Judeo-Christian theology and the environment: moving beyond scepticism to new sources for environmental education in the United States

Environmental Education Research

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 55-74

  Hitzhusen, Gregory E ^a  

^a Cornell University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54749091497     PISSN: 13504622     EISSN: 14695871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13504620601122699     Document Type: Article

References (127)

1. Baer, R. A., 1966. Land misuse: a theological concern. The Christian Century, 83(41): 1239–1241.
2. Baer, R. A., 1969. Conservation: an arena for the church’s action. The Christian Century, 86(2): 40–43.
3. Baer, R. A., 1971. Ecology, religion, and the American dream. American Ecclesiastical Review, 165(1): 43–59.
4. Baer, R. A., Tantillo, J. A., Hitzhusen, G. E., Johnson, K. E., and Skillen, J. R., 2004. From delight to wisdom: 30 years of teaching environmental ethics at Cornell. Worldviews, 8(2–3): 298–322.
5. Barr, J., 1972. Man and nature: the ecological controversy of the Old Testament. Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester, 55(1): 9–32.
6. Berry, W., 1990. “ God and country ”. In What are people for? Essays by Wendell Berry, New York: North Point Press.
7. Bhagat, S. P., ed. 1994. God’s earth our home: a resource for congregational study and action on environmental and economic justice, New York: National Council of Churches of Christ in the USA.
8. Black, A. W., 1997. Religion and environmentally protective behavior in Australia. Social Compass, 44(3): 401–412.
9. Bouma-Prediger, S., 2001. For the beauty of the earth: a Christian vision for creation care, Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.
10. Bratton, S. P., 1983. The ecotheology of James Watt. Environmental Ethics, 5(3): 225–236.
11. Bratton, S. P., 1992. Loving nature: Eros or agape?. Environmental Ethics, 14(1): 3–25.
12. Bratton, S. P., 2004. Rockfish, redfish, stockfish, foodfish: seven biblical principles for the care of creation. Sojourners, 33(3): 22–25.
13. Coalition on the Environment and Jewish Life (COEJL). 1994. To till and to tend: a guide to Jewish environmental study and action, New York: Coalition on the Environment and Jewish Life.
14. Cobb, J., 1996. Ecotheology book list Available online at: http://www.cep.unt.edu/ecotheo.html (accessed 14 September 2006)
15. Cordano, M., Welcomer, S. A., and Scherer, R. F., 2003. An analysis of the predictive validity of the New Ecological Paradigm scale. The Journal of Environmental Education, 34(3): 22–28.
16. Dekker, P., Ester, P., and Nas, M., 1997. Religion, culture and environmental concern: an empirical cross-national analysis. Social Compass, 44(3): 443–458.
17. Derr, T. S., 1975. Religion’s responsibility for the ecological crisis: an argument run amok. Worldview, 18(1): 39–45.
18. DeWitt, C. B., 1994. Earth-Wise: A biblical response to environmental issues, Grand Rapids: CRC Publications.
19. Dunlap, R. E., and Van Liere, K. D., 1978. The ‘New Environmental Paradigm’: a proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education, 9(4): 10–19.
20. Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., and Jones, R. E., 2000. Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3): 425–442.
21. Eckberg, D. L., and Blocker, T. J., 1989. Varieties of religious involvement and environmental concerns: testing the Lynn White thesis. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28(4): 509–517.
22. Eckberg, D. L., and Blocker, T. J., 1996. Christianity, environmentalism, and the theoretical problem of fundamentalism. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 35(4): 343–355.
23. Edgell, M. C. R., and Nowell, D. E., 1989. The new environmental paradigm scale: wildlife and environmental beliefs in British Columbia. Society and Natural Resources, 2(4): 285–296.
24. Ellingsen, M., 1993. The cutting edge: how churches speak on social issues, Geneva: WCC Publications.
25. Elon, A., Hyman, N. M., and Waskow, A., eds. 1999. Trees, earth, and Torah: a Tu B’Shvat anthology, Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society.
