Teacher appraisal in Hong Kong self-managing secondary schools: Factors for effective practices

Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 19-42

  Mo, Kim Wan ^a   Conners, Robert ^a   Mccormick, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54649085092     PISSN: 0920525X     EISSN: 15730425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1007912532307     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Airasian, P.W. (1993). Teacher assessment: Some issues for principals. NASSP Bulletin, Oct, 55-65.
2. Andrews, T.E., & Barnes, S. (1990). Assessment of teaching. In W.R. Houston (ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education. New York: Macmillan.
3. Bollington, R., Hopkins, D., & West, M. (1990). An introduction to teacher appraisal. London: Cassell.
4. Buttram, J.L., & Wilson, B.L. (1987). Promising trends in teacher evaluation. Educational Leadership, 44(7), 4-6.
5. Bridges, E.M. (1990). Evaluation for tenure and dismissal. In J. Millman and L. Darling-Hammond (eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
6. Caldwell, B.J., & Spinks, J.M. (1988). The self-managing school. East Sussex, UK: Falmer Press.
7. Castetter, W.B. (1992). The personnel function in educational administration (5th ed). New York: Macmillan.
8. Cheng, Y.C. (1992). A preliminary study of School Management Initiative: Responses to induction and implementation of management reforms. Educational Research Journal, 7, 21-32.
9. Chirnside, C. (1984). Ten commandments for successful teacher evaluation. NASSP Bulletin, 68(475), 42-43.
10. Dagley, D.L., & Orso, J.K. (1991). Integrating summative, formative modes of evaluation. NASSP Bulletin, 75(536), 72-82.
11. Darling-Hammond, L., Wise, A.E., & Pease, S.R. (1983). Teacher evaluation in the organizational context: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 53(3), 285-328.
12. Department of Education and Science (1983). Teaching Quality. London: HMSO.
13. Duckett, I. (1991). Promoting appraisal through an active staff development programme. School Organisation, 11(2), 153-169.
14. Duke, D.L. (1995). The move to reform teacher evaluation. In D.L. Duke (ed.), Teacher evaluation policy: From accountability to professional development. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
15. Duke, D.L., & Stiggins, R.J. (1986). Teacher evaluation: Five keys to growth. Washington, DC: National Educational Association.
16. Duke, D.L., & Stiggins, R.J. (1990). Beyond minimum competence: Evaluation for professional development. In J. Millman and L. Darling-Hammond (eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
17. Education and Manpower Branch and Education Department. (1991). The School Management Initiative: Setting the framework for quality in Hong Kong schools. Hong Kong: Government Printer.
18. Education Commission. (1994). Report of the working group on educational standards: Quality in School Education. Hong Kong: Government Printer.
19. Education Department. (1992a). SMI manual on school administration. Hong Kong: Education Department.
20. Education Department. (1992b). Staff appraisal in schools. Hong Kong: Education Department.
21. Education Department. (1994). Code of Aid. Hong Kong: Education Department.
22. Evertson, C.M., & Burry, J.A. (1989). Capturing classroom context: The observation system as lens for assessment. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 2, 297-320.
23. Feldman, R.S. (1985). Social psychology: Theories, research, and applications. New York: McGraw-Hill.
24. Fombrun, C.J., & Laud, R.L. (1983). Strategic issues in performance appraisal: Theory and practice. Personnel, 60(6), 23-31.
25. Garawski, R.A. (1980). Successful teacher evaluation not a myth. NASSP Bulletin, 64(434), 1-7.
26. Glattorn, A.A., & Holler, R.L. (1987). Differentiated teacher evaluation. Educational Leadership, 44(7), 56-58.
27. Goldhammer, R., Anderson, R.H., & Krajewski, R.J. (1993). Clinical supervision: Special methods for the supervision of teachers (3rd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
28. Goodman, L.V. (ed.). (1988). Effective teachers: Effective evaluation in American's elementary and middle schools. Alexandria, VA: National Association of Elementary School Principals.
29. Gorsuch, R.L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30. Haefele, D.L. (1981). Teacher interviews. In J. Millman (ed.), Handbook of teacher evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
31. Haefele, D.L. (1993). Evaluating teachers: A call for change. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 7, 21-31.
32. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
33. Heywood, J. (1992). School teacher appraisal: For monetary reward, or professional development, or both? In H. Tomlinson (ed.), Performance-related pay in education. London: Routledge.
34. Hunter, M. (1988). Effecting a reconciliation between supervision and evaluation: A reply to Popham. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 275-279.
35. James, C.R., & Mackenzie, C.A. (1986). Staff appraisal in the South Midlands and the South West of England: A survey of developments during 1985. Educational Management and Administration, 14, 197-202.
36. Johns, G. (1988). Organizational behavior: Understanding life at work. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
37. Kimball, R.B. (1980). Six approaches to evaluating teaching: A topology. NASSP Bulletin, 64(434), 41-47.
38. Kopelman, R.E. (1986). Objective feedback. In E.A. Locke (ed.), Generalizing from laboratory to field settings. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
39. Landy, F.J., Farr, J.L., & Jacobs, R.R. (1982). Utility concepts in performance measurement. Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, 30, 15-40.
40. Lane, B.A. (1990). Personnel evaluation. From problems to school improvement. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 23(4), 243-249.
