Occlusal indexes as judged by subjective opinions

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 134, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 671-675

  Arruda, Airton O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; DENTAL CARE; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HISTOLOGY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHODONTICS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARD; TOOTH ARCH; TOOTH OCCLUSION;

ADULT; AGED; DENTAL ARCH; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL OCCLUSION; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE, DENTAL; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 54849406764     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.09.058     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Salzmann J.A. Handicapping malocclusion assessment to establish treatment priority. Am J Orthod 54 (1968) 749-765
2. Draker H.L. Handicapping labio-lingual deviations: a proposed index for public health purposes. Am J Orthod 46 (1960) 295-305
3. Grainger R.M. Orthodontic treatment priority index (1967), US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
4. Summers C.J. The occlusal index: a system for identifying and scoring occlusal disorders. Am J Orthod 59 (1971) 552-567
5. Daniels C.P., and Richmond S. The development of the index of complexity, outcome and need (ICON). J Orthod 27 (2000) 149-162
6. Otuyemi O.D., and Jones S.P. Methods of assessing and grading malocclusion: a review. Aust Orthod J 14 (1995) 21-27
7. Shaw W.C., Richmond S., and O'Brien K.D. The use of occlusal indices: a European perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 107 (1995) 1-10
8. Shaw W.C., O'Brien K.D., and Richmond S. Quality control in orthodontics: factors influencing the receipt of orthodontic treatment. Br Dent J 170 (1991) 66-68
9. Richmond S., Shaw W.C., O'Brien K.D., Buchanan I.B., Jones R., Stephens C.D., et al. The development of the PAR index (peer assessment rating): reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 14 (1992) 125-139
10. Richmond S., and Daniels C.P. International comparisons of professional perceptions in orthodontics: part 1-treatment need. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113 (1998) 180-185
11. Younis J.W., Vig K.W.L., Rinchuse D.J., and Weyant R.J. A validation study of three indexes of orthodontic treatment need in the United States. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 25 (1997) 358-362
12. Summers C.J. Tests of validity of indices of occlusion. Am J Orthod 62 (1972) 428-429
13. DeGuzman L., Bahiraei D., Vig K.W., Vig P.S., Weyant R.J., and O'Brien K.D. The validation of the peer assessment rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 107 (1995) 172-176
14. Straffon D. The American Board of Orthodontics grading system: a validation against contemporary orthodontic opinion [thesis] (2001), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
15. Rowe K.G.T. The concordance of pre-treatment malocclusion assessment among orthodontic specialty practitioners [thesis] (1989), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
16. Massler M., and Frankel J.M. Prevalence of malocclusion in children aged 14 to 18 years. Am J Orthod 37 (1951) 751-768
17. Cons N.C., Jenny J., and Kohout F.J. DAI: the dental aesthetic index (1986), University of Iowa Press, Iowa City
18. Richmond S., Shaw W.C., O'Brien K.D., Buchanan I.B., Stephens C.D., Andrews M., et al. The relationship between the index of orthodontic treatment need and consensus opinion of a panel of 74 dentists. Br Dent J 178 (1995) 370-374
19. Prahl-Andersen B. The need for orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 48 (1978) 1-9
20. Prahl-Anderson B., Boersma B., van der Linden H., and Moore A.W. Perceptions of dentofacial morphology by laypersons, general dentists and orthodontists. J Am Dent Assoc 98 (1979) 209-212
21. Shaw W.C., Addy M., and Ray C. Dental and social effects of malocclusion and effectiveness of orthodontic treatment: a review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 8 (1980) 36-45
22. Yeh M.S., Koochek A.R., Vlaskalic V., Boyd R., and Richmond S. The relationship of 2 professional occlusal indexes with patients' perceptions of aesthetics, function, speech, and orthodontic treatment need. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 118 (2000) 421-428
23. Brook P.H., and Shaw W.C. The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod 11 (1989) 309-320
24. Buchanan I.B., Shaw W.C., Richmond S., O'Brien K.D., and Andrews M. A comparison of the reliability and validity of the PAR index and Summers' occlusal index. Eur J Orthod 15 (1993) 27-31
25. So L.L., and Tang E.L. A comparative study using the occlusal index and the index of orthodontic treatment need. Angle Orthod 63 (1993) 57-64
26. Tang E.L., and So L.L. Correlation of orthodontic treatment demand with treatment need assessed using two indices. Angle Orthod 65 (1995) 443-450
27. McGorray S.P., Wheeler T.T., Keeling S.D., Yurkiewicz L., Taylor M.G., and King G.J. Evaluation of orthodontists' perception of treatment need and the peer assessment rating (PAR) index. Angle Orthod 69 (1999) 325-333
28. Koocheck A.R., Yeh M.S., Rolfe B., and Richmond S. The relationship between index of complexity, outcome and need, and patients' perception of malocclusion: a study in general dental practice. Br Dent J 191 (2001) 325-329
29. Hunt O., Hepper P., Johnston C., Stevenson M., and Burden D. The aesthetic component of the index of orthodontic treatment need validated against lay opinion. Eur J Orthod 24 (2002) 53-59
30. Fox N.A., Daniels C., and Gilgrass T. A comparison of the index of complexity, outome and need (ICON) with the peer assessment rating (PAR) and the index of orthodontic treatment need (IOTN). Br Dent J 193 (2002) 225-230
31. Beyer W.H. Handbook of tables for probabilities and statistics (1968), CRC Press, Cleveland
32. Stephenson W. The study of behavior (1953), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
33. Cox N.H., and van der Linden F.P. Facial harmony. Am J Orthod 60 (1971) 175-183
34. Skinner B.A. Treatment need: a comparison of personal and professional judgments [thesis] (2000), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
35. VanLandschoot T.W. Orthognathic surgery: patient values and professional judgments [thesis] (2004), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
36. Johnson J.L. Validity of the difficulty index as presented at the Tweed study course in determining orthodontic treatment difficulty [thesis] (2005), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
37. Gupta M.I. The costs and benefits of orthodontic treatment: patients' values compared to professional judgments [thesis] (2003), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
38. Mendenhall W., Beaver R.J., and Beaver B.M. Introduction to probability and statistics (1999), Brooks/Cole Publishing Co, Pacific Grove, Calif
39. Blalock Jr. H.M. Social statistics (1960), McGraw-Hill, New York
40. American Association of Orthodontists. A smile that's good for life. Why straighten teeth?. www.braces.org/beatifulsmile/straighten/index