Marine invertebrate taxonomy: Needs in Latin America;Taxonomá de invertebrados marinos: Necesidades en LatinoAmérica

Interciencia

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 510-517

  Vallejo, Sergio I Salazar ^a   González, Norma Emilia ^b   Schwindt, Evangelina ^c  

^a EL COLEGIO DE LA FRONTERA SUR   (Mexico)

^b Chetumal Quintana Roo ^*  (Mexico)

^c CENTRO NACIONAL PATAGÓNICO   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INVERTEBRATA;

EID: 54849440783     PISSN: 03781844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Agnarsson 1, Kuntner M (2007) Taxonomy in a changing world: Searching solutions for a science in crisis. Syst. Biol. 56: 531-539.
2. Agosti D (2003) Encyclopedia of life: should species descriptions equal gene sequence? TREE 18: 273.
3. Almanaque Mundial (2008). Televisa. México. 715 pp.
4. Amin M, Mabe M (2000) Impact factors: use and abuse. Persp. Publ. 1: 1-6 Reproducido en. Medicina (Buenos Aires) 2005 63: 347-354.
5. AMSA (2005) Marine Taxonomy in the New Millenium. Bull. AMSA 169: 22-27.
6. Basset Y, Novotny V, Miller SE, Weiblen GD, Missa O, Stewart AJA (2004) Conservation and biological monitoring of tropical forests: the role of parataxonomists. J. Appl. Ecol. 41: 163-174.
7. Bastida Zavala JR, Carrera Parra LF, Salazar-Vallejo SI (2000) Paradojas de la taxonomía. En Lunes en la Ciencia, La Jornada (28/02/2000). UNAM. México, (www.jornada.unam.mx/2000/02/28/cien-paradojas.html)
8. Bhadury P, Austen MC, Milton DT, Lambshead PJD, Rogers AD, Smerdon GR (2006) Development and evaluation of a DNA barcoding approach for the rapid identification of nematods. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 320: 1-9.
9. Blaxter ML (2004) The promise of a DNA taxonomy. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 359: 669-679.
10. Boero F (2001) Light after dark: the partnership for enhancing expertise in taxonomy. TREE 16: 266.
11. Bortolus A (2008) Error cascades in the biological sciences: The unwanted consequences of using bad Taxonomy in Ecology. Ambio 37: 114-118.
12. Bouchard RW, Huggins D, Kriz J (2005) A review of the issues related to taxonomic resolution in biological monitoring of aquatic ecosystems with emphasis on macroinvertebrates. Kansas Biological Survey Technical Report 133. Lawrence, KS, EEUU. 38 pp.
13. Brower A (2006) Problems with DNA for species delimitations: ten species of Astraptes fulgerator reassessed (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). Syst. Biodiv. 4: 127-132.
14. Campos-Vázquez C, Carrera-Parra LF, González NE, Salazar-Vallejo SI (1999) Criptofauna en rocas de Punta Nizuc, Caribe mexicano y su utilidad como biomonitor potential. Rev. Biol. Trop. 47: 799-808.
15. Conabio (2005) Conabio 1992-2004. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad. México. 53 pp.
16. Conference of the Parties (2006) Global Taxonomy Initiative: In-depth review of the implementation of the programme of work for the Global Taxonomy Initiative. (www.biodiv.org/decisions/default.aspx?m=COP-08&id= 11015&lg=0).
17. Davenport TRB, Stanley WT, Sargis EJ, de Luca DW, Mpunga NE, Machaga SJ, Olson LE (2006) ScienceExpress (11/05/2006). 8 pp.
18. De Carvalho MR, Bockmann FA, Amorim DS, de Vivo M, de Toledo-Piza M, Menezes NA, de Figueiredo JL, Castro RMC, Gill AC, McEachran JD, Compagno LJV, Schelly RC, Britz R, Lundberg JG, Vari RP, Nelson G (2005) Revisiting the taxonomic impediment. Science 307: 353.
19. De Salle R, Egan MG, Siddall M (2005) The unholy trinity: taxonomy, species delimitation and DNA barcoding. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 360: 1905-1916.
20. Dunn CD (2003) Keeping taxonomy based on morphology. TREE 18: 270-271.
21. Ebach MC, Holdrege C (2005) More taxonomy, not DNA barcoding. BioScience 55: 822-823.
22. Environment Australia (1998) Global Taxonomy Initiative. The Darwin Declaration. Australian Biological Resources Study. Canberra, Australia. (www.biodiv.org/programmes/crosscutting/taxonomy/darwin-declaration.asp)