41. Larson, R. (1984). Teacher performance evaluation: What are the key elements? NASSP Bulletin, 68(466), 13-18.
42. Leung, S.M. (1992). Performance appraisal helps boost morale. SMI Quarterly, 3, 9-11.
43. Machell, J. (1995). The teacher evaluation environment: An examination of attributes related to teacher growth. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 9(3), 259-273.
44. Madgic, R. (1980). Increasing the reliability of evaluations by using classroom products. NASSP Bulletin, 64(434), 12-15.
45. McConnell, E. (1995). Appraisal: Variation on a theme - one headteacher's stream of consciousness. In V. Williams (ed.), Towards self-managing schools: A secondary schools perspective. London: Cassell.
46. McGreal, T.L. (1982). Effective teacher evaluation systems. Educational Leadership, 39(4), 303-305.
47. McGreal, T.L. (1983). Successful teacher evaluation. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
48. McLaughlin, M.W., & Pfeifer, R.S. (1988). Teacher evaluation: Improvement, accountability, and effective learning. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
49. McMahon, A. (1994). Teacher appraisal in England and Wales. In L. Ingvarson & R. Chadbourne (eds.), Valuing teachers' work: New directions in teacher appraisal. Melbourne, Victoria: ACER.
50. McMahon, A. (1995). Teacher appraisal in England and Wales. In D.L. Duke (ed.), Teacher evaluation policy: From accountability to professional development. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
51. McNamara, N. (1995). Teacher appraisal. Sydney: Catholic Education Office.
52. Millman, J. (ed.) (1981). Handbook of teacher evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
53. Millman, J., & Darling-Hammond, L. (eds.). (1990). The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
54. Mortimore, P., & Mortimore, J. (1991). Teacher appraisal: back to the future. School Organisation, 11(2), 125-143.
55. Murphy, J. (1987). Teacher evaluation: A comprehensive framework for supervisors. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 157-180.
56. National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983). A nation at risk: the imperative of education reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
57. Natriello, G. (1990a). The impact of evaluation processes: The case of teachers. Advances in Educational Administration (Vol. 1, pt. B, pp. 1-39). Greenwich, CT: JAI
58. Natriello, G. (1990b). Intended and unintended consequences: Purposes and effects of teacher evaluation. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
59. Ovando, M.N. & Harris, B.M. (1993). Teachers' perceptions of the post-observation conference: Implications for formative evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 7, 301-310.
60. Parker, J.C. (1985). Career ladder/master teacher programs: Implications for principals. Reston, VA: The National Association of Secondary School Principals.
61. Popham, W.J. (1988). The dysfunctional marriage of formative and summative teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 269-273.
62. Poster, C., & Poster, D. (1993). Teacher appraisal: Training and implementation (2nd ed). London: Routledge.
63. Poston, W.K., & Manatt, R.P. (1993). Principals as evaluators: Limiting effects on school reform. International Journal of Educational Reform, 2(1), 41-48.
64. Root, D., & Overly, D. (1990). Successful teacher evaluation: Key elements for success. NASSP Bulletin, 74(527), 34-38.
65. Schalock, H.D., & Schalock, M.D. (1993). Student learning in teacher evaluation and school improvement: An introduction. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 7(2), 103-104.
66. Sergiovanni, T.J., & Starratt, R.J. (1993). Supervision: A redefinition (5th ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.
67. Shinkfield, A.J., & Stufflebeam, D. (1995). Teacher evaluation: Guide to effective practice. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
68. Stiggins, R.J. (1986). Teacher evaluation: Accountability and growth systems - Different purposes. NASSP Bulletin, 70(490), 51-58.
69. Stiggins, R., & Bridgeford, N.J. (1985). Performance assessment or teacher development. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 7(1), 85-97.
70. Stiggins, R.J., & Duke, D. (1988). The case for commitment to teacher growth: Research on teacher evaluation. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
71. Stodolsky, S.S. (1990). Classroom observation. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
72. Stronge, J.H. (1991). The dynamics of effective performance evaluation systems in education: Conceptual, human relations, and technical domains. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 5(1), 77-83.
73. Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (1983). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper & Row.
74. Tracy, S.J., & MacNaughton, R. (1993). Assisting and assessing educational personnel: The impact of clinical supervision. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
75. Turner, G. & Clift, P. (1988). Studies in teacher appraisal. East Sussex, UK: Farmer Press.
76. Valentine, J.W. (1992). Principles and practices for effective teacher evaluation. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
77. Wagoner, R.L., & O'Hanlon, J.P. (1968). Teacher attitude toward evaluation. Journal of Teacher Education, 19, 471-475.
78. Weber, J.R. (1987). Teacher evaluation as a strategy for improving instruction: Synthesis of literature. Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management, University of Oregon.
79. Wells, P. (1989). Policy developments in the United States of America. In J. Lokan & P. McKenzie (eds.), Teacher appraisal: Issues and practices. Radford House, Victoria: ACER.
80. West, M., & Bollington, R. (1990). Teacher appraisal: A practical guide for schools. London: David Fulton.
81. Wise, A.E., Darling-Hammond, L., McLaughlin, M.W., & Bernstein, H.T. (1985). Teacher evaluation: A study of effective practices. Elementary School Journal, 86(1), 61-121.
82. Wright, S.P., Horn, S.P. & Sanders, W.L. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11(1), 57-67.
83. Zelenark, M., & Snider, W. (1974). Teachers don't resent evaluation - if it's for the improvement of instruction. Phi Delta Kappan, 55, 570-571.