26. Ester, P., and Seuren, B., 1992. Religious beliefs and environmental attitudes: an empirical test of the Lynn White hypothesis in fourteen nations. Sociale Wetenschappen, 35(1): 20–39.
27. Evangelical Environmental Network (EEN). 1994. Let the earth be glad: a starter kit for evangelical churches to care for God’s creation, Monrovia, CA: World Vision Office of Advocacy and Education.
28. Feldman, L. R., 2003. Small steps toward environmental tikkun for home and synagog Available online at: http://www.coejl.org/programbank/displayprog.php?id=151 (accessed 25 June 2006).
29. Foley, M. W., 1977. Who cut down the sacred tree? Replying to Lynn White, Jr’s popular thesis that Christianity is the root of all environmental evil. The CoEvolution Quarterly, 15: 60–67.
30. Gardner, G., 2002. Invoking the spirit: religion and spirituality in the quest for a sustainable world, Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute. (Worldwatch Paper 164)
31. Geno, B., Replacing the new environmental paradigm (NEP) with an ecologically sustainable development paradigm (ESDP): testing scale items on rural and regional Australian occupational groups. Sociological Sites/Sights, TASA 2000 Conference. 6–8 December. Adelaide: Flinders University.
32. Glacken, C. J., 1967. Traces on the Rhodian shore: nature and culture in western thought from ancient times to the end of the eighteenth century, Berkeley: University of California Press.
33. Goodstein, L., March 10 2005. “ Evangelical leaders swing influence behind effort to combat global warming ”. In The New York Times March 10, A16
34. Greeley, A., 1993. Religion and attitudes toward the environment. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 32(1): 19–28.
35. Griscom, A., August 26 2003. “ Now hear this: Bill Moyers speaks his mind on Bush-brand environmental destruction and more ”. In Grist Magazine August 26, Available online at: www.grist.org/news/maindish/2003/08/26/griscom-moyers (accessed 24 October 2004)
36. Guth, J. L., Kellstedt, L. A., Smidt, C. E., and Green, J. C., 1993. Theological perspectives and environmentalism among religious activists. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 32(4): 373–382.
37. Guth, J. L., Kellstedt, L. A., Smidt, C. E., and Green, J. C., 1995. Faith and the environment: religious beliefs and attitudes on environmental policy. American Journal of Political Science, 39(2): 364–382.
38. Haag, A., 2006. Church joins crusade over climate change. Nature, 440(7081): 136–137.
39. Haluza-Delay, R., 2000. Green fire and religious spirit. The Journal of Experiential Education, 23(3): 143–149.
40. Hand, C. M., and Van Liere, K. D., 1984. Religion, mastery-over-nature, and environmental concern. Social Forces, 63(2): 555–570.
41. Harvard Forum on Religion and Ecology (FORE). n.d. Statements Available online at: http://environment.Harvard.edu/religion/publications/statements/index.html (accessed 6 June 2006).
42. Hawthorne, M., and Alabaster, T., 1999. Citizen 2000: Development of a model of environmental citizenship. Global Environmental Change, 9(1): 25–43.
43. Hayes, B. C., and Marangudakis, M., 2000. Religion and environmental issues within Anglo-American democracies. Review of Religious Research, 42(2): 159–174.
44. Hayes, B. C., and Marangudakis, M., 2001. Religion and attitudes towards nature in Britain. British Journal of Sociology, 52(1): 139–155.
45. Heimlich, J. E., ed. 2005. “ Free-choice learning and the environment [Special issue] ”. In Environmental Education Research 261–387. 11(3)
46. Heschel, A. J., 1951. The Sabbath: its meaning for modern man, New York, Farrar: Straus, & Giroux.
47. Heschel, A. J., 1955. God in search of man, New York, Farrar: Straus, & Giroux.
48. Hiers, R. H., 1984. Ecology, biblical theology, and methodology: biblical perspectives on the environment. Zygon, 19(1): 43–59.
