Hydrodynamic comparison of biological prostheses during progressive valve calcification in a simulated exercise situation. An in vitro study

European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 960-963

  Bakhtiary, Farhad ^a   Dzemali, Omer ^a   Steinseiffer, Ulrich ^b   Schmitz, Christof ^b   Glasmacher, Birgit ^c   Moritz, Anton ^a   Kleine, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FRANKFURT   (Germany)

^b Helmholtz Institute   (Germany)

^c LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aortic valve bioprosthesis; Hemodynamics; Valve durability

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM; CORTICOTROPIN;

ANIMAL TISSUE; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; ARTICLE; BIOPROSTHESIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXERCISE; HEART VALVE CALCIFICATION; HYDRODYNAMICS; IN VITRO STUDY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SIMULATION; VALVULAR HEART DISEASE;

ANIMALS; AORTIC VALVE; BIOMECHANICS; BIOPROSTHESIS; CALCINOSIS; CARDIOMYOPATHIES; DISEASE PROGRESSION; EXERCISE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SWINE;

EID: 54949105372     PISSN: 10107940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.05.060     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Borger M.A., Ivanov J., Armstrong S., Christie-Hrybinsky D., Feindel C.M., and David T.E. Twenty-year results of the Hancock II bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis 15 1 (2006) 49-56
2. Gao G., Wu Y., Grunkemeier G.L., Furnary A.P., and Starr A. Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves. J Am Coll Cardiol 44 2 (2004) 384-388
3. Mako W.J., and Vesely I. In vivo and in vitro models of calcification in porcine aortic valve cusps. J Heart Valve Dis 6 3 (1997) 316-323
4. Friedewald V.E., Bonow R.O., Borer J.S., Carabello B.A., Kleine P.P., Akins C.W., and Roberts W.C. The Editor's Roundtable: cardiac valve surgery. Am J Cardiol 1 99 (2007) 1269-1278
5. Glasmacher B., Reul H., Schneppershoff S., Schreck S., and Rau G. In vitro calcification of pericardial bioprostheses. J Heart Valve Dis 7 4 (1998) 415-418
6. Reul H. Cardiovascular simulation models. Life Support Syst 2 2 (1984) 77-97
7. Botzenhardt F., Gansera B., and Kemkes B.M. Mid-term hemodynamic and clinical results of the stented porcine Medtronic Mosaic valve in aortic position. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 52 1 (2004) 34-41
8. Riess F.C., Bader R., Cramer E., Hansen L., Kleijnen B., Wahl G., Wallrath J., Winkel S., and Bleese N. Hemodynamic performance of the Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis up to ten years. Ann Thorac Surg 83 4 (2007) 1310-1318
9. Banbury M.K., Cosgrove III D.M., Thomas J.D., Blackstone E.H., Rajeswaran J., Okies J.E., and Frater R.M. Hemodynamic stability during 17 years of the Carpentier-Edwards aortic pericardial bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 73 5 (2002) 1460-1465
10. Dellgren G., David T.E., Raanani E., Armstrong S., Ivanov J., and Rakowski H. Late hemodynamic and clinical outcomes of aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 124 1 (2002) 146-154
11. Glasmacher B., Deiwick M., Reul H., Knesch H., Keus D., and Rau G. A new in vitro test of for calcification of bioprosthetic valves. Int J Artif Organs 20 5 (1997) 267-271
12. Seitelberger R., Bialy J., Gottardi R., Seebacher G., Moidl R., Mittelböck M., Simon P., and Wolner E. Relation between size of prosthesis and valve gradient: comparison of two aortic bioprosthesis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 25 (2004) 358-363
13. Eichinger W.B., Botzenhardt F., Guenzinger R., Bleiziffer S., Keithahn A., Bauernschmitt R., and Lange R. The effective orifice area/patient aortic annulus area ratio: a better way to compare different bioprostheses? A prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount bioprostheses in the aortic position. J Heart Valve Dis 13 3 (2004) 382-388
14. Kuehnel R.U., Pohl A., Puchner R., Wendt M.O., Hartrumpf M., Pohl M., and Albes J.M. Opening and closure characteristics of different types of stented biological valves. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 54 (2006) 85-90
15. Dalmau M.J., Gonzalez-Santos J.M., Lopez-Rodriguez J., Bueno M., Arribas A., and Nieto F. One-year hemodynamic performance of Perimount Magna pericardial xenograft and the Medtronic Mosaic bioprosthesis in the aortic position: a prospective randomized study. Interact Cardio Vasc Thorac Surg 6 (2007) 345-349
16. Lansac E., Lim H.S., Shomura Y., Lim K.H., Rice N.T., Goetz W., Acar C., and Duran C.M. A four dimensional study of the aortic root dynamics. Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg 22 (2002) 497-503
17. Seitelberger R., Bialy J., Gottardi R., Seebacher G., Moidl R., Mittelböck M., Simon P., and Wolner E. Relation between size of prosthesis and valve gradient: comparison of two aortic valve bioprosthesis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 25 3 (2004) 358-363
18. Tornos M.P., Olona M., Permanyer-Miralda G., Evangelista A., Candell J., Padilla F., and Soler Soler J. Heart failure after aortic valve replacement for aortic regurgitation: prospective 20-year study. Am Heart J 136 Oct (4 Pt 1) (1998) 681-687
19. Mistiaen W.P., Van Cauwelaert P., Muylaert P., Wuyts F., and Bortier H. Risk factors for congestive heart failure after aortic valve replacement with a Carpentier-Edwards pericardial prosthesis in the elderly. J Heart Valve Dis 14 6 (2005) 774-779
20. Bonow R.O., Lakatos E., Maron B.J., and Epstein S.E. Serial long-term assessment of the natural history of asymptomatic patients with chronic aortic regurgitation and normal left ventricular systolic function. Circulation 84 (1991) 1625-1635
21. Bakhtiary F., Schiemann M., Dzemali O., Dogan S., Schächinger V., Ackermann H., Moritz A., and Kleine P. Impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch and aortic valve design on coronary flow reserve after aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 49 (2007) 790-796
22. Bakhtiary F., Dzemali O., Steinseiffer U., Schmitz C., Glasmacher B., Moritz A., and Kleine P. Opening and closing kinematics of fresh and calcified aortic valve prostheses: an in vitro study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 134 (2007) 657-662