Distributive justice and the allocation of costs, losses, and profits

Social Justice Research

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 5-18

  Van Dijk, Eric ^a   Engelen, Mirjam ^a   Van Leeuwen, Esther ^a   Monden, Laura ^a   Sluijter, Erik ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Distributive justice; Resource allocation

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748653008     PISSN: 08857466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1023222206343     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Baron, J. (1995). Blind justice: Fairness to groups and the do-no-harm principle. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 8: 71-83.
2. Harris, R. J., and Joyce, M A. (1980). What's fair? It depends on how you phrase the question. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 38: 165-179.
3. Komorita, S. S., and Parks, C. D. (1995). Interpersonal relations: Mixed-motive interaction. Annual Review of Psychology 46: 183-207.
4. Messick, D. M. (1993). Equality as a decision heuristic. In Meilers, B. A., and Baron, J. (eds.), Psychological Perspectives on Justice: Theory and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 11-31.
5. Messick, D. M. (1995). Equality, fairness, and social conflict. Social Justice Research 8: 153-173.
6. Messick, D. M., and Schell, T. (1992). Evidence for an equality heuristic in social decision making. Acta Psychologica 80: 311-323.
7. Messick, D. M., and Sentis, K. P. (1983). Fairness, preference, and fairness biases. In Messick, D. M., and Cook, K. S. (eds.), Equity Theory, Praeger, New York, pp. 61-94.
8. Törnblom, K. Y. (1988). Positive and negative allocations: A typology and a model for conflicting justice principles. In Lawler, E. J., and Markovsky, B. (eds.), Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 5, JAI Press, Greenwich, pp. 141-168.
9. Törnblom, K. Y. (1992). The social psychology of distributive justice. In Scherer, K. R. (ed.), Justice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 177-236.
10. Törnblom, K. Y., and Jonsson, D. R. (1985). Subrules of the equality and contribution principles: Their perceived fairness in distribution and retribution. Social Psychology Quarterly 48: 249-261.
11. Törnblom, K. Y, and Jonsson, D. R. (1987). Distribution vs. retribution: The perceived justice of the contribution and equality principles for cooperative and competitive relationships. Acta Sociologica 30: 25-52.
12. Törnblom, K. Y, Mühlhausen, S. M., and Jonsson, D. R. (1991). The allocation of positive and negative outcomes: When is the equality principle fair for both? In Vermunt, R., and Steensma, H. (eds.), Social Justice in Human Relations, Vol. 1, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 59-100.
13. Van Dijk, E., and Wilke, H. (1993). Differential interests, equity, and public good provision. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 29: 1-16.
14. Van Dijk, E., and Wilke, H. (1995). Coordination rules in asymmetric social dilemmas: A comparison between Public Good dilemmas and Resource dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 31: 1-27.
15. Van Lange, P. A. M., Liebrand, W. B. G. Messick, D. M., and Wilke, H. A. M. (1992). Introduction and literature review. In Liebrand, W. B. G., Messick, D. M., and Wilke, H. A. M. (eds.), Social Dilemmas: Theoretical Issues and Research Findings, Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 3-28.
16. Walster, E., Walster, G. W., and Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and Research, Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
17. Wit, A. P., Wilke, H. A. M., and Oppewal, H. (1992). Fairness in asymmetric social dilemmas. In Liebrand, W. B. G., Messick, D. M., and Wilke, H. A. M. (eds.), Social Dilemmas: Theoretical Issues and Research Findings, Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 183-197.