49. Hinderacker, J., 2005. Bill Moyers smears a better man than himself Available online at: http://powerlineblog.com/archives/009475.php (accessed 22 February 2005)
50. Hitzhusen, G. E., 2005. Understanding the role of spirituality and theology in outdoor environmental education: a mixed-method characterization of 12 Christian and Jewish outdoor programs. Research in Outdoor Education, 7: 39–56.
51. Hitzhusen, G. E., 2006. Religion and environmental education: building on common ground. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 11: 9–25.
52. Holland, L., and Carter, J. S., 2005. Words v. deeds: a comparison of religious belief and environmental action. Sociological Spectrum, 25(6): 739–753.
53. Hughes, J. D., 1994. Pan’s travail: environmental problems of the ancient Greeks and Romans, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
54. Hungerford, H. R., and Volk, T. L., 1990. Changing learner behavior through environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3): 8–21.
55. Jacobus, R. J., 2004. Understanding environmental theology: a summary for environmental educators. Journal of Environmental Education, 35(3): 35–42.
56. Jickling, B., and Russell, C., 2006. Religion and environmental education [Special issue]. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 11: 5–111.
57. Jurin, R. R., and Hutchinson, S., 2005. Worldviews in transition: using ecological autobiographies to explore students’ worldviews. Environmental Education Research, 11(5): 485–501.
58. Kanagy, C., and Nelsen, H. M., 1995. Religion and environmental concern: challenging the dominant assumptions. Review of Religious Research, 37(1): 33–45.
59. Kanagy, C. L., and Willits, F. K., 1993. A ‘greening’ of religion? Some evidence from a Pennsylvania sample. Social Science Quarterly, 74(3): 674–683.
60. Kearns, L., 1996. Saving the creation: Christian environmentalism in the United States. Sociology of Religion, 57(1): 55–70.
61. Kellert, S., and Berry, J., 1980. Phase III: knowledge, affection and basic attitudes toward animals in American society, Washington, DC: US Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service.
62. Kellert, S. R., and Farnham, T. J., eds. 2002. The good in nature and humanity: connecting science, religion, and spirituality with the natural world, Washington, DC: Island Press.
63. Kempton, W., Boster, J. S., and Hartley, J. A., 1995. Environmental values in American culture, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
64. Kim, D. S., 1999. Environmentalism in developing countries and the case of a large Korean city. Social Science Quarterly, 80(4): 810–829.
65. Limburg, J., 1991. The responsibility of royalty: Genesis 1–11 and the care of the earth. Word & World, 11(2): 124–130.
66. Lindaman, K., and Haider-Markel, D. P., 2002. Issue evolution, political parties, and the culture wars. Political Research Quarterly, 55(1): 91–110.
67. Lohfink, N., 1982. Great themes from the old testament, Edited by: Walls, (R., Chicago: Franciscan Herald Press; Edinburgh, T&T Clark Ltd.
68. Lohfink, N., 1994. “ ‘Subdue the earth?’ (Genesis 1:28) ”. In Theology of the Pentateuch: themes of the priestly narrative and Deuteronomy, Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
69. Lowry, R. C., 1998. Religion and the demand for membership in environmental citizen groups. Public Choice, 94: 223–240.
70. Marangudakis, M., 2001. The medieval roots of our ecological crisis. Environmental Ethics, 23(2): 243–260.
71. McGrath, A., 2002. The reenchantment of nature: the denial of religion and the ecological crisis, New York: Doubleday.
72. Merchant, C., 1992. Radical ecology, New York: Routledge.
73. Meyer, S. E., 2006. Christians and climate change Available online at: www.cpjustice.org/stories/StoryReader$1361 (accessed 10 June 2006)
74. Moncrief, L., 1970. The cultural basis for our environmental crisis: Judeo-Christian tradition is only one of many cultural factors contributing to the environmental crisis. Science, 170(3957): 508–512.
