Evaluation of parameters affecting earthquake damage by decision tree techniques

Natural Hazards

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 547-568

  Şengezer, Betül ^a   Ansal, Atilla ^b   Bilen, Ömer ^a  

^a YILDIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Earthquake; Parameters effecting earthquake damage; Vulnerability

Indexed keywords

BUILDING; DECISION ANALYSIS; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; EARTHQUAKE EVENT; EARTHQUAKE INTENSITY; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; GROUND MOTION; HOLISTIC APPROACH; PARAMETERIZATION;

AFYON; DINAR; ERZINCAN [TURKEY]; EURASIA; KOCAELI [TURKEY]; TURKEY;

EID: 54949119521     PISSN: 0921030X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-008-9238-2     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Akman S (1996) The emptily brick masonry problems with respect to earthquake resistance of brick masonry. In: Proceedings of TUBITAK Earthquake Symposium, Ankara, pp 185-190 (in Turkish)
2. Anagnos T (1998) Estimation damage and loss. Earthquake insurance: public policy perspectives from the western United States. Earthquake Insurance Summit, pp 199-201. http://www.sspc.org/Events/1998_Summit/ eqiperspectives5.html
3. Anastasiadis A, Demosthenous M, Karakostas Ch, Klimis N, Lekidis B, Margaris B, Papaioannou Ch, Papazachos C, Theodulidis N (1999) The Athens (GREECE) earthquake of September 7 1999: Preliminary report on strong motion data and structural response. Thessaloniki, Greece. http://www.itsak.gr/
4. Ansal A, Lav A (1995) Geotechnical factors in 1992 Erzincan earthquake. In: Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Seismic Zonation, vol 1. Nice, France, pp 667-674
5. Ansal A, Şengezer B, Iyisan R, Gençoǧlu S (1993) The damage distribution in March 13, 1992 earthquake and effects of geotechnical factors. In: Seco e Pinto P (ed) Soil dynamics and geotechnical earthquake engineering. Balkema, Netherlands, pp 413-434
6. Ansal A, Bardet JP, Bray JD, Cetin KÖ, Durgunoǧlu T, Erdik M, Kaya A, Ural D, Yilmaz T, Youd L (1999) Initial geotechnical observations of the August 17, 1999 Izmit earthquake. A report of the Turkey-US Geotechnical Reconnaissance Team. http://nisee.berkeley.edu/ turkey/report.html
7. Ansal A, Iyisan R, Güllü H (2001) Microtremor measurements for the microzonation of Dinar. Pure Appl Geophys 158(11):2525-2541
8. Asilhan M, Sahin M, Turan E, Kiliç H (2000) Geological and geotechnical investigation report for the revision of the Adapazari Urban Plan. Adapazari Metropolitan Municipality, Planning Directorate, 36 pp
9. ATC-13 (1987) Earthquake damage evaluation data for California. Applied Technology Council Report. Redwood City, California
10. ATC-21 (1988) Rapid visual screening of buildings for potential seismic hazards: A Handbook, FEMA-145. Applied Technology Council Report. Redwood City, California
11. Bilen Ö, Büyüklü AH (2006) Modelling banking sector data using decision tree algorithms and checking these algorithms. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Modelling and Simulation, vol 2. Montreal, Canada, pp 843-847
12. Bray JD, Sancio RB, Durgunoǧlu HT, Önalp A, Seed RB, Stewart JP, Youd TL, Baturay MB, Çetin KÖ, Christensen C, Karadayilar T, Emrem C (2001) Ground failure in Adapazari Turkey. Lessons learned from recent strong earthquakes. Earthquake geotechnical engineering satellite conference. XVth ICSMGE, Istanbul, pp 5-19
13. Bruneau M (2002) Building damage from the Marmara Turkey earthquake of August 17, 1999. J Seismol 6:357-377
14. Burby RJ, Deyle RE, Godschalk DR, Olshansky RB (2000) Creating hazard resilient communities through land-use planning. Nat Hazards Rev 1(2):99-106
15. Coburn A, Spence R (2002) Earthquake protection. Wiley, UK
16. Degg M (1993) The 1992 Cairo earthquake: Cause, effects and response. Disasters 17(3):227-238
17. Doǧangün A, Tuluk I, Livaoǧlu R, Acar R (2005) Traditional wooden buildings and their damages during earthquakes in Turkey. Eng Fail Anal 13:981-996
18. EERI (1985) The Morgan Hill, California, Earthquake of April 24, 1984: A reconnaissance report. Earthq Spectra 1(3):407-686
19. EERI (1986) Reducing earthquake hazards: Lessons learned from earthquakes. EERI Publication 96-02, San Francisco, California
20. EERI (1999) Learning from earthquakes; The Chi-Chi, Taiwan Earthquake of September 21, 1999. EERI Special Earthquake Report. http://www.eeri.org/ lfe/pdf/taiwan_chi_chi_eeri_preliminary_report.pdf (30/10/2007)
21. EERI (2003) Securing society against catastrophic earthquake loses. A research and outreach plan in earthquake engineering, pp 1-76. http://www.eeri.org/cds_publications/securing_society.pdf
22. Elnashai AS, Antoniou S (2000) Observation on damage of R/C structures in the northern Athens, Greece, Earthquake of September 1999. In: Elnashai AS, Antoniou S (eds) Implications of recent earthquakes on seismic risk. Series on innovation in structures and construction - vol 2. World Scientific Publishing Company
23. EQE (1989) The October 17, 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake. An EQE Summary Report. http://www.eqe.com/publications/lomaprie/lomaprie.html