23. Frank M (2003) Impact factors: arbiter of excellence? J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 91: 4-6.
24. Gaston KJ, O'Neill MA (2004) Automated species identification: why not? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 359: 655-667.
25. Giangrande A (2003) Biodiverstiy, conservation, and the 'Taxonomic impediment'. Aquat. Cons. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 13: 451-459.
26. Goldstein PZ (2004) Systematic collection in North American invertebrate conservation and monitoring programmes. J. Appl. Ecol. 41: 175-180.
27. Gotelli NJ (2004) A taxonomic wish-list for community ecology. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 359: 585-597.
28. GrantDoctor (2004) Taxonomy of a training program. ScienceCareers (10/09/2004) (http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_development/ previous_issues/articles/3220/the_grantdoctor_taxonomy_of_a_training_program).
29. Greuter W (2004) Recent developments in International Biological Nomenclature. Turk. J. Bot. 28: 17-26.
30. Guzmán-Alvis AI, Carrasco F (2005) Taxonomic aggregation and redundancy in a tropical macroinfaunal assemblage of the southern Caribbean in the detection of temporal patterns. Sci. Mar. 69: 133-141.
31. Haas F, Háuser CL (2006) How many taxonomists are there? (www.gti-kontaktstelle.de/taxonomy_E.html)
32. Harris R (2005) Attacks on taxonomy: A contentious biological classification system may make cataloging biodiversity tricky. Am. Scient. 93: 311-312.
33. Hopkins GW, Freckleton RP (2002) Declines in the numbers of amateur and professional taxonomists: implications for conservation. Anim. Cons. 5: 245-249.
34. Janzen DH (2004) Setting up tropical biodiversity for conservation through non-damaging use: participation by parataxonomists. J. Appl. Ecol. 41: 181-187.
35. Keller RA, Boyd RN, Wheeler QD (2003) The illogical basis of phylogenetic nomenclature. Bot. Rev. 69: 93-110.
36. Kim KC, Byrne LB (2006) Biodiversity loss and the taxonomic bottleneck: emerging biodiversity science. Ecol. Res. 21: 794-810.
37. King DA (2004) The scientific impact of nations. Nature 430: 311-316.
38. Lipscomb D, Platnick N, Wheeler Q (2003) The intellectual content of taxonomy: a comment on DNA taxonomy. TREE 18: 65-66.
39. Mace GM (2004) The role of taxonomy in species conservation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 359: 711-719.
40. Vlarinoni L, Magalhães C, Marques AC (2006) Propostas de estratégias para a consolidacão das coleções zoológicas brasileiras. (www.cria.org.br/cgee/documentos/docgeralzool. doc)
41. Marques AC, Lamas CJE (2005) Sistemática zoológica no Brasil: estado da arte, expectativas e sugestoes de ações futuras. (www.cria.org. br/cgee/junho/docs/EstadoArteZoologia.pdf)
42. Mlaurer D (2000) The dark side of taxonomic sufficiency (TS). Mar. Poll. Bull. 40: 98-101.
43. May RM (1999) Unanswered questions in ecology. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 354: 1951-1959.
44. Way RM (2004) Tomorrow's taxonomy: collecting new species in the field will remain the ratelimiting step. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 359: 733-734.
45. Vleyer CP, Paulay G (2005) DNA Barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biology 3: e422.
46. Narayanaswamy BE, Nickell TD, Gage JD (2003) Appropriate levels of taxonomic discrimination in deep-sea studies: species vs family. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 257: 59-68.
47. Page L, Funk D, Jeffords M, Lipscomb D, Mares M, Prather A (2004) Workshp to produce a decadal vision for taxonomy and natural history collections. USNSF. Gainsville, FL, EEUU. (www.malacological.org/pdfs/fltaxwkshp.pdf)
48. Por FD (2007) A "taxonomic affidavit": Why is it needed. Integr. Zool. 2: 57-59.
49. Quieke D (2004) The world of DNA barcoding and morphology - collision or synergism and what of the future? Systematist 23: 8-12.
50. Quijon PA, Snelgrove PVR (2006) The use of coarser taxonomic resolution in studies of predation on marine sedimentary fauna. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 330: 159-168.