75. Moyers, B., January 30 2005. “ There is no tomorrow ”. In Minneapolis Star Tribune January 30, Op Ed.
76. Nash, J. A., 1991. Loving nature: ecological integrity and Christian responsibility, Nashville: Abingdon.
77. Nash, R. F., 1989. The rights of nature: a history of environmental ethics, Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
78. National Religious Partnership for the Environment (NRPE). n.d. Statements and activities Available online at: www.nrpe.org/statements/index.html (accessed 6 June 2006)
79. Nooney, J. G., Woodrum, E., Hoban, T. J., and Clifford, W. B., 2003. Environmental worldview and behavior: consequences of dimensionality in a survey of North Carolinians. Environment and Behavior, 35(6): 763–783.
80. Norton, B., 1991. Toward unity among environmentalists, New York: Oxford University Press.
81. Oelschlaeger, M., 1994. Caring for Creation: an ecumenical approach to the environmental crisis, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
82. Palmer, M., and Finlay, V., 2003. Faith in conservation: new approaches to religions and the environment, Washington, DC: The World Bank.
83. Pope, C., 1997. Religion and the environment: remarks of Carl Pope, Sierra Club Executive Director, Symposium on Religion, Science and the Environment under the auspices of His All Holiness Bartholomew I, Ecumenical Patriarch, Santa Barbara California, November 6–8, 1997 Available online at: http://www.christianecology.org/CarlPope.html (accessed 25 January 2005)
84. Pope, C., 1998. Reaching beyond ourselves: it’s time to recognize our allies in the faith community. Sierra, 83(6): 14–15.
85. Ramsey, J., and Hungerford, H. R., 2002. “ Perspectives on environmental education in the United States ”. In New tools for environmental protection: education, information, and voluntary measures, Edited by: Dietz, T., and Stern, P., 147–160. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
86. Rogerson, J. W., 1991. Genesis 1–11, Sheffield: England, JSOT Press for the Society for Old Testament Study.
87. Santmire, H. P., 1970. Brother earth: nature, God, and ecology in time of crisis, New York: Nelson.
88. Santmire, H. P., 1975. Reflections on the alleged bankruptcy of western theology. Anglican Theological Review, 57(2): 131–152.
89. Schaeffer, F.A., 1970. Pollution and the death of man: the Christian view of ecology, London: Hodder & Stoughton.
90. Scherer, G., October 27 2004. “ The godly must be crazy ”. In Grist Magazine October 27, Available online at: http://www.grist.org/news/maindish/2004/10/27/scherer-christian/ (accessed 11 November 2004)
91. Schrepfer, S. R., 1983. The fight to save the redwoods: a history of environmental reform, 1917–1978, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
92. Schultz, P. W., and Zelezny, L., 2003. Reframing environmental messages to be congruent with American values. Human Ecology Review, 10(2): 126–136.
93. Schultz, P. W., Zelezny, L., and Dalrymple, N. J., 2000. A multinational perspective on the relation between Judeo-Christian religious beliefs and attitudes of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 32(4): 576–591.
94. Schut, M., ed. 1999. Simpler living, compassionate life: a Christian perspective, Denver, CO: Living the Good News.
95. Scott, D., and Willits, F. K., 1994. Environmental attitudes and behavior: a Pennsylvania survey. Environmental Behavior, 26(2): 239–260.
96. Shaiko, R. G., 1987. Religion, politics, and environmental concern: a powerful mix of passions. Social Science Quarterly, 68(1–2): 244–262.
97. Shanahan, J., Pelstring, L., and McComas, K., 1999. Using narratives to think about environmental attitude and behavior: an exploratory study. Society & Natural Resources, 12(5): 405–419.