24. EQE (1994) The January 17, 1994 Northridge, CA Earthquake. An EQE Summary Report. http://www.eqe.com/publications/northridge/ northridge.html
25. EQE (1995) The January 17, 1995 Kobe Earthquake. An EQE Summary Report. http://www.eqe.com/publications/kobe/kobe.html
26. Finn L (1994) Geotechnical aspects of the estimation and mitigation of earthquake risk. Issues in urban earthquake risk. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands
27. Giovinazzi S, Lagomarsino S, Pampain S (2006) Vulnerability methods and damage scenario for seismic risk analysis as support to retrofit strategies: An European perspective. NZSEE Conference. http://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/bitstream/10092/439/1/12605040_Paper14.pdf
28. Grünthal G (ed) (1998) European macroseismic scale 1998. European Seismological Commission, Council of Europe, Luxembourg
29. Han J, Kamber M (2001) Data mining concepts and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, 285 pp
30. Johnson J, Khater M, Kuzak D, Clinton R (1998) EQECAT loss modeling methodology. Earthquake insurance: Public policy perspectives from the western United States earthquake insurance summit, pp 207-219. http://www.wsspc.org/Events/1998_Summit/eqiperspectives.html
31. Kappos A, Pitilakis K, Stylianidis K, Morfidis K (1995) Cost-benefit analysis for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings in Thessalonica, based on a hybrid method of vulnerability assessment. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Seismic Zonation, vol 1, pp 406-413
32. Lin JH, Weng CC (2001) Probability analysis of seismic pounding of adjacent buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 30(10):1539-1557
33. MPWS (2003) The Ministry of Public Works and Settlement General Directorate of Disaster Affairs, Statistics of building damage
34. Olshansky RB (2001) Land use planning for seismic safety: Los Angeles county experience 1971-1994. J Am Plan As 67(2):173-184
35. Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2003) Fuzzy multicriteria model for postearthquake land-use planning. Nat Hazards Rev 4(2):59-64
36. RADIUS (1999) Risk assessment tools for diagnosis of urban areas against seismic disasters. United Nations initiative towards earthquake safe cities. http://www.geohaz.org/radius/
37. RISK-EU (2004) The European Risk-EU project: An advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios (2001-2004). http://www.Risk-EU.net
38. Roiger JR, Geatz MW (2003) Data mining, a tutorial-based primer. Addison Wesley, Boston, 150 pp
39. Rossetto T, Elnashai AS (2003) Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data. Eng Struct 25(10):1241-1263
40. Sanchez-Silva M, Garcia L (2001) Earthquake damage assessment based on fuzzy logic and neural network. Earthq Spectra 17(1):89-112
41. Sarin RK (2001) A social decision analysis of the earthquake safety problem: The case of existing Los Angeles buildings. In: Kleindorf PR, Sertel MR (eds) Mitigation and financing of seismic risks: Turkish and international perspectives. Kluwer, Netherlands, pp 129-157
42. Singhal A, Kiremidjian AS (1996) Method for probabilistic evaluation of seismic structural damage. J Struct Eng 122(12):1458-1468
43. Spence R (2000) Recent earthquake damage in Europe and implications for loss estimation methodologies, implications of recent Earthquakes on seismic risk. In: Elnashai AS, Antoniou S (eds) Implications of recent earthquakes on seismic risk. Series on innovation in structures and construction - vol 2. World Scientific Publishing Company, pp 77-89
44. Sucuoǧlu H (1996) The earthquake behaviours of masonry buildings in Turkey. In: Proceedings of TUBITAK Earthquake Symposium, pp 185-190
45. Şengezer B (1999) Damage analysis of Erzincan earthquake March 13, 1992 and the problem of earthquakes in Turkey. Yildiz Technical University Publication, Istanbul (in Turkish)
46. Şengezer B, Ansal A (2007) Probabilistic evaluation of observed earthquake damage data in Turkey. Nat Hazards 40(2):305-326
47. Şengezer B, Koç E (2005) A critical analysis of earthquakes and urban planning in Turkey. Disasters 29(2):171-194
48. Şengezer B, Özkaraman M (1996) City planning and construction stages for the mitigation of earthquake effects. In: Proceedings of TUBITAK Earthquake Symposium, Ankara, pp 353-362 (in Turkish)
49. Tomaževič M (2000) Seismic redesign of existing stone-masonry buildings. Eur Earthq Eng 14(3):59-66
50. TS 4377 Turkish standard for fabricated bricks with vertical holes for wall construction. Institute of Turkish Standards, Ankara (in Turkish)
51. USGS United States Geological Survey (1999) Implication for earthquake risk reduction in United States from the Kocaeli Turkey Earthquake of August 17, 1999. US Geological Circular 1193. United States Government Printing Office, Central Region, Denver, CO
52. Whitman VR, Anagnos T, Kircher CA, Lawson RS (1997) Development of a national earthquake loss estimation methodology. Earthq Spectra 13(4):643-661
53. Yegian K, Ghahraman G (1992) The Armenia Earthquake of December 1988. Engineering and reconstruction aspects. Department of Civil Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, Report No. CE-92-11