51. Raven PH (2004) Taxonomy: Where are we now? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 359: 729-730.
52. Rieppel O (2006) The PhyloCode: a critical discussion of its theoretical foundation. Cladistics 22: 186-197.
53. Roach AC, Jones AR, Murray A (2001) Using benthic recruitment to assess the significance of contaminated sediments: the influence of taxonomic resolution. Em. Poll. 112: 131-143.
54. Roy K, Jablonski D, Valentine JW (1996) Higher taxa in biodiversity studies: patterns from eastern Pacific marine molluscs. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 351: 1605-1613.
55. Salazar-Vallejo SI (1991) Contaminatión Marina: Métodos de Evaluatión Biológica. Ciqro. Gobierno de Quintana Roo. Chetumal, México. 190 pp.
56. Salazar-Vallejo SI (2001) Plan sexenal para la ciencia. En Lunes en la Ciencia. La Jornada (02/04/2001) UNAM, México.
57. Salazar-Vallejo SI, Carrera-Parra LF (1998) Taxonomía biológica, factor de impacto y evaluación curricular para el siglo XXI. Interciencia 23: 1-7.
58. Salazar-Vallejo SI, González NE (1993) Panorama y fundamentos para un programa nacional. En Salazar-Vallejo SI, González NE (Eds.) Biodiversidad Marina y Costera de México. Conabio/Ciqro. México, pp. 6-38.
59. Salazar-Vallejo SI, Escobar-Briones E, González NE, Suárez-Morales E, Álvarez E, de León-González JA, Hendrickx ME (2007) Iniciativa mexicana en taxonomía: biota marina y costera. Ciencia Mar 11: 69-77.
60. Samper C (2004) Taxonomy and environmental policy. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 359: 721-728.
61. Savolainen V, Cowan RS, Vogler AP, Roderick GK, Lane R (2005) Towards writing the encyclopaedia of life: an introduction to DNA barcoding. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 360: 1805-1811.
62. SBSTTA (2003) Draft Guide to the Global Taxonomy Initiative. Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice. UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA 91. 93 pp.
63. Scoble MJ (2004) Unitary or unified taxonomy? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 359: 699-710.
64. Seberg O (2004) The future of Systematics: assembling the tree of life. Systematist 23: 2-8.
65. Smith VS (2006) Twenty-first century taxonomy: perspectives on taxonomy's industrial age. (http://Darwin.zoology.gla.ac.uk/~vsmith/)
66. Soberón J, Peterson AT (2004) Biodiversity informatics: managing and applying primary biodiversity data. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 359: 689-698.
67. Tarazona J, Gutiérrez D, Paredes C, Indacochea A (2003) Overview and challenges of marine biodiversity research in Peru. Gayana 67: 206-231.
68. Taylor A (2004) Taxonomy in support of biodiversity conservation - negotiating the acronym jungle. Syst. Biodiv. 2: 111-112.
69. Toledo A (1998) Economia de la Biodiversidad. PNUMA. México. 273 pp.
70. Watson RT (2005) Turning science into policy: challenges and experiences from the sciencepolicy interface. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 360: 471-477.
71. Werner YL (2006) The case of impact factors versus Taxonomy: A proposal. J. Nat. Hist. 40: 1285-1286.
72. Wheeler QD (2004) Taxonomic triage and the poverty of phylogeny. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 359: 571-583.
73. Wheeler QD, Raven PH, Wilson EO (2004) Taxonomy: Impediment or Expedient? Science 303: 285.
74. Wilson EO (2004) Taxonomy as a fundamental discipline. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 359: 739.
75. Wilson EO (2005) Systematics and the future of biology. PNAS 102 (Suppl. 1): 6520-6521.
76. Winston JE (1992) Systematics and marine conservation. En Eldredge N (Ed.) Systematics, Ecology, and the Biodiversity Crisis. Columbia University Press. New York, EEUU. pp 144-168.
77. Włodarska-Kowalczuk M, K dra M (2007) Surrogacy in natural pattern of benthic distribution and diversity: Selected taxa versus lower taxonomic resolution. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 351: 53-63.