98. Sheldon, J., 1992. Rediscovery of creation: a bibliographical study of the church’s response to the environmental crisis, Metuchen, NJ: The American Theological Library Association. (ATLA Bibliography Series, 29)
99. Siemer, W. F., and Hitzhusen, G. E., “ Revisiting the stewardship concept: faith-based opportunities to bridge from principles to practice ”. In Aquatic stewardship education: theory and practice, Edited by: Knuth, B., and Siemer, W. F., Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society Books. in press
100. Sittler, J., 1954. A theology for earth. The Christian Scholar, 37(3): 367–374.
101. Sittler, J., 1964. The care of the earth and other university sermons, Philadelphia: Fortress.
102. Sittler, J., 1970. Ecological commitment as theological responsibility. Zygon, 5: 172–181.
103. Smith, C., ed. 2003. The secular revolution: power, interests, and conflict in the secularization of American public life, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
104. Sober, E., 1986. “ Philosophical problems for environmentalism ”. In The preservation of species, Edited by: Norton, B., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
105. Solomon, D., April 3 2005. “ Earthy evangelist ”. In The New York Times Magazine April 3, 17
106. Steffen, L. H., 1992. In defense of dominion. Environmental Ethics, 14(1): 63–80.
107. Stern, P. C., and Dietz, T., 1994. The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50(3): 65–84.
108. Stoll, M., 1997. Protestantism, capitalism, and nature in America, Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
109. Tarakeshwar, N., Swank, A. B., Pargament, K. I., and Mahoney, A., 2001. The sanctification of nature and theological conservatism: a study of opposing religious correlates of environmentalism. Review of Religious Research, 42(4): 387–404.
110. Tuan, Y. F., 1968. Discrepancies between environmental attitude and behavior: examples from Europe and China. The Canadian Geographer, 12(3): 176–191.
111. Tuan, Y. F., 1970. Our treatment of the environment in ideal and actuality. American Scientist, 244: 247–249. 58(3)
112. Tucker, M. E., and Grim, J., eds. 1997–2004. World religions and ecology series, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
113. United States Catholic Conference (USCC). 1994. Renewing the face of the earth: a resource for parishes, Washington, DC: United States Catholic Conference. [Publication No. 766–9]
114. United States Department of Education. n.d. Public and private institutions Available online at: http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ous/international/usnei/us/edlite-inst-pubpriv.html (accessed 19 July 2005)
115. United States Information Agency. 1997. Portrait of the USA (Chapter Six: A diverse educational system: structure, standards, and challenges) Available online at: http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/factover/ch6.htm (accessed 19 July 2005).
116. Van Putten, M., 2005. Mainstream consensus for environmentalism. Bioscience, 55(6): 468–469.
117. Watson, K., 2001. Environmental attitudes: what a difference the culture makes. Social Ecology and Lifelong Learning: Occasional Papers, 1: 57–70. Available online at: http://www.URLINSERT.com (accessed 15 April 2004)
118. Weigel, R.H., 1977. Ideological and demographic correlates of proecology behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 103(1): 39–47.
119. White, L., 1967. The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science, 155(3767): 1203–1207.
120. White, L., 1968. Dynamo and virgin reconsidered: essays in the dynamism of western culture, Cambridge: MIT.
121. Whitney, E., 1993. Lynn White, ecotheology, and history. Environmental Ethics, 15(2): 151–169.
122. Wildman, W., 2006. Bibliography in ecological ethics and eco-theology Available online at: http://people.bu.edu/wwildman/WeirdWildWeb/proj_bibs_ecoethics_00.htm (accessed 13 August 2005)
123. Wolf, R., 1981. God, James Watt, and the public’s land: our new Secretary of the Interior gets his guidance from a higher authority, and it isn’t always President Reagan. Audubon, 83(3): 58–65.
124. Wolkomir, M., Futreal, M., Woodrum, E., and Hoban, T., 1997a. Substantive religious belief and environmentalism. Social Science Quarterly, 78(1): 96–108.
125. Wolkomir, M., Futreal, M., Woodrum, E., and Hoban, T., 1997b. Denominational subcultures of environmentalism. Review of Religious Research, 38(4): 325–343.
126. Woodrum, E., and Hoban, T., 1994. Theology and religiosity effects on environmentalism. Review of Religious Research, 35(3): 193–206.
127. Woodrum, E., and Wolkomir, M. J., 1997. Religious effects on environmentalism. Sociological Spectrum, 17(2): 223–234.