Influence of the mode of graphical representation on the perception of product aesthetic and emotional features: An exploratory study

International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

Volumn 38, Issue 11-12, 2008, Pages 942-952

  Artacho Ramirez M A ^a   Diego Mas, J A ^a   Alcaide Marzal, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cognitive response; e Commerce; Graphical interaction; Graphical representation; Product design; Symbolic value

Indexed keywords

COMMERCE; DESIGN; ELECTROACOUSTIC TRANSDUCERS; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; GRAPHIC METHODS; INFORMATION THEORY; KETONES; PRODUCT DESIGN; SEMANTICS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

COGNITIVE RESPONSE; E-COMMERCE; GRAPHICAL INTERACTION; GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION; SYMBOLIC VALUE;

PROCESS ENGINEERING;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EMOTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SEMANTICS; STEREORADIOGRAPHY;

EID: 54949152704     PISSN: 01698141     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2008.02.020     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Alba J.W. The Effects of product knowledge on the comprehension, retention and evaluation of product information. Advances in Consumer Research 10 (1980) 577-580
2. Alcántara E., Artacho M.A., Gonzalez J.C., and Garcia A.C. Application of product semantics to footwear design. Part I-identification of footwear semantic space applying differential semantics. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 35 (2005) 713-725
3. Alcántara E., Artacho M.A., Gonzalez J.C., and Garcia A.C. Application of product semantics to footwear design. Part II-comparison of two clog designs using individual and compared semantic profiles. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 35 (2005) 727-735
4. Blackwell R.D., Miniard P.W., and Engel J.F. Consumer behaviour. ninth ed (2001), Dryden Press, Fort Worth
5. Bloch P.H. Seeking the ideal form: product design and consumer response. Journal of Marketing 59 (1995) 16-29
6. Bont de, C.J.P.M., 1992. Consumer evaluations of early product concepts. Doctoral Thesis, Delft University Press, Delft.
7. Crilly N., Moultrie J., and Clarkson P.J. Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design. Design Studies 25 (2004) 547-577
8. Dahan E., and Srinivasan V. The predictive power of internet-based product concept testing using visual depiction and animation. Journal of Product Innovation Management 17 (2000) 99-109
9. Desmet P. A multilayered model of product emotions. The Design Journal 6 (2003) 4-13
10. Dickinson J.R., and Wilby C.P. Concept testing with and without product trial. Journal of Product Innovation Management 14 (1997) 117-125
11. Dorta T., and Lalande P. The impact of virtual reality on the design process. Digital design studios: do computers make a difference?. Proceedings from the ACADIA 98 Conference, Quebec City (1998) 138-163
12. Edwards S.M., and Gangadharbatla H. The novelty of 3D product presentations online. Journal of Interactive Advertising 2 (2001)
13. Engelbrektsson P., Yesil O., and Karlsson I.C.M. Eliciting customer requirements in focus group interviews: can efficiency be increased?. Proceedings from the EIASM Seventh International Product Development Management Conference (2000)
14. Finn A. A theory of the consumer evaluation process for new product concepts. Research in Consumer Behaviour 1 (1985) 35-65
15. Gaggioli A., and Breining R. Perception and cognition in immersive virtual reality. In: Riva G., and Davide F. (Eds). Communications Through Virtual Technology: Identity, Community and Technology in the Internet Age (2001), IOS Press, Amsterdam
16. Gibson J.J. The senses considered as perceptual systems (1996), Houghton Mifflin, Boston
17. Hoch S.J., and Deighton J. Managing what consumers learn from experience. Journal of Marketing 53 (1989) 1-20
18. Holbrook M.B. Emotion in the consumption experience: toward a new model of the human consumer. In: Peterson R.A., Hoyer W.D., and Wilson W.R. (Eds). The Role of Affect in Consumer Behaviour: Emerging Theories and Applications (1985), Heath, Lexington, MA 17-52
19. Holbrook M.B., and Moore W.L. Feature interactions in consumer judgements of verbal versus pictorial presentations. Journal of Consumer Research 8 (1981) 103-113
20. Hsu S.H., Chuang M.C., and Chang C.C. A semantic differential study of designers' and users' product form perception. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 25 (2000) 375-391
21. Hubona G.S., Wheeler N.P., Shirah G.W., and Brandt M. The relative contributions of stereo, lighting, and background scenes in promoting 3D depth visualization. ACM Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction 6 (1999) 214-242
22. Jindo T., Hirasago K., and Nagamachi M. Development of a design support system for office chairs using 3-D graphics. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 15 (1995) 49-62
23. Johar J.S., and Sirgy M.J. Value-expressive versus utilitarian advertising appeals: when and why to use which appeal. Journal of Advertising 20 (1991) 23-33
