The development, predation, and reproduction of Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Hatay Fed Tetranychus cinnabarinus Boisduval (Acari: Tetranychidae) larvae and protonymphs at different temperatures

Turkish Journal of Zoology

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 407-413

  Kazak, Cengiz ^a  

^a CUKUROVA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Development; Food consumption; Phytoseiulus persimilis; Temperature; Tetranychus cinnabarinus

Indexed keywords

EID: 54749120482     PISSN: 13000179     EISSN: 13036114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ashihara, W., Hamamura, T. and Shinkaji, N. 1978. Feeding, reproduction, and development of Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) on various food substances. Bull. Fruit Tree Res. Stn., E2: 91-98.
2. Athias-Henriot, C. 19957. Phytoseiidae et Aceosejidae (Acarina: Gamasina) d' Algerie, I Genres Blattisocius Keegan, Iphiseius Berlese, Amblyseius Berlese, Phytoseius Ribaga, Phytoseiulus Evans. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Afrique du Nord, 48: 319-352.
3. Blackwood, J.S., Schausberger, P. and Croft, B.A. 2001. Prey-stage preference in generalist and specialist phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) when offered Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) eggs and larvae. Environ. Entomol. 30: 1103-1111.
4. Bravenboer, L. and Dosse, G. 1962. Phytoseiulus riegeli Dosse als prädator einiger schadmilben aus der Tetranychus urticae gruppe. Ent. Exp. Appl. 5: 291-304.
5. Chittenden, A.R. and Saito, Y. 2001. Why, are there feeding and non-feeding larvae in phytoseiid mites (Acari, Phytoseiidae)? J. Ethol. 19: 55-62.
6. Çölkesen, T. 1995. Biology, feeding characteristics and life tables of A. longispinosus Evans (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) at various temperature and relative humidity conditions and it's effectiveness in greenhouse and field conditions. PhD Thesis. Çukurova University, Adana, 175 pp.
7. Fernando. M.H.J.P. and Hassel. M.P. 1980. Predator-prey responses in an acarine system. Res. Pop. Ecol. 22: 301-322.
8. Goodwin, S. and Wellham. T.M. 1992. Comparison of dimethoate and methidathion tolerance in four strains of Phytoseiulus persimilis (Athias-Henriot) (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in Australia. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 16: 255-61.
9. Hassan, S.A. 1982. Relative tolerance of three strains of the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis A.-H. (Acari, Phytoseiidae.) to 11 pesticides used on glasshouse crops. Z. Ang. Ent. 93: 55-63.
10. Kazak, C. and Şekeroǧlu, E. 1990. Life tables of two strains of Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acarina, Phytoseiidae) under laboratory conditions. Publications of the Turkish Entomological Society, No: 4: pp. 203-10.
11. Kazak, C. and Şekeroǧlu, E. 1992. Numerical response and food consumption of Kaledran and Hatay strains of Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) under laboratory conditions. Publications of the Turkish Entomological Society, No. 5: pp. 135-43.
12. Kazak, C. 2001. Population dynamics naturally occurring Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) colonizing beans (Phaseolus vulgaris cv. Sari) infested by spider mites, Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Acari: Tetranychidae), in Turkey. Syst. & Appl. Acarol., 6: 19-25.
13. Kazak, C. 2006. Developmental and reproductive performance of Phytoseiulus persimilis (Phytoseiidae) from Hatay on a diet of Tetranychus cinnabarinus eggs (Tetranychiclae) at four constant temperatures. 12th International Congress of Acarology. Amsterdam. The Netherlands, 21-26 August, Book of Abstracts, pp. 89-90.
14. Kilinçer, N., Çobanoǧlu, S. and Has, A. 1996. Biological characteristics and consumption capacity of the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). J. Agric. For. 20: 107-115.
15. Laing, J.E. 1968. Life history and life table of Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot. Acarologia, 10: 578-88.
16. McMurtry, J.A. and Croft, B.A. 1997. Life-styles of phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 42: 291-321.
17. Ohnesorge, V.B. 1981. Populationsdynamische untersuchungen in einem Rauber-Beutetier-System: Phytoseiulus persimilis A-H. (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) und Tetrancyhus urticae Koch. Z. Angew. Entomol. 91: 25-49.
18. Pruszynski, S. 1976. Observations on the predacious behavior of Phytoseiulus persimilis. SROP/WPRS Bulletin, 4: 39-44.
19. Sabelis, M.W. 1981. Biological control of two-spotted spider mite using phytoseiid predators. Agric. Res. Rep. 910. Centre of Agricultural Publishing and Documentation. Wageningen 242 pp.
20. Sabelis. M.W. 1985. Predator-prey interaction: Predation on spider mites. Pp. 103-129. In. W. Helle and M.W. Sabelis (eds.) Spider mites: Their biology, natural enemies and control. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
21. Sekeroǧlu, E. and Kazak, C. 1993. First record of Phytoseiulus persimilis A-H. (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Turkey. Entomophaga, 38: 343-345.
22. Takafuji, A. and Chant, D.A. 1976. Comparative studies of two species of predacious phytoseiid mites (Acrina: Phytoseiidae), with special reference to their responses to the density of their prey. Res. Popul. Ecol. 17: 255-310.
23. Zamann, K., Kazak, C., Çolkesen, T. and Şekeroǧlu, E. 1990. Functional responses of Amblyseius bibens, A. longispinosus and two strains of Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Publications of the turkish Entomological Society, No: 4: pp. 197-202.
24. Zhang, Z.Q. and Croft, B.A. 1994. A comparative life history study of immature Ambyseius fallacis, Amblyseius andersoni, Typhlodromus occidentalis and pyri (Acari: Phytoseiidae) with a review of larval feeding patterns. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 18: 631-657.
25. Zhang, Z.Q. and Sanderson, J. 1995. Two-spotted spider mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) and Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on greenhouse roses: spatial distribution and predator efficacy. J. Econ. Entomol. 88: 352-57.
26. Zhang, Z.Q. 2003. Mites of Greenhouses. CABI Publishing Oxon, UK. 244 pp.