Prediction of solubility of nonionic solutes in anionic micelle (SDS) using a QSPR model

QSAR and Combinatorial Science

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 338-346

  Ghasemi, Jahanbakhsh ^a   Abdolmaleki, Azizeh ^a   Asadpour, Saeid ^a   Shiri, Fereshteh ^a  

^a RAZI UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Anionic surfactant; Micelle; MLR and PLS; Molecular descriptors; QSPR; Solubility

Indexed keywords

ANIONIC SURFACTANTS; FORECASTING; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; MICELLES; SOLUBILITY;

ANIONIC MICELLES; LEAST SQUARE REGRESSION METHOD; MOLECULAR DESCRIPTORS; MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION AND PARTIAL LEAST SQUARE; MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSIONS; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARE REGRESSION; PARTIAL LEAST-SQUARES; PARTIAL LEAST-SQUARES METHOD; QSPR; QSPR MODEL;

MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION;

ALCOHOL; ALDEHYDE; ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBON; AMINE; ANIONIC SURFACTANT; AROMATIC HYDROCARBON; BENZONITRILE; BENZOPHENONE; BENZYL ALCOHOL; CARBOXYLIC ACID; CYCLOHEXANE; HALOCARBON; HALOTHANE; HEPTANOL; HEXANOL; ISOPENTYL ALCOHOL; KETONE; META CRESOL; METHYL IODIDE; NAPHTHOL DERIVATIVE; OCTANOL; ORTHO CRESOL; PHENOL; PROPANE;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMPUTER PREDICTION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; MEASUREMENT ERROR; MICELLE; MOLECULAR ELECTRONICS; MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES REGRESSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; SOLUBILITY; SOLUTE; STATISTICAL MODEL; THERMODYNAMICS; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 54949103182     PISSN: 1611020X     EISSN: 16110218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qsar.200730022     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. A. Stoyanova, A. Alexiev, Surfactants and kinetic determinations of microelements. Trakia J. Sci. 2005, 3, 1-9.
2. R. Codony, M. D. Prat, J. L. Beltra'n, Study on partition equilibria of metal complexes in non-ionic micellar solutions from spectrophotometric data. Talanta 2000, 52, 225-232.
3. E. Pramauro, A. Bianco Prevot, Solubilization in micellar systems. Analytical and environmental applications. Pure Appl. Chem. 1995, 67, 551-559.
4. F. H. Quina, E. Q. Alonso, J. P. S Farah, Incorporation of nonionic solutes into aqueous micelles: A linear solvation free energy relationship analysis. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 11708-11714.
5. D. K. Taylor, R. Carbonell, J. M. DeSimone, Opportunities for pollution prevention and energy efficiency enabled by the carbon dioxide technology platform. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 2000, 25, 115-46.
6. J. F. Brennecke, M. A. Stadtherr, A course in environmentally conscious chemical process engineering. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2002, 26, 307-318.
7. S. P. Beaudoin, C. S. Grant, R. G. Carbonell, Removal of organic films from solid surfaces using aqueous solutions of nonionic surfactants. 1. Experiments. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1995, 34, 3307-3317.
8. M. J. Rosen, Surfactant and Interfacial Phenomena, 3rd edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York (USA), pp. 107, 2004.
9. S. Shahmirani, E. Vasheghani Farahani, J. Ghasemi, Development of a model to predict partition coefficient of organic pollutants in cloud point extraction process. Anal. di Chim. 2006, 96, 327-338.
10. M. H. Abraham, H. S. Chdha, J. P. Dixon, C. Rafols, C. Treiner. Hydrogen bonding. Part 40. Factors that influence the distribution of solutes between water and sodium dodecylsulfate micelles. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1995, 2, 887-894.
11. C. O. Rangel-Yagui, A. Pessoa-Jr, L. C. Tavares, Micellar solubilization of drugs. J. Pharm. Sci. 2005, 8, 147-163.
12. C. Hansch, T. Fujita, ρ-α-π Analysis. A method for the correlation of biological activity and chemical structure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 1616.