24. Kaplan R., and Kaplan S. Cognition and Environment: Functioning in an Uncertain World (1982), Praeger Publishers, New York
25. Karlsson, M., Sperling, L., Hampf, J., 1998. Eliciting customers' requirements: product representations as mediating objects in focus group interviews. In: Fifth International Product Development Management Conference, Como.
26. Kaulio, M., 1997. Customer-focused product development: a practice-centered perspective. Doctoral Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg.
27. Kim J., Lee J., and Choi D. Designing emotionally evocative homepages: an empirical study of the quantitative relations between design factors and emotional dimensions. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59 (2003) 899-940
28. Knill D.C., and Saunders J.A. Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant?. Vision Research 43 (2003) 2539-2558
29. Küller R. Semantisk miljöbeskrivning (SMB) (1975), Psykologiförlaget, Stockholm
30. Leonard-Barton D. Inanimate integrators: a block of wood speaks. Design Management Journal, Summer 1991 (1991) 61-67
31. Levy S.J. Symbols for sale. Harvard Business Review 37 (1959) 117-124
32. Li H., Daugherty T.M., and Biocca F. Characteristics of virtual experience in e-commerce: a protocol analysis. Journal of Interactive Marketing 15 (2001) 13-30
33. Loosschilder G., and Ortt R.F. The effect of the realism of product representations on the validity of consumer evaluations. Proceedings from the 47th ESOMAR Marketing Research Congress, Davos (1994) 353-375
34. Louviere J.J. Do the parameters of choice models depend on differences in stimulus presentation: visual versus verbal presentations. Advances in Consumer Research 14 (1987) 79-82
35. Malhotra N.K. A scale to measure self-concepts, person concepts, and product concepts. Journal of Marketing Research 23 (1981) 456-464
36. Millar M.G., and Millar K.U. The effects of direct and indirect experience on affective and cognitive response and the attitude-behavior relation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 32 (1996) 561-579
37. Mills S., and Noyes J. Virtual reality: an overview of user-related design issues. Interacting with Computers 11 (1999) 375-386
38. Nakada K. Kansei engineering research on the design of construction machinery. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 19 (1997) 129-146
39. Nielsen J., and Tahir M. Homepage Usability: 50 Websites Deconstructed (2001), New Riders Publishing, Indianapolis
40. Nunnally J.C. Psychometric Theory (1978), McGraw-Hill, New York
41. Osgood C.E., Suci C.J., and Tannenbaum P.H. The Measurement of Meaning (1957), University of Illinois Press, Urbana pp. 76-124
42. Picard R., and Klein J. Computers that recognize and respond to user emotion: theoretical and practical implications. Interacting with Computers 14 (2002) 141-169
43. Schoormans J.P.L., Orrt R.J., and de Bont C.J.P.M. Enhancing concept test validity by using expert consumers. Journal of Product Innovation Management 12 (1995) 153-162
44. Schrage M. The cultures of prototyping. Design Management Journal, Winter 1993 (1993) 55-65
45. Sharples, S.C., Saikayasit, R., 2006. Effectiveness of virtual prototypes: perception of material properties in CAD and VR. In: 16th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, Maastricht, Netherlands.
46. Shavitt S. Evidence for predicting the effectiveness of value-expressive versus utilitarian appeals: a reply to Johar and Sirgy. Journal of Advertising 21 (1992) 47-51
47. Smith S.M., and Whitlark D.B. Men and women online: what makes them click?. Marketing Research 13 (2001) 20-25
48. Smith S.P., Johnston R.B., and Howard S. Vicarious experience in retail e-commerce: an inductive taxonomy of product evaluation support features. Information Systems and e-Business Management 3 (2005) 21-46
49. Söderman, M., 2001. Product representations: exploring computer-based technologies and customers' understanding of product concepts. Doctoral Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.
50. Spool J.M., Scanlon T., Schroeder W., Snyder C., and DeAngelo T. Web Site Usability: A Designer's Guide (1999), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco
51. Tanoue C., Ishizaka K., and Nagamachi M. Kansei engineering: a study on perception of vehicle interior image. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 19 (1997) 115-128
52. Tversky B., Morrison J.B., and Betrancourt M. Animation: can it facilitate?. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 57 (2002) 247-262
53. Ulrich K.T., and Eppinger S.D. Product Design and Development (1995), McGraw-Hill, New York
54. Vriens M., Looschilder G.H., Rosbergen E., and Wittink D. Verbal vs. realistic pictorial representations for including design-attributes in conjoint analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management 15 (1998) 455-467
55. Wilcox R.R. New Statistical Procedures for the Social Sciences: Modern Solutions to Basic Problems (1987), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