Matching cognitive characteristics of actors and tasks in information systems engineering

Knowledge-Based Systems

Volumn 21, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 764-785

  Overbeek, S J ^a   van Bommel, P ^b  

^a e office BV   (Netherlands)

^b Erik) Proper H A   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cognitive characteristics; Fuzzy match assessments; Information systems; Matchmaking; Task allocation

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

CASE STUDIES; COGNITIVE CHARACTERISTICS; FORMAL FRAMEWORKS; FUZZY MATCH ASSESSMENTS; INDUCTIVE; INFORMATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERINGS; MATCHING; MATCHMAKING; POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS; PROTOTYPE IMPLEMENTATIONS; RESEARCH APPROACHES; RESEARCH STRATEGIES; TASK ALLOCATION;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

EID: 54949154551     PISSN: 09507051     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2008.03.032     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Staab S., Studer R., Schnurr H., and Sure Y. Knowledge processes and ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16 1 (2001) 26-34
2. Kako E. Thematic role properties of subjects and objects. Cognition 101 1 (2006) 1-42
3. Weir C., Nebeker J., Bret L., Campo R., Drews F., and LeBar B. A cognitive task analysis of information management strategies in a computerized provider order entry environment. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 14 1 (2007) 65-75
4. Meiran N. Modeling cognitive control in task-switching. Psychological Research 63 3-4 (2000) 234-249
5. Hertwig R., Barron G., Weber E., and Erev I. The role of information sampling in risky choice. In: Fiedler K., and Juslin P. (Eds). Information Sampling and Adaptive Cognition (2006), Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA 72-91
6. Koehler D. Explanation, imagination, and confidence in judgment. Psychological Bulletin 110 3 (1991) 499-519
7. R-Moreno M., Borrajo D., Cesta A., and Oddi A. Integrating planning and scheduling in workflow domains. Expert Systems with Applications 33 2 (2007) 389-406
8. Joshi K., Sarker S., and Sarker S. Knowledge transfer within information systems development teams: examining the role of knowledge source attributes. Decision Support Systems 43 2 (2007) 322-335
9. Shakshuki E., Prabhu O., and Tomek I. FCVW agent framework. Information and Software Technology 48 6 (2006) 385-392
10. van der Aalst W., and ter Hofstede A. Verification of workflow task structures: a Petri-net-based approach. Information Systems 25 1 (2000) 43-69
11. S. Overbeek, P. van Bommel, H. Proper, D. Rijsenbrij, Characterizing knowledge intensive tasks indicating cognitive requirements - scenarios in methods for specific tasks, in: J. Ralyté, S. Brinkkemper, B. Henderson-Sellers (Eds.), Proceedings of the IFIP TC8/ WG8.1 Working Conference on Situational Method Engineering: Fundamentals and Experiences, vol. 244, Geneva, Switzerland, Springer, Boston, USA, 2007, pp. 100-114.
12. S. Overbeek, P. van Bommel, H. Proper, D. Rijsenbrij, Matching cognitive characteristics of actors and tasks, in: R. Meersman, T. Zari (Eds.), On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2007: DOA, CoopIS, ODBASE, GADA, and IS, Vilamoura, Portugal, November 25-30, 2007, Proceedings, Part I, vol. 4803 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vilamoura, Portugal, EU, Springer, Berlin, Germany, EU, 2007, pp. 371-380.
13. H. Sol, Simulation in information systems, Ph.D. thesis, University of Groningen, The Netherlands, EU, 1982.
14. Churchman C. The Design of Inquiring Systems: Basic Concepts of Systems and Organization (1971), Basic Books, New York, NY, USA
15. de Vreede G., Jones N., and Mgaya R. Exploring the application and acceptance of group support systems in africa. Journal of Management Information Systems 15 3 (1998) 197-234
16. Y. Wang, E. van de Kar, G. Meijer, Designing mobile solutions for mobile workers: Lessons learned from a case study, in: ICEC'05: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Electronic Commerce, Xi'an, China, ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 2005, pp. 582-589.
17. Cruse D. Some thoughts on agentivity. Journal of Linguistics 9 (1973) 11-23
18. Dowty D. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67 3 (1991) 547-619
19. Nonaka I., and Takeuchi H. The Knowledge Creating Company (1995), Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA
20. Davenport T. Thinking for a Living - How to Get Better Performances and Results From Knowledge Workers (2005), Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, USA
21. Hoppenbrouwers S., and Proper H. Knowledge discovery: De zoektocht naar verhulde en onthulde kennis. DB/Magazine 10 7 (1999) 21-25 in Dutch
22. Halpin T. Information Modeling and Relational Databases, From Conceptual Analysis to Logical Design (2001), Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, USA
23. Zadeh L. Toward a generalized theory of uncertainty (GTU): an outline. Information Sciences 172 1-2 (2005) 1-40
24. Turner M. Microsoft Solutions Framework Essentials (2006), Microsoft Press, Redmond, WA, USA
25. Shu G., Rana O., Avis N., and Dingfang C. Ontology-based semantic matchmaking approach. Advances in Engineering Software 38 1 (2007) 59-67
26. Vivacqua A., Moreno M., and de Souza J. Profiling and matchmaking strategies in support of opportunistic collaboration. In: Meersman R., Zahir T., and Schmidt D. (Eds). On The Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2003: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE (2003), Springer, Berlin, Germany, EU 162-177
27. Coll R., and Coll J. Cognitive match interface design, a base concept for guiding the development of user friendly computer application packages. Journal of Medical Systems 13 4 (1989) 227-235
28. Ruiz M., Díaz M., Soler F., and Pérez J. Adaptation in current e-learning systems. Computer Standards & Interfaces 30 1-2 (2008) 62-70
29. Jaspers M., Steen T., van den Bos C., and Geenen M. The think aloud method: a guide to user interface design. International Journal of Medical Informatics 73 11-12 (2004) 781-795
30. Newell A., and Simon H. Human Problem Solving (1972), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA
31. Vessey I. Cognitive fit: a theory-based analysis of the graphs versus tables literature. Decision Sciences 22 2 (1991) 219-240