13. C. Hansch, A quantitative approach to biochemical structure-activity relationships. Acct. Chem. Res. 1969, 2, 232-239.
14. W. J. Dunn, III, S. Wold, Use of chemometrics in environmental toxicology and structure-activity relationships. Trends Analyt Chem. 1986, 5, 53.
15. W. J. Dunn III, Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1989, 6, 181.
16. L. Carlsen, P. B. Sørensen, M. Thomsen, Partial order ranking-based QSAR'S: Estimation of solubilities and octanol-water partitioning. Chemosphere. 2001, 43, 295-302.
17. P. V. Khadikar, D. Mandloi, A. V. Bajajc, Sh. Joshic, QSAR study on solubility of alkanes in water and their partition coefficients in different solvent systems using PI index. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 419-422.
18. G. Choudhary, C. Karthikeyan, N. S. Hari Narayana Moorthy, S. K. Sharma, P. Trivedi, QSAR analysis of some cytotoxic thiadiazinoacridines. Int. Elec. J. Mol. Des. 2005, 4, 793-802.
19. D. H. Cho, S. K. Lee, B. T. Kim, K. T. No, Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) study of new fluorovinyloxyacetamides. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2001, 22. 388-394.
20. A. Tropsha, P. Gramatica, V. K. Gombar, The importance of being earnest: Validation is the absolute essential for successful application and interpretation of QSPR models. QSAR Comb. Sci. 2003, 22, 69-76.
21. L. Eriksson, E. Johansson, M. Müller, S. Wold, On the selection of the training set in environmental QSAR analysis when compounds are clustered. J. Chemom. 2000, 14, 599-616.
22. A. Golbraikh, M. Shen, Z. Xiao, Y. D. Xiao, K. H. Lee, A. Tropsha, Rational selection of training sets for the development of validated QSAR models. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2003, 17, 241-253.
23. P. Gramatica, P. Pilutti, E. Papa, Validated QSAR prediction of OH tropospheric degradation of VOCs: Splitting into training-test sets and consensus modeling. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 1794-1802.
24. R. Gozalbes, J. P. Doucet, F. Derouin, Application of topological descriptors in QSAR and drug design: History and new trends. Curr. Drug Target 2002, 2, 93-102.
25. A. Rouhollahi, J. Ghasemi, H. Shafieyan Bedshahi, QSPR of Some Fatty Dicarboxylic and Amino Acids with Retention Times in a Gas Chromatography by GAPLS and ANN, M.Sc. Thesis, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran 2006.
26. L. Eriksson, E, Johansson, Tutorial multivariate design and modeling in QSAR. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1996, 34, 1-19.
27. M. Jalali-Heravi, F. Konuze, Use of quantitative structure-property relationships in predicting the Kraft point of anionic surfactants. Int. Elec. J. Mol. Des. 2002, 1, 410-417.
28. C. D. Selassie, (Ed.), D. J. Abraham, Burger's Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery, Volume 1: Drug Discovery, 6th edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (USA) 2003.
29. C. Hansch, T. Klein, Use of quantitative structure-property relationships in predicting the Kraft point of anionic surfactants. Ace. Chem. Res. 1986, 19, 392.
30. D. W. Roberts, Application of octanol/water partition coefficients in surfactant science: A quantitative structure-property relationship for micellization of anionic surfactants. Langmuir 2002, 18, 345-352.
31. oct from structures, Chem. Rev. 1993, 93 1281-1306.
32. A. R. Katritzky, V. S. Lobanov, M. Karelson QSPR: The correlation and quantitative prediction of chemical and physical properties from structure. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1995, 24, 279-287.
33. M. Shahid Khan, Z. H. Khan, Molecular modeling for generation of structural and molecular electronic descriptors for QSAR using quantum mechanical semiemprical and ab initio methods. Gen. Inf. 2003, 14, 486-487.
34. W. Caetano, E. L. Gelamo, M. Tabak, R. Itri, Chlorpromazine and sodium dodecyl sulphate mixed micelles investigated by small angle X-ray scattering. J. Coll. Int. Sci. 2002, 248, 149-157.
35. J. Campos, M. C. Núñez, V. Rodríguez, A. Entrena, R. Hernández-Alcoceba, F. Fernández, J. C. Lacal, M. A. Gallo, A. Espinosa, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 36, 215-225.