Fertil Steril 1986; 45: 296-8.
10. Bateman BG, Nunley WC, Kitchin III JD. Surgical management of distal tubal obstruction - are we making progress ? Fertil Steril 1987; 48: 523-42.
11. Vasquez G, Winston RLM, Boeckx W, Gordts S, Brosens IA. The epithelium of human hydrosalpinges: a light optical and scanning electron microscopic study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1983; 90: 764-70.
12. Reiss H. Management of tubal infertility in the 1990's. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98: 619-23.
13. Rock JA, Atayama P, Martin EJ, Woodruff JD, Jones HW. Factors influencing the success of salpingostomy techniques for distal fimbrial obstruction. Obstet Gynecol 1978; 52: 591-6.
14. Gomel V, Taylor PJ. In vitro fertilization versus reconstructive tubal surgery. J of Assisted Reprod Genetics 1992; 9: 306-9.
15. FIVNAT. French national IVF registry: analysis of 1986 to 1990 data. Fertil Steril 1993; 59: 587-90.
16. Strandell A, Walderström U, Nielsson L, Hamberger L. Hydrosalpinx reduces in-vitro-fertilization/embryo transfer pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 861-3.
17. Andersen AN, Yue Z, Meng FJ, Petersen K. Low implantation rate after IVF in patients with hydrosalpinges diagnosed by ultrasonography. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 1935-8.
18. Boer-Meisel ME, te Velde ER, Habbema JDF, Kardaun JWPF. Predicting the pregnancy outcome in patients treated for hydrosalpinx: a prospective study. Fertil Steril 1986; 45: 23-9.
19. Mage G, Pouly J-L, de Jolinière JB, Chabrand S, Riouallon A, Bruhat M-A. A preoperative classification to predict the intrauterine and ectopic pregnancy rates after distal tubal microsurgery. Fertil Steril 1986; 46: 807-10.
20. The American Fertility Society. The American Fertility Society classification of adnexal adsoins, distal tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 944-55.