Relative rates of protein transmission through poly(acrylonitrile) based ultrafiltration membranes

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 136, Issue 1-2, 1997, Pages 13-23

  Musale, D A ^a   Kulkarni, S S ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHEMICAL LABORATORY   (India)

Author keywords

Fouling; Hydrophilicity; Plasma proteins; Ultrafiltration; Zeta potential

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION; BINARY MIXTURES; COPOLYMERS; ELECTROSTATICS; FOULING; HEMOGLOBIN; PH EFFECTS; POLYACRYLONITRILES; POLYAMIDES; ULTRAFILTRATION;

HOMOPOLYMERS; HYDROPHILICITY; HYDROPHOBICITY; ISOELECTRIC POINTS; PLASMA PROTEINS; ZETA POTENTIAL;

POLYMERIC MEMBRANES;

ACRYLAMIDE; BOVINE SERUM ALBUMIN; COPOLYMER; HEMOGLOBIN; PLASMA PROTEIN; POLYACRYLONITRILE;

MEMBRANE; PROTEIN; ULTRAFILTRATION;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; ELECTRICITY; HYDROPHILICITY; IONIC STRENGTH; ISOELECTRIC POINT; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; ULTRAFILTRATION; ZETA POTENTIAL;

EID: 0343907141     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(97)00179-8     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. H. Miyama, H. Yoshida and Y. Nosaka, Negatively charged polyacrylonitrile graft copolymer membrane for permeation and separation of plasma proteins, Makromol. Chem., Rapid Commun., 9 (1988) 57-61.
2. M. Nyström, Fouling of unmodified and modified polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes by ovalbumin, J. Membrane Sci., 44 (1989) 183-196.
3. S. Nakao, H. Osada, H. Kurata, T. Suru and S. Kimura, Separation of proteins by charged ultrafiltration membranes. Desalination, 70 (1988) 191-205.
4. S. Saksena and A.L. Zydney, Effect of solution pH and ionic strength on the separation of albumin from immunoglobulins (IgG) by selective filtration, Biotech. Bioeng., 43 (1994) 960-968.
5. R.H.C.M. van Eijndhoven, S. Saksena and A.L. Zydney, Protein fractionation using electrostatic interactions in membrane filtration, Biotech. Bioeng., 48 (1995) 406-414.
6. F. Nau, F.L. Kerhervé, J. Leonil and G. Daufin, Selective separation of tryptic β-casein peptides through ultrafiltration membranes: Influence of ionic interactions, Biotech. Bioeng., 46 (1995) 246-253.
7. A.G. Fane, C.J.D. Fell and A.G. Waters, Ultrafiltration of protein solutions through partially permeable membranes, J. Membrane Sci., 16 (1983) 211-224.
8. J.H. Hanemaaijer, T. Robbertson, Th. van den Boomgaard and J.W. Gunnick, Fouling of ultrafiltration membranes; The role of protein adsorption and salt precipitation, J. Membrane Sci., 40 (1989) 199-217.
9. A. Higuchi, Y. Ishida and T. Nakagawa, Surface modified polysulfone membranes: separation of mixed proteins and optical resolution of tryptophan, Desalination, 90 (1993) 127-136.
10. A.G. Fane, C.J.D. Fell and A. Suki, The effect of pH and ionic environment on the ultrafiltration of protein solutions with retentive membranes., J. Membrane Sci., 16 (1983) 195-210.
11. S. Nakatsuka and A.S. Michaels, Transport and separation of proteins by ultrafiltration through sorptive and non-sorptive membranes, J. Membrane Sci., 69 (1992) 189-211.
12. E. Iritani, Y. Mukai and T. Murase, Upward dead-end ultrafiltration of binary protein mixtures, Sep. Sci. Technol., 30(3) (1995) 369-382.
13. A.-K. Kontturi, K. Kontturi and M. Vuoristo, Separation of proteins of nearly the same size but different isoelectric points by convective electrophoresis, Acta Chemica Scandinavica, 50 (1996) 102-106.
14. D.A. Musale and S.S. Kulkarni, Fouling reduction in Poly(acrylonitrile-co-acrylamide) ultrafiltration membranes, J. Membrane Sci., 111(1) (1996) 49-56.
15. G.I. Loeb and H.A. Scheraga, Hydrodynamic and thermodynamic properties of bovine serum albumin at low pH, J. Phys. Chem., 60 (1956) 1633.
16. E. Matthiasson, The role of macromolecular adsorption in fouling of ultrafiltration membranes, J. Membrane Sci., 16 (1983) 23-36.
17. W. Norde, Driving forces for protein adsorption at solid surfaces, Macromol. Symp., 103 (1996) 5-18.
18. W.F. Blatt, A. Dravid, A.S. Michaels and L. Nelsen, Solute polarization and cake formation in membrane ultrafiltration: causes, consequences and control techniques, in J.E. Flinn (Ed.), Membrane Science and Technology, Plenum Press, New York, 1970.
19. P. Doherty and G.B. Benedek, The effect of electric charge on the diffusion of macromolecules, J. Chem. Phys., 61(12) (1974) 5426-5434.
20. G. Capannelli, F. Vigo and S. Munari, Ultrafiltration membranes - Characterization methods, J. Membrane Sci., 15 (1983) 289-313.
21. V.L. Vilker, C.K. Colton and K.A. Smith, The osmotic pressure of concentrated protein solutions: effects of concentration and pH in saline solutions of bovine serum albumin, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 79 (1981) 548-566.
22. J.Th.G. Overbeek and H.G. Bungenberg De Long, Sols of macromolecular colloids with electrolytic nature, in H.R. Kruyt (Ed.), Colloid Science, Vol. II, Elsevier, New York, 1949, pp. 191.
23. F. Haurowitz, The chemistry and function of proteins, 2nd edn., Academic Press, New York, 1963 pp. 164, 190.
24. S. Küpkü, S. Margit and U.B. Sleytr, Influence of covalent attachment of low molecular weight substances on the rejection and adsorption properties of crystalline proteinaceous ultrafiltration membranes, Desalination, 90 (1993) 65-76.
25. G.B. van den Berg and C.A. Smolders, Concentration polarization phenomena during dead-end ultrafiltration of protein mixtures: The influence of solute-solute interactions, J. Membrane Sci., 47 (1989) 1-24.
26. B.C. Barisas, Hemoglobin, in H.-J. Hinz (Ed.), Thermodynamic Data for Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Springer, Berlin, 1986.