Psychologist qualifications in Europe: Common standard for quality and mobility

Australian Psychologist

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 222-230

  Lunt, Ingrid ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Mobility; Psychologist practice; Qualifications; Standards

Indexed keywords

EID: 54949117977     PISSN: 00050067     EISSN: 17429544     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00050060802488026     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Barblan, A. (2002). Academic cooperation and mobility in Europe: How it was and how it will be. Higher Education in Europe, 27, 31-58.
2. Bartram, D. (1996). Occupational standards and competence-based qualifications for professional applied psychologists in the U.K. European Psychologist, 1, 157-165.
3. Bartram, D. (2000). Higher education and the delivery of standards-based qualifications. Unpublished manuscript.
4. Bartram, D., & Roe, R. (2005). Definition and assessment of competences in the context of the European Diploma in psychology. European Psychologist, 10, 93-102.
5. British Psychological Society (BPS) Consultative Working Group for Occupational Standards in Applied Psychology (1998). National occupational standards in applied psychology. Leicester: British Psychological Society.
6. Donn, J., Routh, D., & Lunt, I. (2000). From Leipzig to Luxembourg (via Boulder and Vail): History of clinical psychology training in Europe and the United States. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 423-428.
7. European Federation of Professional Psychologists Associations (EFPPA) (1990). Optimal standards for the professional training in psychology. Booklet No. 3. Brussels: Author.
8. The European Network of Work and Organisational Psychologists (ENOP) (1998). European curriculum in work and organizational psychology. Reference model and minimal standards. Paris: ENOP/Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.
9. Gauthier, J. (2002). Facilitating mobility for psychologists through a competency-based approach for regulation and accreditation: The Canadian experiment. European Psychologist, 7, 203-212.
10. Hall, J., & Lunt, I. (2005). Global mobility for psychologists: The role of psychology organisations in the USA, Canada and Europe. American Psychologist, 60, 712-726.
11. Jern, S., Odland, T., & Nieminen, P. (2002). The equivalence framework in relationship to the basic training of psychologists and the specialisation training: The Nordic scene. European Psychologist, 7, 213-220.
12. Lunt, I. (1998). Psychology in Europe: Challenges and opportunities. European Psychologist, 3, 93-101.
13. Lunt, I. (2002). A common framework for the training of psychologists in Europe. European Psychologist, 7, 180-191.
14. Lunt, I. (2005). The impact of the "Bologna Process" on the development of a European qualification in psychology. European Psychologist, 10, 2, 86-92.
15. Lunt, I. (2008). Professional mobility and quality assurance within the European Union. In J. Hall, & E. Altmaier (Eds.), Global promise. Quality assurance and accountability in professional psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Lunt, I., Bartram, D., Georgas, J., Jern, S., Job, R., Lecuyer, R., et al. (2001). A European framework for psychologists training (Final report submitted to the European Union of the Leonardo da Vinci funded project EuroPsyT).
17. Newstead, S., & Makinen, S. (1997). Psychology teaching in Europe. European Psychologist, 2, 3-10.
18. Peiro, J. M., & Lunt, I. (2002). The context for a European framework for psychologists' training. European Psychologist, 7, 169-179.
19. Roe, R. A. (2002). What makes a competent psychologist? European Psychologist, 7, 192-203.
20. Sorbonne Declaration (1998). Joint Declaration on harmonisation of the architecture of the European Higher Education systems by the four ministers in charge from France, Germany, Italy, and United Kingdom, Paris, the Sorbonne, 25 May 1998. Retrieved from http://www.bologna-berlin2003.de/pdf/ Sorbonne_declaration.pdf.